YouTube是翼状胬肉手术患者信息的来源。

IF 2.3 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Cem Ozturkmen, Mustafa Berhuni
{"title":"YouTube是翼状胬肉手术患者信息的来源。","authors":"Cem Ozturkmen,&nbsp;Mustafa Berhuni","doi":"10.1177/25158414231174143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients use the YouTube platform to get information about pterygium surgery, and this affects the treatment decisions of the patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to analyze the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as educational resources about pterygium surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a register-based retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, record-based study. A YouTube search was performed using the terms 'pterygium surgery' and 'pterygium eye surgery', resulting in the evaluation of a total of 200 videos. In the end, 122 English-language videos about pterygium surgery were recruited to study. All videos were rated with the DISCERN, the <i>Journal of the American Medical Association</i> (JAMA), and the Global Quality Score (GQS) systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS values were 38.9 ± 10.9, 1.8 ± 0.8, and 2.2 ± 1, respectively. The YouTube videos about pterygium surgery had been uploaded by a physician in 63 (51.6%) and non-physicians in 59 (48.4%) cases. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of general characteristics and scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results show that YouTube videos about pterygium surgery have low quality and credibility and are not sufficient in terms of providing patient information.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":23054,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","volume":"15 ","pages":"25158414231174143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d2/68/10.1177_25158414231174143.PMC10226336.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"YouTube as a source of patient information for pterygium surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Cem Ozturkmen,&nbsp;Mustafa Berhuni\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25158414231174143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients use the YouTube platform to get information about pterygium surgery, and this affects the treatment decisions of the patients.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to analyze the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as educational resources about pterygium surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a register-based retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, record-based study. A YouTube search was performed using the terms 'pterygium surgery' and 'pterygium eye surgery', resulting in the evaluation of a total of 200 videos. In the end, 122 English-language videos about pterygium surgery were recruited to study. All videos were rated with the DISCERN, the <i>Journal of the American Medical Association</i> (JAMA), and the Global Quality Score (GQS) systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS values were 38.9 ± 10.9, 1.8 ± 0.8, and 2.2 ± 1, respectively. The YouTube videos about pterygium surgery had been uploaded by a physician in 63 (51.6%) and non-physicians in 59 (48.4%) cases. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of general characteristics and scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results show that YouTube videos about pterygium surgery have low quality and credibility and are not sufficient in terms of providing patient information.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"25158414231174143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d2/68/10.1177_25158414231174143.PMC10226336.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414231174143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414231174143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者通过YouTube平台获取翼状胬肉手术信息,影响患者的治疗决策。目的:本研究的目的是分析YouTube视频作为翼状胬肉手术教育资源的质量和可靠性。设计:这是一项基于登记册的回顾性研究。方法:这是一项基于记录的回顾性研究。在YouTube上搜索“翼状胬肉手术”和“翼状胬肉眼科手术”,总共对200个视频进行了评估。最后,我们招募了122段关于翼状胬肉手术的英语视频进行研究。所有视频都经过了美国医学会杂志(JAMA)和全球质量评分(GQS)系统的评估。结果:DISCERN、JAMA和GQS的平均值分别为38.9±10.9、1.8±0.8和2.2±1。有医生上传的翼状胬肉手术视频63例(51.6%),非医生上传的59例(48.4%)。两组在一般特征和得分方面无显著差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,YouTube上关于翼状胬肉手术的视频质量和可信度较低,在提供患者信息方面不足。报名:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

YouTube as a source of patient information for pterygium surgery.

YouTube as a source of patient information for pterygium surgery.

YouTube as a source of patient information for pterygium surgery.

YouTube as a source of patient information for pterygium surgery.

Background: Patients use the YouTube platform to get information about pterygium surgery, and this affects the treatment decisions of the patients.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as educational resources about pterygium surgery.

Design: This is a register-based retrospective study.

Methods: This was a retrospective, record-based study. A YouTube search was performed using the terms 'pterygium surgery' and 'pterygium eye surgery', resulting in the evaluation of a total of 200 videos. In the end, 122 English-language videos about pterygium surgery were recruited to study. All videos were rated with the DISCERN, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), and the Global Quality Score (GQS) systems.

Results: The mean DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS values were 38.9 ± 10.9, 1.8 ± 0.8, and 2.2 ± 1, respectively. The YouTube videos about pterygium surgery had been uploaded by a physician in 63 (51.6%) and non-physicians in 59 (48.4%) cases. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of general characteristics and scores.

Conclusions: Our results show that YouTube videos about pterygium surgery have low quality and credibility and are not sufficient in terms of providing patient information.

Registration: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信