Valentin Lackmann, Christian Sell, Miriam Henkel, Claudia Kozik, Cord Benecke
{"title":"操作性心理动力学诊断的互信度3 (OPD-3)。","authors":"Valentin Lackmann, Christian Sell, Miriam Henkel, Claudia Kozik, Cord Benecke","doi":"10.13109/zptm.2023.69.oa2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The study aims to assess interrater reliability of the revised Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis 3 (OPD-3) system. Three OPD axes were included in the reliability analysis: the Levels of Structural Integration Axis (OPD-LSIA), the Conflict Axis (OPD-CA), and the Interpersonal Relations Axis (OPD-IRA). <b>Methods:</b> A heterogeneous sample of n = 80 patients was diagnostically assessed with SCID-I and SCID-II as well as with an OPD interview. Two raters of a group of five independently rated each patient's OPD interview according to OPD-3. <b>Results:</b> Interrater reliability was good to excellent for OPD-LSIA [ICC₁,₁ = .874 - .920], and moderate to good forOPD-CA [ICC₁,₁ = .547 - .764] as well as forOPD-IRA at the aggregated level of Agency and Communion [ICC₁,₁ = .575 - .793], except for raters' self-perceived tendencies to act towards the patient. <b>Conclusion:</b> The revised OPD-3 can be used as a reliable instrument for a psychodynamic diagnosis of conflicts, levels of structural integration, and dysfunctional relationship patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":51217,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","volume":"69 2","pages":"108-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interrater Reliability of Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis 3 (OPD-3).\",\"authors\":\"Valentin Lackmann, Christian Sell, Miriam Henkel, Claudia Kozik, Cord Benecke\",\"doi\":\"10.13109/zptm.2023.69.oa2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The study aims to assess interrater reliability of the revised Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis 3 (OPD-3) system. Three OPD axes were included in the reliability analysis: the Levels of Structural Integration Axis (OPD-LSIA), the Conflict Axis (OPD-CA), and the Interpersonal Relations Axis (OPD-IRA). <b>Methods:</b> A heterogeneous sample of n = 80 patients was diagnostically assessed with SCID-I and SCID-II as well as with an OPD interview. Two raters of a group of five independently rated each patient's OPD interview according to OPD-3. <b>Results:</b> Interrater reliability was good to excellent for OPD-LSIA [ICC₁,₁ = .874 - .920], and moderate to good forOPD-CA [ICC₁,₁ = .547 - .764] as well as forOPD-IRA at the aggregated level of Agency and Communion [ICC₁,₁ = .575 - .793], except for raters' self-perceived tendencies to act towards the patient. <b>Conclusion:</b> The revised OPD-3 can be used as a reliable instrument for a psychodynamic diagnosis of conflicts, levels of structural integration, and dysfunctional relationship patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie\",\"volume\":\"69 2\",\"pages\":\"108-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2023.69.oa2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2023.69.oa2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interrater Reliability of Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis 3 (OPD-3).
Objective: The study aims to assess interrater reliability of the revised Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis 3 (OPD-3) system. Three OPD axes were included in the reliability analysis: the Levels of Structural Integration Axis (OPD-LSIA), the Conflict Axis (OPD-CA), and the Interpersonal Relations Axis (OPD-IRA). Methods: A heterogeneous sample of n = 80 patients was diagnostically assessed with SCID-I and SCID-II as well as with an OPD interview. Two raters of a group of five independently rated each patient's OPD interview according to OPD-3. Results: Interrater reliability was good to excellent for OPD-LSIA [ICC₁,₁ = .874 - .920], and moderate to good forOPD-CA [ICC₁,₁ = .547 - .764] as well as forOPD-IRA at the aggregated level of Agency and Communion [ICC₁,₁ = .575 - .793], except for raters' self-perceived tendencies to act towards the patient. Conclusion: The revised OPD-3 can be used as a reliable instrument for a psychodynamic diagnosis of conflicts, levels of structural integration, and dysfunctional relationship patterns.
期刊介绍：
This journal provides a systematic overview of the entire field of psychosomatic medicine. It is also the official organ of the German Society for Psychosomatic Medicine and Medical Psychotherapy (DGPM). It serves as a forum for discussions of the interdisciplinary experiences in the field of psychosomatics, the goal being the furtherance of scientific insights into the interactions between mental and physical factors in the development of disease. It also provides a way to deepen one´s knowledge of psychoanalysis and to explore new therapeutic directions.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
