分数CO2和分数Er:YAG治疗痤疮疤痕的比较研究:一项裂面试验。

Fatemeh Mokhtari, Zahra Safavi, Gita Faghihi, Ali Asilian, Zabihollah Shahmoradi
{"title":"分数CO2和分数Er:YAG治疗痤疮疤痕的比较研究:一项裂面试验。","authors":"Fatemeh Mokhtari,&nbsp;Zahra Safavi,&nbsp;Gita Faghihi,&nbsp;Ali Asilian,&nbsp;Zabihollah Shahmoradi","doi":"10.4103/abr.abr_330_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Acne is a dermatologic condition with a high burden in terms of psychosocial consequences as a result of scars remaining on the skin. Its effects are severe in adolescence and finding treatments with short therapy courses, superior results, and fewer adverse effects are of high importance. Materials and Methods: We included 30 individuals with acne vulgaris scars in Al-Zahra academic training hospital from June 2018 to Jan 2019. Each individual received both fractional CO2 and fractional Er:YAG lasers on right and left sides of the face, respectively. Three sessions of laser treatment were applied to each side with one-month intervals. Results were evaluated by patients according to subjective satisfaction and physicians’ assessment and photo evaluation by two blinded dermatologists. Improvement was graded by a quartile grading scale: less than 25%: mild, 25% to 50%: moderate, 51% to 75%: good, and 76% to 100%: excellent response. Assessments were obtained at baseline and one month after the last visit. Results: Based on subjective satisfaction (p < 0.05) and physicians’ assessment (p < 0.01), fractional CO2 laser was significantly more effective than Erbium:YAG laser. Also, Post-treatment side effects were mild and transient in both groups. Conclusion: Laser therapies are common in the treatment of scars and each modality has special advantages and disadvantages. Choosing among them should be based on various criteria. Fractional CO2 lasers have been revealed favorable results in most reports. Large comprehensive trials could help experts in choosing among alternatives for different subgroups.","PeriodicalId":7225,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Biomedical Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/34/e7/ABR-12-90.PMC10241645.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study on the Usefulness of Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> and Fractional Er:YAG in Acne Scars: A Split-Face Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Mokhtari,&nbsp;Zahra Safavi,&nbsp;Gita Faghihi,&nbsp;Ali Asilian,&nbsp;Zabihollah Shahmoradi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/abr.abr_330_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Acne is a dermatologic condition with a high burden in terms of psychosocial consequences as a result of scars remaining on the skin. Its effects are severe in adolescence and finding treatments with short therapy courses, superior results, and fewer adverse effects are of high importance. Materials and Methods: We included 30 individuals with acne vulgaris scars in Al-Zahra academic training hospital from June 2018 to Jan 2019. Each individual received both fractional CO2 and fractional Er:YAG lasers on right and left sides of the face, respectively. Three sessions of laser treatment were applied to each side with one-month intervals. Results were evaluated by patients according to subjective satisfaction and physicians’ assessment and photo evaluation by two blinded dermatologists. Improvement was graded by a quartile grading scale: less than 25%: mild, 25% to 50%: moderate, 51% to 75%: good, and 76% to 100%: excellent response. Assessments were obtained at baseline and one month after the last visit. Results: Based on subjective satisfaction (p < 0.05) and physicians’ assessment (p < 0.01), fractional CO2 laser was significantly more effective than Erbium:YAG laser. Also, Post-treatment side effects were mild and transient in both groups. Conclusion: Laser therapies are common in the treatment of scars and each modality has special advantages and disadvantages. Choosing among them should be based on various criteria. Fractional CO2 lasers have been revealed favorable results in most reports. Large comprehensive trials could help experts in choosing among alternatives for different subgroups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Biomedical Research\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/34/e7/ABR-12-90.PMC10241645.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Biomedical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_330_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_330_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:痤疮是一种皮肤疾病,由于皮肤上残留的疤痕,在心理社会后果方面具有很高的负担。它的影响在青少年中是严重的,寻找治疗过程短、效果好、副作用少的治疗方法是非常重要的。材料与方法:我们纳入2018年6月至2019年1月在Al-Zahra学术培训医院治疗的30例寻常痤疮疤痕患者。每个人的左右两侧分别接受了少量CO2和少量Er:YAG激光照射。每侧激光治疗3次,间隔1个月。结果由患者根据主观满意度、医师评价和两位盲法皮肤科医师的照片评价进行评价。改善程度按四分位数分级量表进行分级:低于25%为轻度,25%至50%为中度,51%至75%为良好,76%至100%为极好。在基线和最后一次访问后一个月进行评估。结果:基于主观满意度(p < 0.05)和医师评价(p < 0.01),分数CO2激光治疗效果明显优于铒镱激光治疗。此外,两组治疗后的副作用都是轻微和短暂的。结论:激光治疗疤痕是一种常见的治疗方法,每种治疗方式都有其独特的优缺点。在他们之间的选择应该基于各种标准。在大多数报告中,分数CO2激光器已经显示出良好的结果。大型综合试验可以帮助专家在不同亚组的替代方案中做出选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Comparative Study on the Usefulness of Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> and Fractional Er:YAG in Acne Scars: A Split-Face Trial.

A Comparative Study on the Usefulness of Fractional CO2 and Fractional Er:YAG in Acne Scars: A Split-Face Trial.
Background: Acne is a dermatologic condition with a high burden in terms of psychosocial consequences as a result of scars remaining on the skin. Its effects are severe in adolescence and finding treatments with short therapy courses, superior results, and fewer adverse effects are of high importance. Materials and Methods: We included 30 individuals with acne vulgaris scars in Al-Zahra academic training hospital from June 2018 to Jan 2019. Each individual received both fractional CO2 and fractional Er:YAG lasers on right and left sides of the face, respectively. Three sessions of laser treatment were applied to each side with one-month intervals. Results were evaluated by patients according to subjective satisfaction and physicians’ assessment and photo evaluation by two blinded dermatologists. Improvement was graded by a quartile grading scale: less than 25%: mild, 25% to 50%: moderate, 51% to 75%: good, and 76% to 100%: excellent response. Assessments were obtained at baseline and one month after the last visit. Results: Based on subjective satisfaction (p < 0.05) and physicians’ assessment (p < 0.01), fractional CO2 laser was significantly more effective than Erbium:YAG laser. Also, Post-treatment side effects were mild and transient in both groups. Conclusion: Laser therapies are common in the treatment of scars and each modality has special advantages and disadvantages. Choosing among them should be based on various criteria. Fractional CO2 lasers have been revealed favorable results in most reports. Large comprehensive trials could help experts in choosing among alternatives for different subgroups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信