夏洛特·马克科约翰内斯堡学术医院的临床医生对图片存档和通信系统的看法。

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Polite Tshalibe, Jacinta Adrigwe, Susan Lucas
{"title":"夏洛特·马克科约翰内斯堡学术医院的临床医生对图片存档和通信系统的看法。","authors":"Polite Tshalibe,&nbsp;Jacinta Adrigwe,&nbsp;Susan Lucas","doi":"10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are now an established means of capturing, storing, distribution and viewing of all radiology images. The study was conducted in a quaternary hospital, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH), part of the University of the Witwatersrand teaching circuit, in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure the clinicians' perceived benefits and challenges of PACS. To document perceived views on how the current PACS can be improved.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a cross-sectional observational study over a period of 5 months from September 2021 to January 2022 carried out at CMJAH. Questionnaires were distributed to referring clinicians with PACS experience. Descriptive statistics was conducted. Categorical variables were presented as frequency and percentages. The continuous variables were presented as means ± standard deviation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A survey with a response rate of 54% found the benefits most reported by clinicians were improved patient care, less time needed to review an exam, improved image comparison and consultation efficiency. With respect to perceived challenges, the unavailability of images at the bedside, problems with access and the lack of advanced image manipulating software were noted. The most frequent recommendations on improvements focused on the aforementioned challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hospital-wide PACS was viewed beneficial by most clinicians. Nonetheless, there are a few aspects that deserve attention to improve the functionality and access of the system.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The findings will assist in future hospital or provincial-wide PACS deployment projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":43442,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Radiology","volume":"27 1","pages":"2578"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicians' perspective of picture archiving and communication systems at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Polite Tshalibe,&nbsp;Jacinta Adrigwe,&nbsp;Susan Lucas\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are now an established means of capturing, storing, distribution and viewing of all radiology images. The study was conducted in a quaternary hospital, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH), part of the University of the Witwatersrand teaching circuit, in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To measure the clinicians' perceived benefits and challenges of PACS. To document perceived views on how the current PACS can be improved.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a cross-sectional observational study over a period of 5 months from September 2021 to January 2022 carried out at CMJAH. Questionnaires were distributed to referring clinicians with PACS experience. Descriptive statistics was conducted. Categorical variables were presented as frequency and percentages. The continuous variables were presented as means ± standard deviation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A survey with a response rate of 54% found the benefits most reported by clinicians were improved patient care, less time needed to review an exam, improved image comparison and consultation efficiency. With respect to perceived challenges, the unavailability of images at the bedside, problems with access and the lack of advanced image manipulating software were noted. The most frequent recommendations on improvements focused on the aforementioned challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hospital-wide PACS was viewed beneficial by most clinicians. Nonetheless, there are a few aspects that deserve attention to improve the functionality and access of the system.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The findings will assist in future hospital or provincial-wide PACS deployment projects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SA Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"2578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244939/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SA Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2578\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:图像存档和通信系统(PACS)现在是捕获、存储、分发和查看所有放射学图像的一种既定手段。这项研究是在南非威特沃特斯兰德大学教学回路的一家第四医院——夏洛特·马克·约翰内斯堡学术医院(CMJAH)进行的。目的:了解临床医生对PACS的获益和挑战。记录人们对如何改进现行PACS的看法。方法:这是一项横断面观察性研究,于2021年9月至2022年1月在CMJAH进行,为期5个月。问卷分发给具有PACS经验的转诊临床医生。进行描述性统计。分类变量以频率和百分比表示。连续变量以均数±标准差表示。结果:一项应答率为54%的调查发现,临床医生报告的最多的好处是改善了患者护理,减少了复习检查所需的时间,改善了图像比较和咨询效率。关于感知到的挑战,注意到床边无法获得图像,访问问题和缺乏先进的图像处理软件。最常见的改进建议集中在上述挑战上。结论:大多数临床医生认为全院范围的PACS是有益的。尽管如此,为了改进系统的功能和访问,有几个方面值得注意。贡献:研究结果将有助于未来医院或全省范围的PACS部署项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinicians' perspective of picture archiving and communication systems at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital.

Clinicians' perspective of picture archiving and communication systems at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital.

Clinicians' perspective of picture archiving and communication systems at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital.

Clinicians' perspective of picture archiving and communication systems at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital.

Background: Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are now an established means of capturing, storing, distribution and viewing of all radiology images. The study was conducted in a quaternary hospital, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH), part of the University of the Witwatersrand teaching circuit, in South Africa.

Objectives: To measure the clinicians' perceived benefits and challenges of PACS. To document perceived views on how the current PACS can be improved.

Method: This was a cross-sectional observational study over a period of 5 months from September 2021 to January 2022 carried out at CMJAH. Questionnaires were distributed to referring clinicians with PACS experience. Descriptive statistics was conducted. Categorical variables were presented as frequency and percentages. The continuous variables were presented as means ± standard deviation.

Results: A survey with a response rate of 54% found the benefits most reported by clinicians were improved patient care, less time needed to review an exam, improved image comparison and consultation efficiency. With respect to perceived challenges, the unavailability of images at the bedside, problems with access and the lack of advanced image manipulating software were noted. The most frequent recommendations on improvements focused on the aforementioned challenges.

Conclusion: Hospital-wide PACS was viewed beneficial by most clinicians. Nonetheless, there are a few aspects that deserve attention to improve the functionality and access of the system.

Contribution: The findings will assist in future hospital or provincial-wide PACS deployment projects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SA Journal of Radiology
SA Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The SA Journal of Radiology is the official journal of the Radiological Society of South Africa and the Professional Association of Radiologists in South Africa and Namibia. The SA Journal of Radiology is a general diagnostic radiological journal which carries original research and review articles, pictorial essays, case reports, letters, editorials, radiological practice and other radiological articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信