Strabocheck®作为接受手术的儿童共同水平斜视的客观测量方法的评估。

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Strabismus Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-18 DOI:10.1080/09273972.2023.2204886
Casem Azri, Pierre Tomietto, Emmanuel Marciano, Emmanuel Bui-Quoc
{"title":"Strabocheck®作为接受手术的儿童共同水平斜视的客观测量方法的评估。","authors":"Casem Azri,&nbsp;Pierre Tomietto,&nbsp;Emmanuel Marciano,&nbsp;Emmanuel Bui-Quoc","doi":"10.1080/09273972.2023.2204886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The gold standard of angle measurement is the prism alternating cover test (PCT). This method requires cooperation from the child, experience, and presents a significant inter-observer variability. <i>Strabocheck®</i>(SK) is a new simple tool for objective and semi-automated angle measurement. Our purpose is to evaluate <i>Strabocheck®</i> in children undergoing surgery for comitant horizontal strabismus. The study population was divided into 3 groups: infantile esotropia, partially accommodative esotropia and intermittent exotropia. The primary endpoint was the agreement between <i>Strabocheck®</i>and the PCT. A total of 44 children were included prospectively. The correlation between the angle measured by the PCT and the angle measured by SK was strong (<i>R</i> = 0.87). The mean absolute difference in the angle measured by the two methods was Δ = 11.9+/- 9.8 diopters. The Bland-Altman plot shows a 95% interval limit between -30.0 [-34.4; -25.6] and 31.0 [26.7; 35.4] diopters. SK is an interesting tool to evaluate the angle of strabismus in children. However, the residual discordance between PCT and SK leads us to question the real value of the angle, which can only be approximated. A better clinical experience of this new tool in relation to the clinical condition and the PCT will allow to have a more accurate idea on the true angle and will probably help the surgeon to adapt this procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":51700,"journal":{"name":"Strabismus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of <i>Strabocheck®</i> as an objective measurement method of comitant horizontal strabismus in children undergoing surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Casem Azri,&nbsp;Pierre Tomietto,&nbsp;Emmanuel Marciano,&nbsp;Emmanuel Bui-Quoc\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09273972.2023.2204886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The gold standard of angle measurement is the prism alternating cover test (PCT). This method requires cooperation from the child, experience, and presents a significant inter-observer variability. <i>Strabocheck®</i>(SK) is a new simple tool for objective and semi-automated angle measurement. Our purpose is to evaluate <i>Strabocheck®</i> in children undergoing surgery for comitant horizontal strabismus. The study population was divided into 3 groups: infantile esotropia, partially accommodative esotropia and intermittent exotropia. The primary endpoint was the agreement between <i>Strabocheck®</i>and the PCT. A total of 44 children were included prospectively. The correlation between the angle measured by the PCT and the angle measured by SK was strong (<i>R</i> = 0.87). The mean absolute difference in the angle measured by the two methods was Δ = 11.9+/- 9.8 diopters. The Bland-Altman plot shows a 95% interval limit between -30.0 [-34.4; -25.6] and 31.0 [26.7; 35.4] diopters. SK is an interesting tool to evaluate the angle of strabismus in children. However, the residual discordance between PCT and SK leads us to question the real value of the angle, which can only be approximated. A better clinical experience of this new tool in relation to the clinical condition and the PCT will allow to have a more accurate idea on the true angle and will probably help the surgeon to adapt this procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strabismus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strabismus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2023.2204886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2023.2204886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

角度测量的黄金标准是棱镜交替覆盖测试(PCT)。这种方法需要孩子的合作和经验,并且呈现出显著的观察者间可变性。Strabocheck®(SK)是一种用于物镜和半自动角度测量的新型简单工具。我们的目的是评估Strabocheck®在接受共同水平斜视手术的儿童中的作用。研究人群分为3组:婴儿内斜视、部分调节性内斜视和间歇性外斜视。主要终点是Strabocheck®和PCT之间的一致性。前瞻性纳入了总共44名儿童。PCT测量的角度和SK测量的角度之间的相关性很强(R = 0.87)。通过两种方法测量的角度的平均绝对差为Δ = 11.9+/-9.8屈光度。Bland-Altman图显示95%的间隔极限在-30.0[-34.4;-25.6]和31.0[26.7;35.4]屈光度之间。SK是一种评估儿童斜视角度的有趣工具。然而,PCT和SK之间的残余不一致导致我们质疑角度的真实值,而角度只能近似。与临床条件和PCT相关的这种新工具的更好的临床经验将允许对真实角度有更准确的想法,并可能有助于外科医生调整这种手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Strabocheck® as an objective measurement method of comitant horizontal strabismus in children undergoing surgery.

The gold standard of angle measurement is the prism alternating cover test (PCT). This method requires cooperation from the child, experience, and presents a significant inter-observer variability. Strabocheck®(SK) is a new simple tool for objective and semi-automated angle measurement. Our purpose is to evaluate Strabocheck® in children undergoing surgery for comitant horizontal strabismus. The study population was divided into 3 groups: infantile esotropia, partially accommodative esotropia and intermittent exotropia. The primary endpoint was the agreement between Strabocheck®and the PCT. A total of 44 children were included prospectively. The correlation between the angle measured by the PCT and the angle measured by SK was strong (R = 0.87). The mean absolute difference in the angle measured by the two methods was Δ = 11.9+/- 9.8 diopters. The Bland-Altman plot shows a 95% interval limit between -30.0 [-34.4; -25.6] and 31.0 [26.7; 35.4] diopters. SK is an interesting tool to evaluate the angle of strabismus in children. However, the residual discordance between PCT and SK leads us to question the real value of the angle, which can only be approximated. A better clinical experience of this new tool in relation to the clinical condition and the PCT will allow to have a more accurate idea on the true angle and will probably help the surgeon to adapt this procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strabismus
Strabismus OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信