脂质乳剂对异丙酚的催眠作用比硫胺醛对小鼠的催眠作用更大。

IF 2.2 4区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Experimental Animals Pub Date : 2023-11-09 Epub Date: 2023-06-02 DOI:10.1538/expanim.23-0010
Michiko Higashi, Saori Taharabaru, Yushi U Adachi, Maiko Satomoto, Takahiro Tamura, Naoyuki Matsuda, Aiji Sato-Boku, Masahiro Okuda
{"title":"脂质乳剂对异丙酚的催眠作用比硫胺醛对小鼠的催眠作用更大。","authors":"Michiko Higashi, Saori Taharabaru, Yushi U Adachi, Maiko Satomoto, Takahiro Tamura, Naoyuki Matsuda, Aiji Sato-Boku, Masahiro Okuda","doi":"10.1538/expanim.23-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Administration in a lipid emulsion can modify the pharmacodynamics of drugs via a process known as lipid resuscitation. However, the detailed mechanism remains unclear. We studied the volume and another pharmacodynamic effect, the lipid sink, using propofol and thiamylal. Male adult mice (ddY) were intravenously administered 10 ml/kg propofol or thiamylal diluted with physiological saline, 10% soybean oil, or 20% soybean oil. The 50% effective dose (ED<sub>50</sub>) for achieving hypnosis was calculated using probit analysis. To investigate the volume effect, 0, 10, or 20 ml/kg of saline or soybean oil was administered, either simultaneously or beforehand. Next, a two- or three-fold dose of the anesthetics was administered and the durations of anesthesia were measured. Finally, at 30 s after the first injection, supplemental soybean oil was administered. The mean (± SE) ED<sub>50</sub> values of propofol and thiamylal were 5.79 mg/kg (0.61) and 8.83 mg/kg (0.84), respectively. Lipid dilution increased the ED<sub>50</sub> values of both anesthetics. After injection of a dose two-fold the ED<sub>50</sub> value, the respective mean (± SD) durations of anesthesia were 125 ± 35 s and 102 ± 38 s. Supplemental administration of soybean oil significantly shortened the duration of anesthesia of propofol, but not that of thiamylal. The results indicate that administration of a lipid emulsion vitiated the anesthetic effect of propofol by reducing the non-emulsified free fraction in the aqueous phase, which may elucidate the lipid resuscitation likely caused by the lipid sink mechanism.</p>","PeriodicalId":12102,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Animals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10658092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Administration of lipid emulsion reduced the hypnotic potency of propofol more than that of thiamylal in mice.\",\"authors\":\"Michiko Higashi, Saori Taharabaru, Yushi U Adachi, Maiko Satomoto, Takahiro Tamura, Naoyuki Matsuda, Aiji Sato-Boku, Masahiro Okuda\",\"doi\":\"10.1538/expanim.23-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Administration in a lipid emulsion can modify the pharmacodynamics of drugs via a process known as lipid resuscitation. However, the detailed mechanism remains unclear. We studied the volume and another pharmacodynamic effect, the lipid sink, using propofol and thiamylal. Male adult mice (ddY) were intravenously administered 10 ml/kg propofol or thiamylal diluted with physiological saline, 10% soybean oil, or 20% soybean oil. The 50% effective dose (ED<sub>50</sub>) for achieving hypnosis was calculated using probit analysis. To investigate the volume effect, 0, 10, or 20 ml/kg of saline or soybean oil was administered, either simultaneously or beforehand. Next, a two- or three-fold dose of the anesthetics was administered and the durations of anesthesia were measured. Finally, at 30 s after the first injection, supplemental soybean oil was administered. The mean (± SE) ED<sub>50</sub> values of propofol and thiamylal were 5.79 mg/kg (0.61) and 8.83 mg/kg (0.84), respectively. Lipid dilution increased the ED<sub>50</sub> values of both anesthetics. After injection of a dose two-fold the ED<sub>50</sub> value, the respective mean (± SD) durations of anesthesia were 125 ± 35 s and 102 ± 38 s. Supplemental administration of soybean oil significantly shortened the duration of anesthesia of propofol, but not that of thiamylal. The results indicate that administration of a lipid emulsion vitiated the anesthetic effect of propofol by reducing the non-emulsified free fraction in the aqueous phase, which may elucidate the lipid resuscitation likely caused by the lipid sink mechanism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Animals\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10658092/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Animals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim.23-0010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim.23-0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脂质乳剂给药可以通过一个称为脂质复苏的过程来改变药物的药效学。然而,具体机制尚不清楚。我们研究了丙泊酚和硫胺醇的体积和另一种药效学效应,即脂质库。雄性成年小鼠(ddY)静脉内给予用生理盐水、10%大豆油或20%大豆油稀释的10ml/kg丙泊酚或噻氨酰。使用probit分析计算实现催眠的50%有效剂量(ED50)。为了研究体积效应,同时或预先给予0、10或20ml/kg的生理盐水或大豆油。接下来,给药两倍或三倍剂量的麻醉剂,并测量麻醉持续时间。最后,在第一次注射后30秒,给予补充的大豆油。丙泊酚和噻氨酰的ED50平均值(±SE)分别为5.79mg/kg(0.61)和8.83mg/kg(0.84)。脂质稀释增加了两种麻醉剂的ED50值。在注射ED50值两倍的剂量后,麻醉的平均(±SD)持续时间分别为125±35s和102±38s。补充大豆油显著缩短了丙泊酚的麻醉持续时间,但没有缩短硫胺醇的麻醉持续。结果表明,脂质乳剂的给药通过减少水相中未乳化的游离部分而损害了丙泊酚的麻醉效果,这可能阐明脂质库机制可能引起的脂质复苏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Administration of lipid emulsion reduced the hypnotic potency of propofol more than that of thiamylal in mice.

Administration in a lipid emulsion can modify the pharmacodynamics of drugs via a process known as lipid resuscitation. However, the detailed mechanism remains unclear. We studied the volume and another pharmacodynamic effect, the lipid sink, using propofol and thiamylal. Male adult mice (ddY) were intravenously administered 10 ml/kg propofol or thiamylal diluted with physiological saline, 10% soybean oil, or 20% soybean oil. The 50% effective dose (ED50) for achieving hypnosis was calculated using probit analysis. To investigate the volume effect, 0, 10, or 20 ml/kg of saline or soybean oil was administered, either simultaneously or beforehand. Next, a two- or three-fold dose of the anesthetics was administered and the durations of anesthesia were measured. Finally, at 30 s after the first injection, supplemental soybean oil was administered. The mean (± SE) ED50 values of propofol and thiamylal were 5.79 mg/kg (0.61) and 8.83 mg/kg (0.84), respectively. Lipid dilution increased the ED50 values of both anesthetics. After injection of a dose two-fold the ED50 value, the respective mean (± SD) durations of anesthesia were 125 ± 35 s and 102 ± 38 s. Supplemental administration of soybean oil significantly shortened the duration of anesthesia of propofol, but not that of thiamylal. The results indicate that administration of a lipid emulsion vitiated the anesthetic effect of propofol by reducing the non-emulsified free fraction in the aqueous phase, which may elucidate the lipid resuscitation likely caused by the lipid sink mechanism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Animals
Experimental Animals 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
2
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of this international journal is to accelerate progress in laboratory animal experimentation and disseminate relevant information in related areas through publication of peer reviewed Original papers and Review articles. The journal covers basic to applied biomedical research centering around use of experimental animals and also covers topics related to experimental animals such as technology, management, and animal welfare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信