Ahmad Shavakhi, Mehdi Zobeiri, Mahsa Khodadoostan, Mohammad Javad Zobeiri, Alireza Shavakhi
{"title":"ercp相关并发症的危险因素及ASGE分级系统的具体作用。","authors":"Ahmad Shavakhi, Mehdi Zobeiri, Mahsa Khodadoostan, Mohammad Javad Zobeiri, Alireza Shavakhi","doi":"10.4103/jrms.jrms_150_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is one of the main therapeutic and sometimes diagnostic methods in biliary and pancreatic diseases. A grading system for the difficulty of ERCP (grade one to four, the higher grade represents the more complexity of the procedure) has been developed by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). This study aimed to assess the prevalence of ERCP-related complications, their common risk factors, and specifically the role of difficulty of the procedure based on ASGE grading.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was performed on 620 ERCP-operated patients over 4 years in two tertiary referral centers affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Data about the difficulty of procedures based on the ASGE grading scale, complications including pancreatitis, bleeding, infection, perforation, arrhythmia, respiratory suppression, aspiration, and major common risk factors were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of complications was 11.6% including pancreatitis 8.2%, perforation 0.8%, gastrointestinal bleeding 1.3%, cholangitis 2.4%, and cardiopulmonary problems 0.5% (arrhythmia 0.3% and respiratory depression 0.2%). Patients with pancreatic contrast injection (66.7% vs. 11.3% <i>P</i> = 0.04) and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) (44.4% vs. 11.1%; <i>P</i> = 0.01) showed a statistically significant higher overall complication rate. The association of these risk factors remained significant in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Patients with pancreatic contrast injection also showed a statistically significant higher prevalence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (66.7% vs. 11.3% <i>P</i> = 0.04). Furthermore, a significantly higher prevalence of arrhythmia (3.6% vs. 0; <i>P</i> = 0.008) was observed among patients with difficult cannulation. Based on the ASGE difficulty grading score, most of the patients were classified as grade 2 (74.2%) and 3 and 4 (23.4%). No statistically significant difference was noted between the difficulty-based groups in terms of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study showed that the most critical risk factors of ERCP-induced complications were pancreatic contrast injection and SOD. ASGE grading scale for ERCP complexity did not predict the occurrence of complications in our study population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"28 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/c7/JRMS-28-7.PMC10039106.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for ERCP-related complications and what is the specific role of ASGE grading system.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Shavakhi, Mehdi Zobeiri, Mahsa Khodadoostan, Mohammad Javad Zobeiri, Alireza Shavakhi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jrms.jrms_150_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is one of the main therapeutic and sometimes diagnostic methods in biliary and pancreatic diseases. A grading system for the difficulty of ERCP (grade one to four, the higher grade represents the more complexity of the procedure) has been developed by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). This study aimed to assess the prevalence of ERCP-related complications, their common risk factors, and specifically the role of difficulty of the procedure based on ASGE grading.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was performed on 620 ERCP-operated patients over 4 years in two tertiary referral centers affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Data about the difficulty of procedures based on the ASGE grading scale, complications including pancreatitis, bleeding, infection, perforation, arrhythmia, respiratory suppression, aspiration, and major common risk factors were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of complications was 11.6% including pancreatitis 8.2%, perforation 0.8%, gastrointestinal bleeding 1.3%, cholangitis 2.4%, and cardiopulmonary problems 0.5% (arrhythmia 0.3% and respiratory depression 0.2%). Patients with pancreatic contrast injection (66.7% vs. 11.3% <i>P</i> = 0.04) and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) (44.4% vs. 11.1%; <i>P</i> = 0.01) showed a statistically significant higher overall complication rate. The association of these risk factors remained significant in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Patients with pancreatic contrast injection also showed a statistically significant higher prevalence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (66.7% vs. 11.3% <i>P</i> = 0.04). Furthermore, a significantly higher prevalence of arrhythmia (3.6% vs. 0; <i>P</i> = 0.008) was observed among patients with difficult cannulation. Based on the ASGE difficulty grading score, most of the patients were classified as grade 2 (74.2%) and 3 and 4 (23.4%). No statistically significant difference was noted between the difficulty-based groups in terms of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study showed that the most critical risk factors of ERCP-induced complications were pancreatic contrast injection and SOD. ASGE grading scale for ERCP complexity did not predict the occurrence of complications in our study population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/c7/JRMS-28-7.PMC10039106.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_150_22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_150_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)是胆胰疾病的主要治疗和诊断方法之一。美国胃肠内窥镜学会(ASGE)制定了ERCP难度分级系统(1 - 4级,等级越高表示手术越复杂)。本研究旨在评估ercp相关并发症的患病率,其常见的危险因素,特别是基于ASGE分级的手术难度的作用。材料和方法:本横断面研究在伊斯法罕医科大学附属的两个三级转诊中心进行了为期4年的620例ercp手术患者。收集基于ASGE分级量表的手术难度、并发症包括胰腺炎、出血、感染、穿孔、心律失常、呼吸抑制、抽吸和主要常见危险因素的数据。结果:总并发症发生率为11.6%,其中胰腺炎8.2%,穿孔0.8%,胃肠道出血1.3%,胆管炎2.4%,心肺问题0.5%(心律失常0.3%,呼吸抑制0.2%)。胰对比剂注射患者(66.7% vs. 11.3% P = 0.04)和Oddi括约肌功能障碍(SOD)患者(44.4% vs. 11.1%;P = 0.01),总并发症发生率有统计学意义。在多变量logistic回归分析中,这些危险因素的相关性仍然显著。注射胰腺造影剂的患者ercp后胰腺炎患病率也有统计学意义(66.7%比11.3% P = 0.04)。此外,心律失常的患病率明显更高(3.6% vs. 0;P = 0.008)。根据ASGE难度分级评分,大部分患者分为2级(74.2%)、3级和4级(23.4%)。在并发症方面,以困难为基础的组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:目前的研究表明,胰对比剂注射和SOD是ercp所致并发症最关键的危险因素。在我们的研究人群中,ASGE ERCP复杂性分级量表不能预测并发症的发生。
Risk factors for ERCP-related complications and what is the specific role of ASGE grading system.
Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is one of the main therapeutic and sometimes diagnostic methods in biliary and pancreatic diseases. A grading system for the difficulty of ERCP (grade one to four, the higher grade represents the more complexity of the procedure) has been developed by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). This study aimed to assess the prevalence of ERCP-related complications, their common risk factors, and specifically the role of difficulty of the procedure based on ASGE grading.
Material and methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 620 ERCP-operated patients over 4 years in two tertiary referral centers affiliated with Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Data about the difficulty of procedures based on the ASGE grading scale, complications including pancreatitis, bleeding, infection, perforation, arrhythmia, respiratory suppression, aspiration, and major common risk factors were collected.
Results: The overall prevalence of complications was 11.6% including pancreatitis 8.2%, perforation 0.8%, gastrointestinal bleeding 1.3%, cholangitis 2.4%, and cardiopulmonary problems 0.5% (arrhythmia 0.3% and respiratory depression 0.2%). Patients with pancreatic contrast injection (66.7% vs. 11.3% P = 0.04) and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) (44.4% vs. 11.1%; P = 0.01) showed a statistically significant higher overall complication rate. The association of these risk factors remained significant in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Patients with pancreatic contrast injection also showed a statistically significant higher prevalence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (66.7% vs. 11.3% P = 0.04). Furthermore, a significantly higher prevalence of arrhythmia (3.6% vs. 0; P = 0.008) was observed among patients with difficult cannulation. Based on the ASGE difficulty grading score, most of the patients were classified as grade 2 (74.2%) and 3 and 4 (23.4%). No statistically significant difference was noted between the difficulty-based groups in terms of complications.
Conclusion: The current study showed that the most critical risk factors of ERCP-induced complications were pancreatic contrast injection and SOD. ASGE grading scale for ERCP complexity did not predict the occurrence of complications in our study population.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online continuous journal with print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jmsjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.