自我报告的编码质量会导致诱饵被拒绝和误报。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Learning & memory Pub Date : 2023-05-04 Print Date: 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1101/lm.053751.123
Christopher N Wahlheim, Sydney M Garlitch, Rawan M Mohamed, Blaire J Weidler
{"title":"自我报告的编码质量会导致诱饵被拒绝和误报。","authors":"Christopher N Wahlheim, Sydney M Garlitch, Rawan M Mohamed, Blaire J Weidler","doi":"10.1101/lm.053751.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The hippocampus supports distinctive encoding, enabling discrimination of perceptions from similar memories. Here, an experimental and individual differences approach examined the role of encoding quality in the classification of similar lures. An object recognition task included thought probes during study and similar lures at test. On-task study reports were associated with lure discrimination in within-subject and between-subjects analyses. Within-subject on-task reports were also associated with false classifications of lures as studied objects. These results are compatible with the view that quality encoding supports memory-based rejection of lures but also engenders false alarms when perceptions and memories are inaccurately compared.</p>","PeriodicalId":18003,"journal":{"name":"Learning & memory","volume":"30 4","pages":"96-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165994/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-reported encoding quality promotes lure rejections and false alarms.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher N Wahlheim, Sydney M Garlitch, Rawan M Mohamed, Blaire J Weidler\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/lm.053751.123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The hippocampus supports distinctive encoding, enabling discrimination of perceptions from similar memories. Here, an experimental and individual differences approach examined the role of encoding quality in the classification of similar lures. An object recognition task included thought probes during study and similar lures at test. On-task study reports were associated with lure discrimination in within-subject and between-subjects analyses. Within-subject on-task reports were also associated with false classifications of lures as studied objects. These results are compatible with the view that quality encoding supports memory-based rejection of lures but also engenders false alarms when perceptions and memories are inaccurately compared.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning & memory\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"96-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165994/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning & memory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.053751.123\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & memory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.053751.123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海马支持独特编码,从而能够从相似记忆中分辨出感知。本文采用实验和个体差异的方法研究了编码质量在相似诱饵分类中的作用。物体识别任务包括学习时的思维探针和测试时的相似诱饵。在主体内和主体间分析中,任务学习报告与诱饵辨别相关。主体内的任务报告也与将诱饵错误分类为研究对象有关。这些结果与以下观点相吻合:质量编码支持基于记忆的对诱饵的排斥,但当感知与记忆不准确比较时,也会产生错误警报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-reported encoding quality promotes lure rejections and false alarms.

The hippocampus supports distinctive encoding, enabling discrimination of perceptions from similar memories. Here, an experimental and individual differences approach examined the role of encoding quality in the classification of similar lures. An object recognition task included thought probes during study and similar lures at test. On-task study reports were associated with lure discrimination in within-subject and between-subjects analyses. Within-subject on-task reports were also associated with false classifications of lures as studied objects. These results are compatible with the view that quality encoding supports memory-based rejection of lures but also engenders false alarms when perceptions and memories are inaccurately compared.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning & memory
Learning & memory 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The neurobiology of learning and memory is entering a new interdisciplinary era. Advances in neuropsychology have identified regions of brain tissue that are critical for certain types of function. Electrophysiological techniques have revealed behavioral correlates of neuronal activity. Studies of synaptic plasticity suggest that some mechanisms of memory formation may resemble those of neural development. And molecular approaches have identified genes with patterns of expression that influence behavior. It is clear that future progress depends on interdisciplinary investigations. The current literature of learning and memory is large but fragmented. Until now, there has been no single journal devoted to this area of study and no dominant journal that demands attention by serious workers in the area, regardless of specialty. Learning & Memory provides a forum for these investigations in the form of research papers and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信