闭孔神经阻滞在经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术中的应用。

Q2 Medicine
Aleksandra Gavrilovska-Brzanov, Skender Seidi, Sotir Stavridis, Ognen Ivanovski, Josif Janchulev, Viktor Stankov, Marija Jovanovski Srceva, Biljana Kuzmanovska
{"title":"闭孔神经阻滞在经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术中的应用。","authors":"Aleksandra Gavrilovska-Brzanov,&nbsp;Skender Seidi,&nbsp;Sotir Stavridis,&nbsp;Ognen Ivanovski,&nbsp;Josif Janchulev,&nbsp;Viktor Stankov,&nbsp;Marija Jovanovski Srceva,&nbsp;Biljana Kuzmanovska","doi":"10.5455/medarh.2023.77.118-122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bladder tumors are identified and treated using a surgical procedure called as transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TUR-BT). During TUR-BT resection, stimulation of the obturator nerve may cause violent adductor muscle spasms. The \"obturator reflex,\" as this disorder is known, generally causes the legs to move inadvertently (leg jerking). Since this condition can cause several complications, it is preferable to avoid it.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of spinal anesthesia combined with obturator nerve block or general anesthetic without muscle relaxant in preventing adductor muscle spasm during TUR-BT procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty consecutive patients were enrolled in a prospective observational evaluation and divided into two groups. Patients in Group I underwent spinal anesthesia along with an obturator nerve block, while those in Group II underwent general anesthesia without a neuromuscular relaxant. The following details were recorded: time for obturator block performance, the severity of the motor blockade, the length of the procedure in both groups because a probable adductor spasm might make it more difficult. The level of the surgeon's pleasure was noted throughout the surgery. Additionally, the patient's satisfaction and any issues that may have arisen were documented (the incidence of vascular puncture, hematoma, nerve damage, and visceral injury was noted).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Block performance time in Group I was 4.8±0.5 minutes, whereas it was 5.0±0.3 minutes in Group II. The ease of access for the two groups was the same. Group I demonstrated increased patient and surgeon satisfaction with a general anesthesia without neuromuscular relaxants and an obturatorius nerve block. Mean surgical time did not differ between the groups.There were no complications in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During such operations, routine use of ONB in combination with spinal anaesthetic or general anesthetic without a neuromuscular blocker can enhance oncological outcomes for patients, reduce complication rates, and extend the period of time spent living without disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":18421,"journal":{"name":"Medicinski arhiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3b/29/medarch-77-118.PMC10227847.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obturator Nerve Block for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandra Gavrilovska-Brzanov,&nbsp;Skender Seidi,&nbsp;Sotir Stavridis,&nbsp;Ognen Ivanovski,&nbsp;Josif Janchulev,&nbsp;Viktor Stankov,&nbsp;Marija Jovanovski Srceva,&nbsp;Biljana Kuzmanovska\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/medarh.2023.77.118-122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bladder tumors are identified and treated using a surgical procedure called as transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TUR-BT). During TUR-BT resection, stimulation of the obturator nerve may cause violent adductor muscle spasms. The \\\"obturator reflex,\\\" as this disorder is known, generally causes the legs to move inadvertently (leg jerking). Since this condition can cause several complications, it is preferable to avoid it.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of spinal anesthesia combined with obturator nerve block or general anesthetic without muscle relaxant in preventing adductor muscle spasm during TUR-BT procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty consecutive patients were enrolled in a prospective observational evaluation and divided into two groups. Patients in Group I underwent spinal anesthesia along with an obturator nerve block, while those in Group II underwent general anesthesia without a neuromuscular relaxant. The following details were recorded: time for obturator block performance, the severity of the motor blockade, the length of the procedure in both groups because a probable adductor spasm might make it more difficult. The level of the surgeon's pleasure was noted throughout the surgery. Additionally, the patient's satisfaction and any issues that may have arisen were documented (the incidence of vascular puncture, hematoma, nerve damage, and visceral injury was noted).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Block performance time in Group I was 4.8±0.5 minutes, whereas it was 5.0±0.3 minutes in Group II. The ease of access for the two groups was the same. Group I demonstrated increased patient and surgeon satisfaction with a general anesthesia without neuromuscular relaxants and an obturatorius nerve block. Mean surgical time did not differ between the groups.There were no complications in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During such operations, routine use of ONB in combination with spinal anaesthetic or general anesthetic without a neuromuscular blocker can enhance oncological outcomes for patients, reduce complication rates, and extend the period of time spent living without disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicinski arhiv\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3b/29/medarch-77-118.PMC10227847.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicinski arhiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2023.77.118-122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinski arhiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2023.77.118-122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:膀胱肿瘤的识别和治疗采用经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(turt - bt)。在turt - bt切除过程中,对闭孔神经的刺激可引起剧烈的内收肌痉挛。这种疾病被称为“闭孔反射”,通常会导致腿部无意识地移动(腿抽搐)。由于这种情况会引起一些并发症,最好避免它。目的:在本研究中,我们探讨脊髓麻醉联合闭孔神经阻滞或全身麻醉不加肌肉松弛剂在turt - bt手术中预防内收肌痉挛的有效性。方法:连续40例患者进行前瞻性观察性评价,分为两组。第一组患者行脊髓麻醉并封闭神经阻滞,而第二组患者行全身麻醉,不使用神经肌肉松弛剂。记录以下细节:闭孔阻滞的时间,运动阻滞的严重程度,两组手术的长度,因为可能的内收肌痉挛会使手术更加困难。外科医生的快乐程度在整个手术过程中被记录下来。此外,记录患者的满意度和可能出现的任何问题(血管穿刺、血肿、神经损伤和内脏损伤的发生率)。结果:ⅰ组阻滞时间为4.8±0.5 min,ⅱ组阻滞时间为5.0±0.3 min。两组的访问难度是相同的。第一组患者和外科医生对全麻不使用神经肌肉松弛剂和闭孔神经阻滞的满意度增加。两组间平均手术时间无差异。两组均无并发症发生。结论:在此类手术中,常规使用ONB联合脊髓麻醉或全身麻醉(不使用神经肌肉阻滞剂)可提高患者的肿瘤预后,减少并发症发生率,延长无病生存时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Obturator Nerve Block for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors.

Obturator Nerve Block for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors.

Background: Bladder tumors are identified and treated using a surgical procedure called as transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TUR-BT). During TUR-BT resection, stimulation of the obturator nerve may cause violent adductor muscle spasms. The "obturator reflex," as this disorder is known, generally causes the legs to move inadvertently (leg jerking). Since this condition can cause several complications, it is preferable to avoid it.

Objective: In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of spinal anesthesia combined with obturator nerve block or general anesthetic without muscle relaxant in preventing adductor muscle spasm during TUR-BT procedures.

Methods: Forty consecutive patients were enrolled in a prospective observational evaluation and divided into two groups. Patients in Group I underwent spinal anesthesia along with an obturator nerve block, while those in Group II underwent general anesthesia without a neuromuscular relaxant. The following details were recorded: time for obturator block performance, the severity of the motor blockade, the length of the procedure in both groups because a probable adductor spasm might make it more difficult. The level of the surgeon's pleasure was noted throughout the surgery. Additionally, the patient's satisfaction and any issues that may have arisen were documented (the incidence of vascular puncture, hematoma, nerve damage, and visceral injury was noted).

Results: Block performance time in Group I was 4.8±0.5 minutes, whereas it was 5.0±0.3 minutes in Group II. The ease of access for the two groups was the same. Group I demonstrated increased patient and surgeon satisfaction with a general anesthesia without neuromuscular relaxants and an obturatorius nerve block. Mean surgical time did not differ between the groups.There were no complications in either group.

Conclusion: During such operations, routine use of ONB in combination with spinal anaesthetic or general anesthetic without a neuromuscular blocker can enhance oncological outcomes for patients, reduce complication rates, and extend the period of time spent living without disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicinski arhiv
Medicinski arhiv Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信