老年股骨颈骨折内固定再手术率116例回顾性随访研究及危险因素探讨

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Viktor Labmayr, Andrea Borenich, Thomas Pusch, Patrick Reinbacher, Georg Hauer, Patrick Sadoghi, Andreas Leithner, Andrea Berghold, Paul Puchwein
{"title":"老年股骨颈骨折内固定再手术率116例回顾性随访研究及危险因素探讨","authors":"Viktor Labmayr,&nbsp;Andrea Borenich,&nbsp;Thomas Pusch,&nbsp;Patrick Reinbacher,&nbsp;Georg Hauer,&nbsp;Patrick Sadoghi,&nbsp;Andreas Leithner,&nbsp;Andrea Berghold,&nbsp;Paul Puchwein","doi":"10.1177/21514593231164105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Internal fixation of femoral neck fractures is a widely used procedure that is comparatively less invasive and faster than hip replacement. While head preserving internal fixation of these fractures are still preferred where feasible, a faster recovery and lower reoperation rates make arthroplasty increasingly more appealing, in spite of being a more invasive option. Our aim was to determine the reoperation rate after internal fixation at our institution and to explore relevant risk factors in a geriatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This monocentric follow-up study was conducted analyzing 116 patients aged 65 and older with femoral neck fractures who were surgically treated with either cancellous screws or dynamic hip screws between 2010 and 2017. We retrospectively collected longitudinal data from our patient database, supplemented by a telephone survey, with a follow-up period of at least 18 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty reoperations, due to either a failure of fixation, avascular necrosis, or posttraumatic osteoarthritis, were identified in our cohort, which constituted a reoperation rate of 17.2% (20/116). Fracture displacement was significantly associated with the reoperation risk (HR 8, CI 3-20; <i>P</i> < .001). The reoperation rate was 52.2% in displaced fractures vs 8.9% in undisplaced fractures. No link was found between the reoperation rate and gender, age, BMI, ASA score, type of implant, quality of internal fixation, type of living accommodation, and pre-fracture mobility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Internal fixation has been found to be an effective option in elderly patients with undisplaced fractures regardless of their specific age, cognitive ability or physical condition. In displaced fractures the reoperation rate was found to be high, therefore a primary hip replacement should be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"14 ","pages":"21514593231164105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f5/af/10.1177_21514593231164105.PMC10009026.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reoperation Rate of Internal Fixation for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly - A Retrospective Follow-Up Study in 116 Patients With an Exploration of Risk Factors.\",\"authors\":\"Viktor Labmayr,&nbsp;Andrea Borenich,&nbsp;Thomas Pusch,&nbsp;Patrick Reinbacher,&nbsp;Georg Hauer,&nbsp;Patrick Sadoghi,&nbsp;Andreas Leithner,&nbsp;Andrea Berghold,&nbsp;Paul Puchwein\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21514593231164105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Internal fixation of femoral neck fractures is a widely used procedure that is comparatively less invasive and faster than hip replacement. While head preserving internal fixation of these fractures are still preferred where feasible, a faster recovery and lower reoperation rates make arthroplasty increasingly more appealing, in spite of being a more invasive option. Our aim was to determine the reoperation rate after internal fixation at our institution and to explore relevant risk factors in a geriatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This monocentric follow-up study was conducted analyzing 116 patients aged 65 and older with femoral neck fractures who were surgically treated with either cancellous screws or dynamic hip screws between 2010 and 2017. We retrospectively collected longitudinal data from our patient database, supplemented by a telephone survey, with a follow-up period of at least 18 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty reoperations, due to either a failure of fixation, avascular necrosis, or posttraumatic osteoarthritis, were identified in our cohort, which constituted a reoperation rate of 17.2% (20/116). Fracture displacement was significantly associated with the reoperation risk (HR 8, CI 3-20; <i>P</i> < .001). The reoperation rate was 52.2% in displaced fractures vs 8.9% in undisplaced fractures. No link was found between the reoperation rate and gender, age, BMI, ASA score, type of implant, quality of internal fixation, type of living accommodation, and pre-fracture mobility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Internal fixation has been found to be an effective option in elderly patients with undisplaced fractures regardless of their specific age, cognitive ability or physical condition. In displaced fractures the reoperation rate was found to be high, therefore a primary hip replacement should be recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"21514593231164105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f5/af/10.1177_21514593231164105.PMC10009026.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593231164105\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593231164105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:股骨颈骨折的内固定是一种广泛应用的手术,相对于髋关节置换术,其侵入性小,速度快。虽然在可行的情况下,保留头部内固定仍然是首选,但更快的恢复和更低的再手术率使得关节置换术越来越受欢迎,尽管它是一种更具侵入性的选择。我们的目的是确定我们机构内固定后的再手术率,并探讨老年人群的相关危险因素。方法:本研究对2010年至2017年间116例65岁及以上股骨颈骨折患者进行单中心随访分析,这些患者均采用松质螺钉或动力髋关节螺钉进行手术治疗。我们回顾性地从患者数据库中收集纵向数据,辅以电话调查,随访期至少为18个月。结果:在我们的队列中发现了20例因固定失败、缺血性坏死或创伤后骨关节炎而再次手术的患者,其再手术率为17.2%(20/116)。骨折移位与再手术风险显著相关(HR 8, CI 3-20;P < 0.001)。移位骨折的再手术率为52.2%,未移位骨折的再手术率为8.9%。再手术率与性别、年龄、BMI、ASA评分、植入物类型、内固定质量、生活场所类型和骨折前活动能力之间无关联。结论:无论其具体年龄、认知能力或身体状况如何,内固定是治疗老年非移位性骨折的有效选择。在移位性骨折中,再手术率很高,因此应建议进行首次髋关节置换术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reoperation Rate of Internal Fixation for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly - A Retrospective Follow-Up Study in 116 Patients With an Exploration of Risk Factors.

Reoperation Rate of Internal Fixation for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly - A Retrospective Follow-Up Study in 116 Patients With an Exploration of Risk Factors.

Reoperation Rate of Internal Fixation for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly - A Retrospective Follow-Up Study in 116 Patients With an Exploration of Risk Factors.

Reoperation Rate of Internal Fixation for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly - A Retrospective Follow-Up Study in 116 Patients With an Exploration of Risk Factors.

Aim: Internal fixation of femoral neck fractures is a widely used procedure that is comparatively less invasive and faster than hip replacement. While head preserving internal fixation of these fractures are still preferred where feasible, a faster recovery and lower reoperation rates make arthroplasty increasingly more appealing, in spite of being a more invasive option. Our aim was to determine the reoperation rate after internal fixation at our institution and to explore relevant risk factors in a geriatric population.

Methods: This monocentric follow-up study was conducted analyzing 116 patients aged 65 and older with femoral neck fractures who were surgically treated with either cancellous screws or dynamic hip screws between 2010 and 2017. We retrospectively collected longitudinal data from our patient database, supplemented by a telephone survey, with a follow-up period of at least 18 months.

Results: Twenty reoperations, due to either a failure of fixation, avascular necrosis, or posttraumatic osteoarthritis, were identified in our cohort, which constituted a reoperation rate of 17.2% (20/116). Fracture displacement was significantly associated with the reoperation risk (HR 8, CI 3-20; P < .001). The reoperation rate was 52.2% in displaced fractures vs 8.9% in undisplaced fractures. No link was found between the reoperation rate and gender, age, BMI, ASA score, type of implant, quality of internal fixation, type of living accommodation, and pre-fracture mobility.

Conclusion: Internal fixation has been found to be an effective option in elderly patients with undisplaced fractures regardless of their specific age, cognitive ability or physical condition. In displaced fractures the reoperation rate was found to be high, therefore a primary hip replacement should be recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信