医疗保健质量评估业务卓越模型的实施:系统回顾。

Eman Kamal
{"title":"医疗保健质量评估业务卓越模型的实施:系统回顾。","authors":"Eman Kamal","doi":"10.36401/JQSH-22-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment of healthcare facility quality using business excellence models provides valuable information about performance gaps, which can be used to improve performance. Within the excellence framework, the \"result\" domain presents more challenges in terms of improvement over time. Using European and American business excellence-based models (EFQM and Balridge, respectively), this review aims to highlight the impact of quality assessment on the improvement of healthcare performance results. A literature search was performed using PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL databases. PRISMA guidelines were followed. All the articles were evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Tool. Thematic analysis was conducted following Thomas and Harden's approach, and confidence levels were determined using the GRADE-CERQual method. Nine studies were included. Two main themes emerged: 1) the assessment highlighted improvement in some results; and 2) the assessment highlighted areas that need improvement. The assessments focused mostly on customer-based results and least on society-based results. Six out of nine included studies did not show improvement in the desired results after a one-time assessment; however, no recommendations to improve quality were given to the facility after the assessments. Unless there is continuity in the assessment process, the desired results may not improve.</p>","PeriodicalId":73170,"journal":{"name":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","volume":"6 1","pages":"15-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/36/86/i2589-9449-6-1-15.PMC10229027.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of Business Excellence Models in Healthcare for Quality Assessment: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Eman Kamal\",\"doi\":\"10.36401/JQSH-22-10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The assessment of healthcare facility quality using business excellence models provides valuable information about performance gaps, which can be used to improve performance. Within the excellence framework, the \\\"result\\\" domain presents more challenges in terms of improvement over time. Using European and American business excellence-based models (EFQM and Balridge, respectively), this review aims to highlight the impact of quality assessment on the improvement of healthcare performance results. A literature search was performed using PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL databases. PRISMA guidelines were followed. All the articles were evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Tool. Thematic analysis was conducted following Thomas and Harden's approach, and confidence levels were determined using the GRADE-CERQual method. Nine studies were included. Two main themes emerged: 1) the assessment highlighted improvement in some results; and 2) the assessment highlighted areas that need improvement. The assessments focused mostly on customer-based results and least on society-based results. Six out of nine included studies did not show improvement in the desired results after a one-time assessment; however, no recommendations to improve quality were given to the facility after the assessments. Unless there is continuity in the assessment process, the desired results may not improve.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"15-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/36/86/i2589-9449-6-1-15.PMC10229027.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-22-10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-22-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用业务卓越模型对医疗保健设施质量进行评估,可提供有关性能差距的宝贵信息,这些信息可用于改进性能。在卓越框架中,“结果”领域随着时间的推移提出了更多的改进挑战。使用欧洲和美国基于业务卓越的模型(分别为EFQM和Balridge),本综述旨在强调质量评估对改善医疗保健绩效结果的影响。使用PubMed、SCOPUS和CINAHL数据库进行文献检索。遵循PRISMA准则。所有的文章都使用关键评估技能程序(CASP)工具进行评估。按照Thomas和Harden的方法进行主题分析,并使用GRADE-CERQual方法确定置信水平。纳入了9项研究。出现了两个主要主题:1)评估突出了某些结果的改善;2)评估突出了需要改进的地方。评估主要侧重于基于客户的结果,而对基于社会的结果关注最少。9项纳入的研究中有6项在一次性评估后没有显示预期结果的改善;然而,在评估之后,没有对该设施提出改善质量的建议。除非在评估过程中有连续性,否则期望的结果可能不会得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Implementation of Business Excellence Models in Healthcare for Quality Assessment: A Systematic Review.

Implementation of Business Excellence Models in Healthcare for Quality Assessment: A Systematic Review.

The assessment of healthcare facility quality using business excellence models provides valuable information about performance gaps, which can be used to improve performance. Within the excellence framework, the "result" domain presents more challenges in terms of improvement over time. Using European and American business excellence-based models (EFQM and Balridge, respectively), this review aims to highlight the impact of quality assessment on the improvement of healthcare performance results. A literature search was performed using PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL databases. PRISMA guidelines were followed. All the articles were evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Tool. Thematic analysis was conducted following Thomas and Harden's approach, and confidence levels were determined using the GRADE-CERQual method. Nine studies were included. Two main themes emerged: 1) the assessment highlighted improvement in some results; and 2) the assessment highlighted areas that need improvement. The assessments focused mostly on customer-based results and least on society-based results. Six out of nine included studies did not show improvement in the desired results after a one-time assessment; however, no recommendations to improve quality were given to the facility after the assessments. Unless there is continuity in the assessment process, the desired results may not improve.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信