当病人做出意外的医疗选择时。

Grace Cullen
{"title":"当病人做出意外的医疗选择时。","authors":"Grace Cullen","doi":"10.12788/fp.0350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nIn the United States, about 500,000 patients are receiving maintenance dialysis for end-stage renal disease. The decision to discontinue dialysis and receive hospice care tends to be more difficult than to withhold or forego dialysis.\n\n\nObservations\nSupporting patient autonomy is an important health care priority that is recognized by most clinicians. However, some health care professionals are conflicted when patient autonomy varies from their treatment recommendations. This paper describes the case of a patient on kidney dialysis who chose to discontinue a potentially life-prolonging treatment.\n\n\nConclusions\nRespecting a patient's autonomy to make informed decisions about their end-of-life care is a fundamental ethical and legal principle. Medical opinion should not and cannot overrule the wishes of a competent patient who refuses treatment.","PeriodicalId":73021,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"40 1","pages":"11-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201942/pdf/fp-40-01-11.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Patients Make Unexpected Medical Choices.\",\"authors\":\"Grace Cullen\",\"doi\":\"10.12788/fp.0350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nIn the United States, about 500,000 patients are receiving maintenance dialysis for end-stage renal disease. The decision to discontinue dialysis and receive hospice care tends to be more difficult than to withhold or forego dialysis.\\n\\n\\nObservations\\nSupporting patient autonomy is an important health care priority that is recognized by most clinicians. However, some health care professionals are conflicted when patient autonomy varies from their treatment recommendations. This paper describes the case of a patient on kidney dialysis who chose to discontinue a potentially life-prolonging treatment.\\n\\n\\nConclusions\\nRespecting a patient's autonomy to make informed decisions about their end-of-life care is a fundamental ethical and legal principle. Medical opinion should not and cannot overrule the wishes of a competent patient who refuses treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"11-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201942/pdf/fp-40-01-11.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,约有50万名终末期肾病患者接受维持性透析治疗。决定停止透析并接受临终关怀往往比拒绝或放弃透析更困难。观察:支持病人自主是一个重要的卫生保健优先事项,是公认的大多数临床医生。然而,当患者的自主权与他们的治疗建议不同时,一些卫生保健专业人员感到矛盾。本文描述的情况下,病人肾透析谁选择停止一个潜在的延长生命的治疗。结论:尊重病人在知情的情况下做出临终关怀决定的自主权是一项基本的伦理和法律原则。医学意见不应该也不能推翻拒绝治疗的有能力的病人的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Patients Make Unexpected Medical Choices.
Background In the United States, about 500,000 patients are receiving maintenance dialysis for end-stage renal disease. The decision to discontinue dialysis and receive hospice care tends to be more difficult than to withhold or forego dialysis. Observations Supporting patient autonomy is an important health care priority that is recognized by most clinicians. However, some health care professionals are conflicted when patient autonomy varies from their treatment recommendations. This paper describes the case of a patient on kidney dialysis who chose to discontinue a potentially life-prolonging treatment. Conclusions Respecting a patient's autonomy to make informed decisions about their end-of-life care is a fundamental ethical and legal principle. Medical opinion should not and cannot overrule the wishes of a competent patient who refuses treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信