圆团子假体:乳房假体破裂影像学上的不寻常鉴别诊断。

Eplasty Pub Date : 2023-01-01
David T Guerrero, Francesco M Egro, J Peter Rubin
{"title":"圆团子假体:乳房假体破裂影像学上的不寻常鉴别诊断。","authors":"David T Guerrero,&nbsp;Francesco M Egro,&nbsp;J Peter Rubin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although breast implant techniques have advanced considerably since the first recorded augmentation procedure in 1895, rupture remains a significant complication. Proper diagnosis is vital for patients' well-being but can sometimes prove challenging when there is no documentation of the initial procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This report describes a 58-year-old woman with a 30-year history of subglandular periareolar breast augmentation who was referred for bilateral implant rupture identified on computed tomography performed to monitor a breast nodule.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite classic imaging findings suggesting bilateral intracapsular implant rupture, breast implant revision surgery revealed a dense capsule containing 6 small silicone implants with no ruptures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is a unique case where radiographic imaging was misleading due to an undocumented unusual breast augmentation procedure that used multiple small \"gnocchi-like\" silicone implants. To our knowledge, this technique has never been described until now and should be noted by the surgical and radiological community.</p>","PeriodicalId":11687,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":"23 ","pages":"e28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257200/pdf/eplasty-23-e28.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gnocchi Implants: An Unusual Differential Diagnosis for Breast Implant Rupture on Imaging.\",\"authors\":\"David T Guerrero,&nbsp;Francesco M Egro,&nbsp;J Peter Rubin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although breast implant techniques have advanced considerably since the first recorded augmentation procedure in 1895, rupture remains a significant complication. Proper diagnosis is vital for patients' well-being but can sometimes prove challenging when there is no documentation of the initial procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This report describes a 58-year-old woman with a 30-year history of subglandular periareolar breast augmentation who was referred for bilateral implant rupture identified on computed tomography performed to monitor a breast nodule.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite classic imaging findings suggesting bilateral intracapsular implant rupture, breast implant revision surgery revealed a dense capsule containing 6 small silicone implants with no ruptures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is a unique case where radiographic imaging was misleading due to an undocumented unusual breast augmentation procedure that used multiple small \\\"gnocchi-like\\\" silicone implants. To our knowledge, this technique has never been described until now and should be noted by the surgical and radiological community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eplasty\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"e28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257200/pdf/eplasty-23-e28.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管自1895年首次隆胸手术以来,乳房植入技术已经取得了长足的进步,但破裂仍然是一个重要的并发症。正确的诊断对患者的健康至关重要,但有时在没有初始程序记录的情况下可能具有挑战性。方法:本报告描述了一名58岁的女性,有30年的腺下乳晕周围隆胸史,在监测乳房结节的计算机断层扫描中发现双侧植入物破裂。结果:尽管经典影像学表现提示双侧假体囊内破裂,但乳房假体翻修手术显示一个致密的囊内包含6个小硅胶假体,未破裂。结论:这是一个独特的病例,由于一个没有记录的不寻常的隆胸手术使用了多个小的“团子状”硅胶植入物,x线摄影成像被误导。据我们所知,这项技术直到现在还没有被描述过,应该引起外科和放射界的注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gnocchi Implants: An Unusual Differential Diagnosis for Breast Implant Rupture on Imaging.

Background: Although breast implant techniques have advanced considerably since the first recorded augmentation procedure in 1895, rupture remains a significant complication. Proper diagnosis is vital for patients' well-being but can sometimes prove challenging when there is no documentation of the initial procedure.

Methods: This report describes a 58-year-old woman with a 30-year history of subglandular periareolar breast augmentation who was referred for bilateral implant rupture identified on computed tomography performed to monitor a breast nodule.

Results: Despite classic imaging findings suggesting bilateral intracapsular implant rupture, breast implant revision surgery revealed a dense capsule containing 6 small silicone implants with no ruptures.

Conclusions: This is a unique case where radiographic imaging was misleading due to an undocumented unusual breast augmentation procedure that used multiple small "gnocchi-like" silicone implants. To our knowledge, this technique has never been described until now and should be noted by the surgical and radiological community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信