增强聚焦深度的人工晶体:通过波前整形与衍射光学的聚焦评估。

Biomedicine Hub Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000529234
Ruediger Schmid, Andreas F Borkenstein
{"title":"增强聚焦深度的人工晶体:通过波前整形与衍射光学的聚焦评估。","authors":"Ruediger Schmid,&nbsp;Andreas F Borkenstein","doi":"10.1159/000529234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A new class of nondiffractive, wavefront-shaping Enhanced-Depth-of-Focus (EDoF) IOLs has been introduced very recently to cope with photic phenomena known from diffractive EDoF IOLs. We investigated the through focus modulation transfer function (MTF) of two wavefront-shaping EDoF IOLs compared to an established diffractive EDoF IOL on the optical bench. Such comparison on the optical bench had not been performed before and is of high clinical importance for the cataract surgeon.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Tecnis Symfony (diffractive) and the wavefront-shaping Acrysof IQ Vivity and LuxSmart Crystal IOLs (22 D each) were assessed by the OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 imaging test bench with an ISO-2 cornea and a wavelength of 546 nm. Apertures of 3 mm and 4.5 mm were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all three IOLs, two peaks showed up in the through focus MTF curves representing the primary and secondary focus. For Symfony, these peaks were most distinct. Power difference between far and intermediate focus was 1.25 D (Symfony), 1.75 D (Vivity), and 1.5 D (LuxSmart) with an aperture of 3 mm. With an aperture of 4.5 mm, only for LuxSmart, power difference diminished slightly to about 1 D, and only the MTF in the intermediate focus decreased for all lenses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For all three IOLs, we could confirm a considerable depth of focus that was most extended for Vivity. Both new wavefront-shaping IOLs had lower values of peak MTF but a markedly more continuous through focus behavior compared to the diffractive EDoF IOL.</p>","PeriodicalId":9075,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine Hub","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/aa/ea/bmh-2023-0008-0001-529234.PMC10015109.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics.\",\"authors\":\"Ruediger Schmid,&nbsp;Andreas F Borkenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000529234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A new class of nondiffractive, wavefront-shaping Enhanced-Depth-of-Focus (EDoF) IOLs has been introduced very recently to cope with photic phenomena known from diffractive EDoF IOLs. We investigated the through focus modulation transfer function (MTF) of two wavefront-shaping EDoF IOLs compared to an established diffractive EDoF IOL on the optical bench. Such comparison on the optical bench had not been performed before and is of high clinical importance for the cataract surgeon.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Tecnis Symfony (diffractive) and the wavefront-shaping Acrysof IQ Vivity and LuxSmart Crystal IOLs (22 D each) were assessed by the OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 imaging test bench with an ISO-2 cornea and a wavelength of 546 nm. Apertures of 3 mm and 4.5 mm were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all three IOLs, two peaks showed up in the through focus MTF curves representing the primary and secondary focus. For Symfony, these peaks were most distinct. Power difference between far and intermediate focus was 1.25 D (Symfony), 1.75 D (Vivity), and 1.5 D (LuxSmart) with an aperture of 3 mm. With an aperture of 4.5 mm, only for LuxSmart, power difference diminished slightly to about 1 D, and only the MTF in the intermediate focus decreased for all lenses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For all three IOLs, we could confirm a considerable depth of focus that was most extended for Vivity. Both new wavefront-shaping IOLs had lower values of peak MTF but a markedly more continuous through focus behavior compared to the diffractive EDoF IOL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedicine Hub\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/aa/ea/bmh-2023-0008-0001-529234.PMC10015109.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedicine Hub\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine Hub","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:一种新型的无衍射,波前整形增强聚焦深度(EDoF) iol最近已经推出,以应对已知的衍射EDoF iol的光学现象。本文研究了两种波前整形型EDoF IOL与衍射型EDoF IOL的通焦调制传递函数(MTF)。在光学台上进行这种比较以前从未进行过,对白内障外科医生具有很高的临床意义。材料和方法:采用optisphere IOL PRO 2成像试验台,采用ISO-2标准角膜,波长为546 nm,对Tecnis Symfony(衍射)和Acrysof IQ Vivity和LuxSmart晶体IOL(每个22d)进行成像测试。孔径分别为3mm和4.5 mm。结果:三种人工晶状体的过焦MTF曲线均出现两个峰,分别代表主焦和次焦。对于Symfony来说,这些峰值最为明显。远焦和中焦的焦距差分别为1.25 D (Symfony)、1.75 D (Vivity)和1.5 D (LuxSmart),孔径为3 mm。当光圈为4.5 mm时,只有LuxSmart的焦距差略微减小到约1 D,所有镜头只有中间焦距的MTF减小。结论:对于这三种人工晶状体,我们可以确定相当大的聚焦深度,最大限度地延长了Vivity。两种新型波前成形IOL的峰值MTF值较低,但与衍射型EDoF IOL相比,其通过焦点的行为明显更连续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics.

Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics.

Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics.

Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: Through Focus Evaluation of Wavefront-Shaping versus Diffractive Optics.

Introduction: A new class of nondiffractive, wavefront-shaping Enhanced-Depth-of-Focus (EDoF) IOLs has been introduced very recently to cope with photic phenomena known from diffractive EDoF IOLs. We investigated the through focus modulation transfer function (MTF) of two wavefront-shaping EDoF IOLs compared to an established diffractive EDoF IOL on the optical bench. Such comparison on the optical bench had not been performed before and is of high clinical importance for the cataract surgeon.

Material and methods: Tecnis Symfony (diffractive) and the wavefront-shaping Acrysof IQ Vivity and LuxSmart Crystal IOLs (22 D each) were assessed by the OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 imaging test bench with an ISO-2 cornea and a wavelength of 546 nm. Apertures of 3 mm and 4.5 mm were applied.

Results: For all three IOLs, two peaks showed up in the through focus MTF curves representing the primary and secondary focus. For Symfony, these peaks were most distinct. Power difference between far and intermediate focus was 1.25 D (Symfony), 1.75 D (Vivity), and 1.5 D (LuxSmart) with an aperture of 3 mm. With an aperture of 4.5 mm, only for LuxSmart, power difference diminished slightly to about 1 D, and only the MTF in the intermediate focus decreased for all lenses.

Conclusion: For all three IOLs, we could confirm a considerable depth of focus that was most extended for Vivity. Both new wavefront-shaping IOLs had lower values of peak MTF but a markedly more continuous through focus behavior compared to the diffractive EDoF IOL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信