欧洲肾功能联合会公式在中国成年人群中的验证:站在前人肩膀上的方程。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Nephron Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-14 DOI:10.1159/000531030
Yao Ma, Lu Wei, Zhenzhu Yong, Yue Yu, Yi Chen, Bei Zhu, Weihong Zhao
{"title":"欧洲肾功能联合会公式在中国成年人群中的验证:站在前人肩膀上的方程。","authors":"Yao Ma, Lu Wei, Zhenzhu Yong, Yue Yu, Yi Chen, Bei Zhu, Weihong Zhao","doi":"10.1159/000531030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Equations based on serum creatinine (SCr) have been extensively applied to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR), but their performance is debatable. In 2021, the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) published one novel SCr-based formula, which combined the feature of Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and full age spectrum (FAS) equations, but its potential applications remain unknown. We seek to assess the appropriateness of the three equations in Chinese adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 3,692 participants (median age, 54 years) were included. Reference GFR (rGFR) was measured by the 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method. Estimated GFR (eGFR) was calculated by the CKD-EPI, FAS, and EKFC equations. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were adopted to evaluate their validity. The performance was assessed in subgroups according to age, sex, rGFR, and SCr, considering the bias, accuracy, and precision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average rGFR was 74.2 mL/min/1.73 m2. eGFR by EKFC showed a relatively stronger correlation with rGFR (R = 0.749) and a larger area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.902). EKFC was significantly less biased and exhibited the highest P30 in the entire population (bias = 3.61, P30 = 73.3%). It also performed well in all analyzed subgroups, especially in participants with normal or slightly impaired renal function (rGFR≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2), and low SCr.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to the other two SCr-based formulas, EKFC performed better in the Chinese. Thus, it might serve as a good alternative, until a more suitable formula is developed for the Chinese population.</p>","PeriodicalId":18998,"journal":{"name":"Nephron","volume":" ","pages":"63-73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the European Kidney Function Consortium Equation in Chinese Adult Population: An Equation Standing on the Shoulders of Predecessors.\",\"authors\":\"Yao Ma, Lu Wei, Zhenzhu Yong, Yue Yu, Yi Chen, Bei Zhu, Weihong Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000531030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Equations based on serum creatinine (SCr) have been extensively applied to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR), but their performance is debatable. In 2021, the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) published one novel SCr-based formula, which combined the feature of Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and full age spectrum (FAS) equations, but its potential applications remain unknown. We seek to assess the appropriateness of the three equations in Chinese adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 3,692 participants (median age, 54 years) were included. Reference GFR (rGFR) was measured by the 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method. Estimated GFR (eGFR) was calculated by the CKD-EPI, FAS, and EKFC equations. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were adopted to evaluate their validity. The performance was assessed in subgroups according to age, sex, rGFR, and SCr, considering the bias, accuracy, and precision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average rGFR was 74.2 mL/min/1.73 m2. eGFR by EKFC showed a relatively stronger correlation with rGFR (R = 0.749) and a larger area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.902). EKFC was significantly less biased and exhibited the highest P30 in the entire population (bias = 3.61, P30 = 73.3%). It also performed well in all analyzed subgroups, especially in participants with normal or slightly impaired renal function (rGFR≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2), and low SCr.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to the other two SCr-based formulas, EKFC performed better in the Chinese. Thus, it might serve as a good alternative, until a more suitable formula is developed for the Chinese population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephron\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"63-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephron\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于血清肌酐(SCr)的公式已被广泛应用于估算肾小球滤过率(GFR),但其性能尚存争议。2021 年,欧洲肾功能联盟(EKFC)发布了一个基于 SCr 的新公式,该公式结合了慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组(CKD-EPI)和全年龄段(FAS)方程的特点,但其潜在应用仍不为人知。我们试图评估这三个公式在中国成年人中的适用性:方法:共纳入 3,692 名参与者(中位年龄 54 岁)。参考 GFR(rGFR)通过 99mTc-DTPA 肾动态成像方法测量。估算的 GFR(eGFR)通过 CKD-EPI、FAS 和 EKFC 方程计算。采用相关系数和 Bland-Altman 分析评估其有效性。根据年龄、性别、rGFR 和 SCr 对亚组进行了性能评估,并考虑了偏差、准确性和精确性:EKFC 的 eGFR 与 rGFR 的相关性相对较强(R = 0.749),接收者操作特征曲线下面积较大(0.902)。EKFC 的偏差明显较小,在整个人群中显示出最高的 P30(偏差 = 3.61,P30 = 73.3%)。在所有分析的亚组中,特别是在肾功能正常或轻度受损(rGFR≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2)和低 SCr 的参与者中,EKFC 也表现良好:与其他两种基于 SCr 的公式相比,EKFC 在中国人中的表现更好。结论:与其他两种基于 SCr 的公式相比,EKFC 在中国人中的表现更好,因此,在开发出更适合中国人的公式之前,EKFC 可以作为一种很好的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the European Kidney Function Consortium Equation in Chinese Adult Population: An Equation Standing on the Shoulders of Predecessors.

Background: Equations based on serum creatinine (SCr) have been extensively applied to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR), but their performance is debatable. In 2021, the European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) published one novel SCr-based formula, which combined the feature of Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and full age spectrum (FAS) equations, but its potential applications remain unknown. We seek to assess the appropriateness of the three equations in Chinese adults.

Methods: A total of 3,692 participants (median age, 54 years) were included. Reference GFR (rGFR) was measured by the 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method. Estimated GFR (eGFR) was calculated by the CKD-EPI, FAS, and EKFC equations. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were adopted to evaluate their validity. The performance was assessed in subgroups according to age, sex, rGFR, and SCr, considering the bias, accuracy, and precision.

Results: The average rGFR was 74.2 mL/min/1.73 m2. eGFR by EKFC showed a relatively stronger correlation with rGFR (R = 0.749) and a larger area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.902). EKFC was significantly less biased and exhibited the highest P30 in the entire population (bias = 3.61, P30 = 73.3%). It also performed well in all analyzed subgroups, especially in participants with normal or slightly impaired renal function (rGFR≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2), and low SCr.

Conclusions: Compared to the other two SCr-based formulas, EKFC performed better in the Chinese. Thus, it might serve as a good alternative, until a more suitable formula is developed for the Chinese population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nephron
Nephron UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ''Nephron'' comprises three sections, which are each under the editorship of internationally recognized leaders and served by specialized Associate Editors. Apart from high-quality original research, ''Nephron'' publishes invited reviews/minireviews on up-to-date topics. Papers undergo an innovative and transparent peer review process encompassing a Presentation Report which assesses and summarizes the presentation of the paper in an unbiased and standardized way.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信