精神病患者获得有效治疗的权利:Osheroff诉Chestnut Lodge案的启示。

Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-25 DOI:10.1176/appi.focus.22020018
Gerald L Klerman
{"title":"精神病患者获得有效治疗的权利:Osheroff诉Chestnut Lodge案的启示。","authors":"Gerald L Klerman","doi":"10.1176/appi.focus.22020018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although <i>Osheroff v. Chestnut Lodge</i> never reached final court adjudication, the case generated widespread discussion in psychiatric, legal, and lay circles. The author served as a consultant to Dr. Osheroff and testified that Chestnut Lodge failed to follow through with appropriate biological treatment for its own diagnosis of depression, focusing instead on Dr. Osheroff's presumed personality disorder diagnosis and treating him with intensive long-term individual psychotherapy. The author suggests that this case involves the proposed right of the patient to effective treatment and that treatments whose efficacy has been demonstrated have priority over treatments whose efficacy has not been established. Reprinted from <i>Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147:409-418</i>, with permission from American Psychiatric Association Publishing. Publishing. Copyright © 1990.</p>","PeriodicalId":73036,"journal":{"name":"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Psychiatric Patient's Right to Effective Treatment: Implications of <i>Osheroff v. Chestnut Lodge</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Gerald L Klerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.focus.22020018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although <i>Osheroff v. Chestnut Lodge</i> never reached final court adjudication, the case generated widespread discussion in psychiatric, legal, and lay circles. The author served as a consultant to Dr. Osheroff and testified that Chestnut Lodge failed to follow through with appropriate biological treatment for its own diagnosis of depression, focusing instead on Dr. Osheroff's presumed personality disorder diagnosis and treating him with intensive long-term individual psychotherapy. The author suggests that this case involves the proposed right of the patient to effective treatment and that treatments whose efficacy has been demonstrated have priority over treatments whose efficacy has not been established. Reprinted from <i>Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147:409-418</i>, with permission from American Psychiatric Association Publishing. Publishing. Copyright © 1990.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10187399/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.22020018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.22020018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管Osheroff诉Chestnut Lodge一案从未得到法院的最终裁决,但该案在精神、法律和非专业圈子里引起了广泛的讨论。提交人曾担任Osheroff博士的顾问,并证实Chestnut Lodge未能对其自己的抑郁症诊断进行适当的生物治疗,而是专注于Osheroff医生推测的人格障碍诊断,并对其进行了强化的长期个人心理治疗。作者认为,本案涉及拟议的患者获得有效治疗的权利,已证明疗效的治疗优先于尚未确定疗效的治疗。转载自《美国精神病学杂志》1990;147:409-418,经美国精神病学协会出版许可。出版。版权所有©1990。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Psychiatric Patient's Right to Effective Treatment: Implications of Osheroff v. Chestnut Lodge.

Although Osheroff v. Chestnut Lodge never reached final court adjudication, the case generated widespread discussion in psychiatric, legal, and lay circles. The author served as a consultant to Dr. Osheroff and testified that Chestnut Lodge failed to follow through with appropriate biological treatment for its own diagnosis of depression, focusing instead on Dr. Osheroff's presumed personality disorder diagnosis and treating him with intensive long-term individual psychotherapy. The author suggests that this case involves the proposed right of the patient to effective treatment and that treatments whose efficacy has been demonstrated have priority over treatments whose efficacy has not been established. Reprinted from Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147:409-418, with permission from American Psychiatric Association Publishing. Publishing. Copyright © 1990.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信