一项比较超声引导下锁骨下阻滞在上肢手术中单次和三次注射技术疗效的随机对照试验。

IF 1.5 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Raksha Vedavyas, Ravi Saravanan, Gunaseelan Mirunalini, Balasubramaniam Gayathri
{"title":"一项比较超声引导下锁骨下阻滞在上肢手术中单次和三次注射技术疗效的随机对照试验。","authors":"Raksha Vedavyas,&nbsp;Ravi Saravanan,&nbsp;Gunaseelan Mirunalini,&nbsp;Balasubramaniam Gayathri","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S409211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block by triple-point injection method was aimed at blocking the three individual cords in the infraclavicular region. Recently, a single-point injection method which does not require visualization of cords to produce nerve block has been introduced. This study compared the block onset time, performance time, patient's satisfaction, and complications between the ultrasound guided triple-point injection and single-point injection methods.</p><p><strong>Patients and method: </strong>This randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Sixty patients were divided into two groups - Group S: 30 patients received single-point injection method of infraclavicular block. Group T: 30 patients received triple-point injection method of infraclavicular block. Drugs used were 0.5% ropivacaine with 8 mg dexamethasone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensory onset time was significantly longer in Group S (11.13 ±1.83 min) than Group T (6.20 ±1.19min). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding mean motor onset time. The composite sensorimotor onset time was similar between the groups. The mean time to perform the block was significantly lesser in Group S (1.35 ±0.38 min) when compared to group T (3.44 ±0.61min). The patient satisfaction score, conversion to general anesthesia and complications were not significant among the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We concluded that single-point injection method had a shorter performance time and similar total onset time with less procedural complications compared with triple point injection method.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/72/lra-16-51.PMC10202210.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Single versus Triple Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block in Upper Limb Surgeries.\",\"authors\":\"Raksha Vedavyas,&nbsp;Ravi Saravanan,&nbsp;Gunaseelan Mirunalini,&nbsp;Balasubramaniam Gayathri\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/LRA.S409211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block by triple-point injection method was aimed at blocking the three individual cords in the infraclavicular region. Recently, a single-point injection method which does not require visualization of cords to produce nerve block has been introduced. This study compared the block onset time, performance time, patient's satisfaction, and complications between the ultrasound guided triple-point injection and single-point injection methods.</p><p><strong>Patients and method: </strong>This randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Sixty patients were divided into two groups - Group S: 30 patients received single-point injection method of infraclavicular block. Group T: 30 patients received triple-point injection method of infraclavicular block. Drugs used were 0.5% ropivacaine with 8 mg dexamethasone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensory onset time was significantly longer in Group S (11.13 ±1.83 min) than Group T (6.20 ±1.19min). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding mean motor onset time. The composite sensorimotor onset time was similar between the groups. The mean time to perform the block was significantly lesser in Group S (1.35 ±0.38 min) when compared to group T (3.44 ±0.61min). The patient satisfaction score, conversion to general anesthesia and complications were not significant among the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We concluded that single-point injection method had a shorter performance time and similar total onset time with less procedural complications compared with triple point injection method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Local and Regional Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"51-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/72/lra-16-51.PMC10202210.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Local and Regional Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S409211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S409211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

超声引导下锁骨下臂丛阻滞采用三点注射的方法,目的是阻断锁骨下区域的三条单独的束。最近,一种不需要看到脊髓就能产生神经阻滞的单点注射方法被引入。本研究比较超声引导下三点注射与单点注射两种方法在阻滞起效时间、手术时间、患者满意度及并发症等方面的差异。患者和方法:本随机对照试验在一家三级保健医院进行。60例患者分为两组:S组:30例患者采用锁骨下阻滞单点注射法。T组:30例患者采用锁骨下阻滞三点法注射。所用药物为0.5%罗哌卡因加8mg地塞米松。结果:S组感觉起效时间(11.13±1.83 min)明显长于T组(6.20±1.19min)。两组平均运动发作时间无统计学差异。两组间复合感觉运动发作时间相似。S组的平均阻滞时间(1.35±0.38 min)明显少于T组(3.44±0.61min)。两组患者满意度评分、转全麻及并发症均无显著差异。结论:与三点注射相比,单点注射的起效时间更短,总起效时间相似,手术并发症更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Single versus Triple Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block in Upper Limb Surgeries.

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Single versus Triple Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block in Upper Limb Surgeries.

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Single versus Triple Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block in Upper Limb Surgeries.

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Single versus Triple Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block in Upper Limb Surgeries.

Introduction: The ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block by triple-point injection method was aimed at blocking the three individual cords in the infraclavicular region. Recently, a single-point injection method which does not require visualization of cords to produce nerve block has been introduced. This study compared the block onset time, performance time, patient's satisfaction, and complications between the ultrasound guided triple-point injection and single-point injection methods.

Patients and method: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Sixty patients were divided into two groups - Group S: 30 patients received single-point injection method of infraclavicular block. Group T: 30 patients received triple-point injection method of infraclavicular block. Drugs used were 0.5% ropivacaine with 8 mg dexamethasone.

Results: The sensory onset time was significantly longer in Group S (11.13 ±1.83 min) than Group T (6.20 ±1.19min). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding mean motor onset time. The composite sensorimotor onset time was similar between the groups. The mean time to perform the block was significantly lesser in Group S (1.35 ±0.38 min) when compared to group T (3.44 ±0.61min). The patient satisfaction score, conversion to general anesthesia and complications were not significant among the two groups.

Conclusion: We concluded that single-point injection method had a shorter performance time and similar total onset time with less procedural complications compared with triple point injection method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信