正畸托槽脱粘后三种残余粘合剂清除方法的比较评估。

Q2 Medicine
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2023-03-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2177-6709.27.6.e2220352.oar
Soghra Yassaei, Neda Joshan, Shiva Abdolahy, Azadeh Hakimi Rokn Abadi
{"title":"正畸托槽脱粘后三种残余粘合剂清除方法的比较评估。","authors":"Soghra Yassaei, Neda Joshan, Shiva Abdolahy, Azadeh Hakimi Rokn Abadi","doi":"10.1590/2177-6709.27.6.e2220352.oar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the effects of three methods of adhesive remnant removal (carbide bur and low speed handpiece, carbide bur and high speed handpiece, and zircon-rich glass fiber reinforced composite bur), after orthodontic bracket debonding, on tooth color and enamel surface roughness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety sound premolar teeth were selected. The baseline tooth color was assessed using Vita spectrophotometer. The teeth were subjected to bracket bonding processes and then randomly divided into three equal groups. In each group, composite remnant was removed by one of the three methods of adhesive removal, and the teeth were then subjected to color assessment again. To measure the surface roughness, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) with x400 magnification was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ANOVA showed that the effect of the three methods of adhesive remnant removal on ∆L, ∆b and ∆E was statistically significant (p=0.01), but without significant effect on ∆a. Comparison of the means showed that composite bur and high speed carbide bur yielded the highest ∆E (p=0.05), and had a significant difference when compared to carbide bur and low speed handpiece. The highest ∆L and ∆b values belonged to samples approached with composite bur and carbide bur with high speed handpiece, respectively. SEM analysis showed that the composite bur created a very smooth surface, compared to the other two methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Zircon-rich glass fiber reinforced composite created the smoothest enamel surface and highest color change, when compared to the other two methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":38720,"journal":{"name":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"27 6","pages":"e2220352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of three methods of adhesive remnant removal after orthodontic bracket debonding.\",\"authors\":\"Soghra Yassaei, Neda Joshan, Shiva Abdolahy, Azadeh Hakimi Rokn Abadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2177-6709.27.6.e2220352.oar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the effects of three methods of adhesive remnant removal (carbide bur and low speed handpiece, carbide bur and high speed handpiece, and zircon-rich glass fiber reinforced composite bur), after orthodontic bracket debonding, on tooth color and enamel surface roughness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety sound premolar teeth were selected. The baseline tooth color was assessed using Vita spectrophotometer. The teeth were subjected to bracket bonding processes and then randomly divided into three equal groups. In each group, composite remnant was removed by one of the three methods of adhesive removal, and the teeth were then subjected to color assessment again. To measure the surface roughness, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) with x400 magnification was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ANOVA showed that the effect of the three methods of adhesive remnant removal on ∆L, ∆b and ∆E was statistically significant (p=0.01), but without significant effect on ∆a. Comparison of the means showed that composite bur and high speed carbide bur yielded the highest ∆E (p=0.05), and had a significant difference when compared to carbide bur and low speed handpiece. The highest ∆L and ∆b values belonged to samples approached with composite bur and carbide bur with high speed handpiece, respectively. SEM analysis showed that the composite bur created a very smooth surface, compared to the other two methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Zircon-rich glass fiber reinforced composite created the smoothest enamel surface and highest color change, when compared to the other two methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"e2220352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10042465/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.27.6.e2220352.oar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.27.6.e2220352.oar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估正畸托槽脱粘后,三种残余粘合剂去除方法(硬质合金毛刺和低速手机、硬质合金毛刺和高速手机、富锆玻璃纤维增强复合材料毛刺)对牙齿颜色和珐琅质表面粗糙度的影响:选取 90 颗健全的前磨牙。方法:选取 90 颗完整的前臼齿,使用 Vita 分光光度计评估牙齿的基线颜色。对这些牙齿进行托槽粘接处理,然后随机分为三组。在每组中,用三种去除粘合剂的方法中的一种去除复合树脂残留物,然后再次对牙齿进行颜色评估。为了测量表面粗糙度,使用了放大倍数为 x400 的扫描电子显微镜(SEM):方差分析显示,三种去除残余粘合剂的方法对 ∆L、∆b 和 ∆E 的影响有统计学意义(P=0.01),但对∆a 没有显著影响。均值比较显示,复合毛刺和高速硬质合金毛刺产生的 ∆E 最高(p=0.05),与硬质合金毛刺和低速手机相比差异显著。用复合锉刀和高速硬质合金锉刀及高速手机加工的样品的 ∆L 和 ∆b 值分别最高。扫描电子显微镜分析表明,与其他两种方法相比,复合锉刀能产生非常光滑的表面:结论:与其他两种方法相比,富含锆石的玻璃纤维增强复合材料能产生最光滑的珐琅质表面和最高的颜色变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative evaluation of three methods of adhesive remnant removal after orthodontic bracket debonding.

Comparative evaluation of three methods of adhesive remnant removal after orthodontic bracket debonding.

Comparative evaluation of three methods of adhesive remnant removal after orthodontic bracket debonding.

Comparative evaluation of three methods of adhesive remnant removal after orthodontic bracket debonding.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the effects of three methods of adhesive remnant removal (carbide bur and low speed handpiece, carbide bur and high speed handpiece, and zircon-rich glass fiber reinforced composite bur), after orthodontic bracket debonding, on tooth color and enamel surface roughness.

Methods: Ninety sound premolar teeth were selected. The baseline tooth color was assessed using Vita spectrophotometer. The teeth were subjected to bracket bonding processes and then randomly divided into three equal groups. In each group, composite remnant was removed by one of the three methods of adhesive removal, and the teeth were then subjected to color assessment again. To measure the surface roughness, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) with x400 magnification was used.

Results: ANOVA showed that the effect of the three methods of adhesive remnant removal on ∆L, ∆b and ∆E was statistically significant (p=0.01), but without significant effect on ∆a. Comparison of the means showed that composite bur and high speed carbide bur yielded the highest ∆E (p=0.05), and had a significant difference when compared to carbide bur and low speed handpiece. The highest ∆L and ∆b values belonged to samples approached with composite bur and carbide bur with high speed handpiece, respectively. SEM analysis showed that the composite bur created a very smooth surface, compared to the other two methods.

Conclusion: Zircon-rich glass fiber reinforced composite created the smoothest enamel surface and highest color change, when compared to the other two methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: The Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics publishes scientific research articles, significant reviews, clinical and technical case reports, brief communications, and other materials related to Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信