对首次线圈栓塞后再堵塞的脑动脉瘤进行延伸监测:重复线圈栓塞的安全性和持久性

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jin Woo Bae , Han San Oh , Chang-eui Hong , Kang Min Kim , Dong Hyun Yoo , Hyun-Seung Kang , Young Dae Cho
{"title":"对首次线圈栓塞后再堵塞的脑动脉瘤进行延伸监测:重复线圈栓塞的安全性和持久性","authors":"Jin Woo Bae ,&nbsp;Han San Oh ,&nbsp;Chang-eui Hong ,&nbsp;Kang Min Kim ,&nbsp;Dong Hyun Yoo ,&nbsp;Hyun-Seung Kang ,&nbsp;Young Dae Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.neurad.2023.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>In the endovascular era, postcoiling recanalization of cerebral aneurysms is occurring with greater frequency. Repeat coiling is usually done to prevent rebleeding, although long-term outcomes of re-embolization have yet to be adequately investigated. The present study was undertaken to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes of re-embolization in recanalized aneurysms, focusing on procedural safety, efficacy, and durability.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>In this retrospective review, we examined 308 patients with 310 recurrent aneurysms. All lesions were re-coiled, once major recanalization (after initial coil embolization) was established. Medical records and radiologic data amassed during extended follow-up were then subject to review. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was undertaken to identify risk factors for subsequent recurrence.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>During a lengthy follow-up (mean, 40.2 ± 33.0 months), major recanalization developed again in 87 aneurysms (28.1%). Multivariable Cox regression analysis linked re-recanalization to initial saccular neck width (<em>p</em>=.003) and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD; <em>p</em>&lt;.001). Stent implantation (<em>p</em>=.038) and successful occlusion at second coiling (<em>p</em>=.012) were protective against later recanalization in this setting. The more recent the second embolization was performed, the lower the risk of further recurrence (<em>p</em>=.023). Procedure-related complications included asymptomatic thromboembolism (<em>n</em> = 9), transient ischemic neurologic deficits (<em>n</em> = 2), procedural bleeding (<em>n</em> = 1), and coil migration (<em>n</em> = 1), but there were no residual effects or deaths.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Repeat coil embolization is a safe therapeutic option for recanalized cerebral aneurysms. Wide-necked status and ADPKD emerged as risks for subsequent recanalization, whereas successful occlusion and stent implantation seemed to reduce the likelihood of recurrence after re-embolization procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extended monitoring of re-coiled cerebral aneurysms after initial postcoiling recanalization: Safety and durability of repeat coil embolization\",\"authors\":\"Jin Woo Bae ,&nbsp;Han San Oh ,&nbsp;Chang-eui Hong ,&nbsp;Kang Min Kim ,&nbsp;Dong Hyun Yoo ,&nbsp;Hyun-Seung Kang ,&nbsp;Young Dae Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurad.2023.05.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>In the endovascular era, postcoiling recanalization of cerebral aneurysms is occurring with greater frequency. Repeat coiling is usually done to prevent rebleeding, although long-term outcomes of re-embolization have yet to be adequately investigated. The present study was undertaken to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes of re-embolization in recanalized aneurysms, focusing on procedural safety, efficacy, and durability.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>In this retrospective review, we examined 308 patients with 310 recurrent aneurysms. All lesions were re-coiled, once major recanalization (after initial coil embolization) was established. Medical records and radiologic data amassed during extended follow-up were then subject to review. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was undertaken to identify risk factors for subsequent recurrence.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>During a lengthy follow-up (mean, 40.2 ± 33.0 months), major recanalization developed again in 87 aneurysms (28.1%). Multivariable Cox regression analysis linked re-recanalization to initial saccular neck width (<em>p</em>=.003) and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD; <em>p</em>&lt;.001). Stent implantation (<em>p</em>=.038) and successful occlusion at second coiling (<em>p</em>=.012) were protective against later recanalization in this setting. The more recent the second embolization was performed, the lower the risk of further recurrence (<em>p</em>=.023). Procedure-related complications included asymptomatic thromboembolism (<em>n</em> = 9), transient ischemic neurologic deficits (<em>n</em> = 2), procedural bleeding (<em>n</em> = 1), and coil migration (<em>n</em> = 1), but there were no residual effects or deaths.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Repeat coil embolization is a safe therapeutic option for recanalized cerebral aneurysms. Wide-necked status and ADPKD emerged as risks for subsequent recanalization, whereas successful occlusion and stent implantation seemed to reduce the likelihood of recurrence after re-embolization procedures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986123002110\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986123002110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 在血管内治疗时代,脑动脉瘤盘旋后再栓塞的发生率越来越高。尽管再栓塞的长期疗效尚未得到充分研究,但为了防止再出血,通常会进行再次栓塞。本研究旨在评估再栓塞动脉瘤的临床和影像学结果,重点关注程序的安全性、有效性和持久性。方法在这项回顾性研究中,我们对 308 名患者的 310 个复发性动脉瘤进行了检查。所有病变在确定主要再通(初始线圈栓塞后)后都重新进行了线圈栓塞。随后,我们对长期随访期间积累的病历和放射学数据进行了审查。结果在长期随访期间(平均 40.2 ± 33.0 个月),有 87 个动脉瘤(28.1%)再次出现大面积再闭塞。多变量考克斯回归分析将再狭窄与最初的囊颈宽度(p=.003)和常染色体显性多囊肾(ADPKD;p<.001)联系起来。在这种情况下,支架植入(p=.038)和第二次栓塞成功(p=.012)对以后的再狭窄具有保护作用。第二次栓塞的时间越近,进一步复发的风险越低(p=.023)。手术相关并发症包括无症状血栓栓塞(9 例)、一过性缺血性神经功能缺损(2 例)、手术出血(1 例)和线圈移位(1 例),但没有后遗症或死亡。宽颈状态和 ADPKD 是再次栓塞的风险因素,而成功闭塞和支架植入似乎降低了再次栓塞术后复发的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extended monitoring of re-coiled cerebral aneurysms after initial postcoiling recanalization: Safety and durability of repeat coil embolization

Purpose

In the endovascular era, postcoiling recanalization of cerebral aneurysms is occurring with greater frequency. Repeat coiling is usually done to prevent rebleeding, although long-term outcomes of re-embolization have yet to be adequately investigated. The present study was undertaken to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes of re-embolization in recanalized aneurysms, focusing on procedural safety, efficacy, and durability.

Method

In this retrospective review, we examined 308 patients with 310 recurrent aneurysms. All lesions were re-coiled, once major recanalization (after initial coil embolization) was established. Medical records and radiologic data amassed during extended follow-up were then subject to review. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was undertaken to identify risk factors for subsequent recurrence.

Result

During a lengthy follow-up (mean, 40.2 ± 33.0 months), major recanalization developed again in 87 aneurysms (28.1%). Multivariable Cox regression analysis linked re-recanalization to initial saccular neck width (p=.003) and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD; p<.001). Stent implantation (p=.038) and successful occlusion at second coiling (p=.012) were protective against later recanalization in this setting. The more recent the second embolization was performed, the lower the risk of further recurrence (p=.023). Procedure-related complications included asymptomatic thromboembolism (n = 9), transient ischemic neurologic deficits (n = 2), procedural bleeding (n = 1), and coil migration (n = 1), but there were no residual effects or deaths.

Conclusion

Repeat coil embolization is a safe therapeutic option for recanalized cerebral aneurysms. Wide-necked status and ADPKD emerged as risks for subsequent recanalization, whereas successful occlusion and stent implantation seemed to reduce the likelihood of recurrence after re-embolization procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroradiology
Journal of Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroradiology is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing worldwide clinical and basic research in the field of diagnostic and Interventional neuroradiology, translational and molecular neuroimaging, and artificial intelligence in neuroradiology. The Journal of Neuroradiology considers for publication articles, reviews, technical notes and letters to the editors (correspondence section), provided that the methodology and scientific content are of high quality, and that the results will have substantial clinical impact and/or physiological importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信