婴幼儿心理健康和发育障碍诊断分类的临床应用和实施

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Marian E. Williams, Ashley M. Rediker, Kathleen Mulrooney
{"title":"婴幼儿心理健康和发育障碍诊断分类的临床应用和实施","authors":"Marian E. Williams,&nbsp;Ashley M. Rediker,&nbsp;Kathleen Mulrooney","doi":"10.1002/imhj.22054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The <i>Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood (DC: 0–5</i>) was developed to provide a framework for diagnosis of infants and young children, and a training curriculum supports implementation of the manual in clinical practice. This study surveyed 100 mental health clinicians (93% female and 53% Latinx/Hispanic) who had completed training in the DC: 0–5 classification system and worked with infants/young children and their families primarily in urban, public insurance-funded, community mental health settings in the United States. The survey explored their use of the diagnostic manual in clinical practice as well as supports and barriers to implementation. Survey results indicated a high level of adoption of the manual in clinical practice, although all five axes and the cultural formulation were used less often than the Axis I Clinical Disorders section. Barriers to implementation included systemic issues such as agency and billing requirements necessitating simultaneous use of other diagnostic manuals, lack of supports and expertise within their agency, and difficulty making time to fully utilize the manual. The findings suggest that policy and systems changes may be needed to enable clinicians to fully integrate the DC: 0–5 into their case conceptualizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/imhj.22054","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical use and implementation of the diagnostic classification of mental health and developmental disorders of infancy and early childhood\",\"authors\":\"Marian E. Williams,&nbsp;Ashley M. Rediker,&nbsp;Kathleen Mulrooney\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/imhj.22054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The <i>Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood (DC: 0–5</i>) was developed to provide a framework for diagnosis of infants and young children, and a training curriculum supports implementation of the manual in clinical practice. This study surveyed 100 mental health clinicians (93% female and 53% Latinx/Hispanic) who had completed training in the DC: 0–5 classification system and worked with infants/young children and their families primarily in urban, public insurance-funded, community mental health settings in the United States. The survey explored their use of the diagnostic manual in clinical practice as well as supports and barriers to implementation. Survey results indicated a high level of adoption of the manual in clinical practice, although all five axes and the cultural formulation were used less often than the Axis I Clinical Disorders section. Barriers to implementation included systemic issues such as agency and billing requirements necessitating simultaneous use of other diagnostic manuals, lack of supports and expertise within their agency, and difficulty making time to fully utilize the manual. The findings suggest that policy and systems changes may be needed to enable clinicians to fully integrate the DC: 0–5 into their case conceptualizations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/imhj.22054\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/imhj.22054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/imhj.22054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

制定了《婴幼儿心理健康和发育障碍诊断分类》(DC: 0-5),为婴幼儿的诊断提供了框架,并制定了培训课程,支持在临床实践中实施该手册。本研究调查了100名心理健康临床医生(93%为女性,53%为拉丁裔/西班牙裔),他们完成了DC: 0-5分类系统的培训,主要在美国城市、公共保险资助的社区心理健康机构与婴儿/幼儿及其家庭一起工作。调查探讨了他们在临床实践中使用诊断手册,以及支持和实施的障碍。调查结果表明,在临床实践中,手册的采用程度很高,尽管所有五个轴和文化公式的使用频率低于轴I临床障碍部分。实施的障碍包括系统问题,例如机构和计费要求需要同时使用其他诊断手册,机构内缺乏支持和专门知识,以及难以抽出时间充分利用手册。研究结果表明,可能需要改变政策和制度,使临床医生能够将DC: 0-5完全整合到他们的病例概念中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical use and implementation of the diagnostic classification of mental health and developmental disorders of infancy and early childhood

Clinical use and implementation of the diagnostic classification of mental health and developmental disorders of infancy and early childhood

The Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood (DC: 0–5) was developed to provide a framework for diagnosis of infants and young children, and a training curriculum supports implementation of the manual in clinical practice. This study surveyed 100 mental health clinicians (93% female and 53% Latinx/Hispanic) who had completed training in the DC: 0–5 classification system and worked with infants/young children and their families primarily in urban, public insurance-funded, community mental health settings in the United States. The survey explored their use of the diagnostic manual in clinical practice as well as supports and barriers to implementation. Survey results indicated a high level of adoption of the manual in clinical practice, although all five axes and the cultural formulation were used less often than the Axis I Clinical Disorders section. Barriers to implementation included systemic issues such as agency and billing requirements necessitating simultaneous use of other diagnostic manuals, lack of supports and expertise within their agency, and difficulty making time to fully utilize the manual. The findings suggest that policy and systems changes may be needed to enable clinicians to fully integrate the DC: 0–5 into their case conceptualizations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信