干针加胸椎手法和颈椎活动度锻炼对成人颈部疼痛的直接影响:一项随机临床试验

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Brian A. Young PT, DSc , David M. Boland PT, PhD , Abby Manzo DPT , Haley Yaw DPT , Brian Carlson DPT , Spencer Carrier DPT , Kameryn Corcoran DPT , Megan Dial DPT , Robert B. Briggs PT, PhD , Bradley Tragord PT, DSc , Shane L. Koppenhaver PT, PhD
{"title":"干针加胸椎手法和颈椎活动度锻炼对成人颈部疼痛的直接影响:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Brian A. Young PT, DSc ,&nbsp;David M. Boland PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Abby Manzo DPT ,&nbsp;Haley Yaw DPT ,&nbsp;Brian Carlson DPT ,&nbsp;Spencer Carrier DPT ,&nbsp;Kameryn Corcoran DPT ,&nbsp;Megan Dial DPT ,&nbsp;Robert B. Briggs PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Bradley Tragord PT, DSc ,&nbsp;Shane L. Koppenhaver PT, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to determine the immediate effects of adding dry needling<span> (DN) to thoracic spine manipulation and neck-specific exercise in individuals with neck pain.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>Forty-two participants with neck pain were randomized to either the true (n = 21) or sham (n = 21) DN groups, receiving treatment on the initial visit and 2 to 3 days later. Outcomes were assessed on day 1, both at baseline and immediately after the initial treatment, at the second treatment 2 to 3 days later, and at the final visit 5 to 7 days after visit 2. Primary outcomes were </span>Neck Disability Index<span> (NDI) (0-50) and current pain via numeric pain rating scale (0-10). Secondary outcomes were cervical range of motion, </span></span>pain pressure threshold, and global rating of change.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>Repeated measures analysis of covariance with baseline value as covariate revealed no significant difference in NDI scores at either follow-up time point with adjusted mean differences (95% confidence interval) of -0.11 (-2.70 to 2.48) and 0.31 (-1.96 to 2.57). There were no between-group differences in pain at any time point via Independent-Samples </span>Median Test (</span><em>P</em> value range of .54-1.0). Secondary outcome measures were similarly not statistically different between groups except for immediate improvements in rotation to the side opposite of pain, which favored DN, with an adjusted mean difference (95% confidence interval) of 7.85 (3.54-12.15) degrees.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The addition of DN to thoracic spinal manipulation and neck-specific exercise did not affect improvements in NDI score or numeric pain rating scale but showed an increase in cervical range of motion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immediate Effects of Adding Dry Needling to Thoracic Manipulation and Exercise in Cervical Range of Motion for Adults With Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Brian A. Young PT, DSc ,&nbsp;David M. Boland PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Abby Manzo DPT ,&nbsp;Haley Yaw DPT ,&nbsp;Brian Carlson DPT ,&nbsp;Spencer Carrier DPT ,&nbsp;Kameryn Corcoran DPT ,&nbsp;Megan Dial DPT ,&nbsp;Robert B. Briggs PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Bradley Tragord PT, DSc ,&nbsp;Shane L. Koppenhaver PT, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to determine the immediate effects of adding dry needling<span> (DN) to thoracic spine manipulation and neck-specific exercise in individuals with neck pain.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>Forty-two participants with neck pain were randomized to either the true (n = 21) or sham (n = 21) DN groups, receiving treatment on the initial visit and 2 to 3 days later. Outcomes were assessed on day 1, both at baseline and immediately after the initial treatment, at the second treatment 2 to 3 days later, and at the final visit 5 to 7 days after visit 2. Primary outcomes were </span>Neck Disability Index<span> (NDI) (0-50) and current pain via numeric pain rating scale (0-10). Secondary outcomes were cervical range of motion, </span></span>pain pressure threshold, and global rating of change.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span><span>Repeated measures analysis of covariance with baseline value as covariate revealed no significant difference in NDI scores at either follow-up time point with adjusted mean differences (95% confidence interval) of -0.11 (-2.70 to 2.48) and 0.31 (-1.96 to 2.57). There were no between-group differences in pain at any time point via Independent-Samples </span>Median Test (</span><em>P</em> value range of .54-1.0). Secondary outcome measures were similarly not statistically different between groups except for immediate improvements in rotation to the side opposite of pain, which favored DN, with an adjusted mean difference (95% confidence interval) of 7.85 (3.54-12.15) degrees.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The addition of DN to thoracic spinal manipulation and neck-specific exercise did not affect improvements in NDI score or numeric pain rating scale but showed an increase in cervical range of motion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475422001397\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475422001397","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究的目的是确定在胸椎操作和颈部特定运动中加入干针(DN)对颈部疼痛患者的直接影响。方法42例颈部疼痛患者随机分为真DN组(n = 21)和假DN组(n = 21),分别在首次就诊和2 ~ 3天后接受治疗。在第1天评估结果,包括基线和初始治疗后立即评估结果,在第二次治疗2至3天后评估结果,在第2次访问后5至7天评估结果。主要结果是颈部残疾指数(NDI)(0-50)和通过数字疼痛评定量表(0-10)进行的当前疼痛。次要结果为颈椎活动度、痛压阈值和整体变化评分。结果以基线值为协变量的重复测量协方差分析显示,随访时间点NDI评分无显著差异,调整后的平均差异(95%置信区间)为-0.11(-2.70 ~ 2.48)和0.31(-1.96 ~ 2.57)。独立样本中位数检验各组疼痛在各时间点均无差异(P值范围为0.54 ~ 1.0)。次要结局指标在两组之间相似地无统计学差异,除了向疼痛的另一侧旋转的立即改善,这有利于DN,调整后的平均差异(95%置信区间)为7.85(3.54-12.15)度。结论在胸椎操作和颈部专项运动的基础上增加DN并不影响NDI评分或数值疼痛评定量表的改善,但显示出颈椎活动范围的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immediate Effects of Adding Dry Needling to Thoracic Manipulation and Exercise in Cervical Range of Motion for Adults With Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine the immediate effects of adding dry needling (DN) to thoracic spine manipulation and neck-specific exercise in individuals with neck pain.

Methods

Forty-two participants with neck pain were randomized to either the true (n = 21) or sham (n = 21) DN groups, receiving treatment on the initial visit and 2 to 3 days later. Outcomes were assessed on day 1, both at baseline and immediately after the initial treatment, at the second treatment 2 to 3 days later, and at the final visit 5 to 7 days after visit 2. Primary outcomes were Neck Disability Index (NDI) (0-50) and current pain via numeric pain rating scale (0-10). Secondary outcomes were cervical range of motion, pain pressure threshold, and global rating of change.

Results

Repeated measures analysis of covariance with baseline value as covariate revealed no significant difference in NDI scores at either follow-up time point with adjusted mean differences (95% confidence interval) of -0.11 (-2.70 to 2.48) and 0.31 (-1.96 to 2.57). There were no between-group differences in pain at any time point via Independent-Samples Median Test (P value range of .54-1.0). Secondary outcome measures were similarly not statistically different between groups except for immediate improvements in rotation to the side opposite of pain, which favored DN, with an adjusted mean difference (95% confidence interval) of 7.85 (3.54-12.15) degrees.

Conclusion

The addition of DN to thoracic spinal manipulation and neck-specific exercise did not affect improvements in NDI score or numeric pain rating scale but showed an increase in cervical range of motion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信