检验COVID-19检测试剂盒TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i用于鼻咽拭子的实用性。

IF 1.9 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Satoru Ishii, Moto Kimura, Tohru Miyoshi-Akiyama, Ataru Moriya, Masami Kurokawa, Erina Isaka, Junko Terada-Hirashima, Jin Takasaki, Shinyu Izumi, Masayuki Hojo, Haruhito Sugiyama
{"title":"检验COVID-19检测试剂盒TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i用于鼻咽拭子的实用性。","authors":"Satoru Ishii,&nbsp;Moto Kimura,&nbsp;Tohru Miyoshi-Akiyama,&nbsp;Ataru Moriya,&nbsp;Masami Kurokawa,&nbsp;Erina Isaka,&nbsp;Junko Terada-Hirashima,&nbsp;Jin Takasaki,&nbsp;Shinyu Izumi,&nbsp;Masayuki Hojo,&nbsp;Haruhito Sugiyama","doi":"10.5582/ddt.2022.01106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) offers high sensitivity, but has some drawbacks, such as the time required for the RNA extraction. Transcription reverse-transcription concerted reaction (TRC) Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i is easy to use and can be performed in about 40 minutes. TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i and real-time one-step RT-PCR using the TaqMan probe tests of cryopreserved nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were compared. The primary objective was to examine the positive and negative concordance rates. A total of 69 samples cryopreserved at -80° C were examined. Of the 37 frozen samples that were expected to be RT-PCR positive, 35 were positive by the RT-PCR method. TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i detected 33 positive cases and 2 negative cases. One frozen sample that was expected to be RT-PCR positive was negative on both TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i and RT-PCR. In addition, one frozen sample that was expected to be RT-PCR positive was positive by the RT-PCR method and negative by TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i. Of the 32 frozen samples that were expected to be RT-PCR negative, both the RT-PCR method and TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i yielded negative results for all 32 samples. Compared with RT-PCR, TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i had a positive concordance rate of 94.3% and a negative concordance rate of 97.1%. TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i can be utilized in a wide range of medical sites such as clinics and community hospitals due to its ease of operability, and is expected to be useful in infection control.</p>","PeriodicalId":47494,"journal":{"name":"Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics","volume":"17 2","pages":"134-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examination of the utility of the COVID-19 detection kit, TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i for nasopharyngeal swabs.\",\"authors\":\"Satoru Ishii,&nbsp;Moto Kimura,&nbsp;Tohru Miyoshi-Akiyama,&nbsp;Ataru Moriya,&nbsp;Masami Kurokawa,&nbsp;Erina Isaka,&nbsp;Junko Terada-Hirashima,&nbsp;Jin Takasaki,&nbsp;Shinyu Izumi,&nbsp;Masayuki Hojo,&nbsp;Haruhito Sugiyama\",\"doi\":\"10.5582/ddt.2022.01106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) offers high sensitivity, but has some drawbacks, such as the time required for the RNA extraction. Transcription reverse-transcription concerted reaction (TRC) Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i is easy to use and can be performed in about 40 minutes. TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i and real-time one-step RT-PCR using the TaqMan probe tests of cryopreserved nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were compared. The primary objective was to examine the positive and negative concordance rates. A total of 69 samples cryopreserved at -80° C were examined. Of the 37 frozen samples that were expected to be RT-PCR positive, 35 were positive by the RT-PCR method. TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i detected 33 positive cases and 2 negative cases. One frozen sample that was expected to be RT-PCR positive was negative on both TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i and RT-PCR. In addition, one frozen sample that was expected to be RT-PCR positive was positive by the RT-PCR method and negative by TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i. Of the 32 frozen samples that were expected to be RT-PCR negative, both the RT-PCR method and TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i yielded negative results for all 32 samples. Compared with RT-PCR, TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i had a positive concordance rate of 94.3% and a negative concordance rate of 97.1%. TRC Ready<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 i can be utilized in a wide range of medical sites such as clinics and community hospitals due to its ease of operability, and is expected to be useful in infection control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"134-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5582/ddt.2022.01106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5582/ddt.2022.01106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)具有高灵敏度,但也存在一些缺点,如RNA提取所需的时间。转录逆转录协同反应(TRC) Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i易于使用,可在约40分钟内完成。比较了诊断为COVID-19的患者冷冻保存的鼻咽拭子样本的TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i和使用TaqMan探针检测的实时一步RT-PCR。主要目的是检查阳性和阴性的一致性率。在-80°C低温保存的样品共69个。在预期为RT-PCR阳性的37个冷冻样本中,35个通过RT-PCR方法呈阳性。TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i检测到33例阳性病例和2例阴性病例。一份预计RT-PCR阳性的冷冻样本在TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i和RT-PCR上均呈阴性。此外,一份预计为RT-PCR阳性的冷冻样本经RT-PCR方法检测为阳性,而经TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i检测为阴性。在32份预计为RT-PCR阴性的冷冻样本中,RT-PCR方法和TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i检测均为阴性。与RT-PCR相比,TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i阳性符合率为94.3%,阴性符合率为97.1%。TRC Ready®SARS-CoV-2 i由于易于操作,可广泛用于诊所和社区医院等医疗场所,并有望在感染控制方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examination of the utility of the COVID-19 detection kit, TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i for nasopharyngeal swabs.

The reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) offers high sensitivity, but has some drawbacks, such as the time required for the RNA extraction. Transcription reverse-transcription concerted reaction (TRC) Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i is easy to use and can be performed in about 40 minutes. TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i and real-time one-step RT-PCR using the TaqMan probe tests of cryopreserved nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were compared. The primary objective was to examine the positive and negative concordance rates. A total of 69 samples cryopreserved at -80° C were examined. Of the 37 frozen samples that were expected to be RT-PCR positive, 35 were positive by the RT-PCR method. TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i detected 33 positive cases and 2 negative cases. One frozen sample that was expected to be RT-PCR positive was negative on both TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i and RT-PCR. In addition, one frozen sample that was expected to be RT-PCR positive was positive by the RT-PCR method and negative by TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i. Of the 32 frozen samples that were expected to be RT-PCR negative, both the RT-PCR method and TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i yielded negative results for all 32 samples. Compared with RT-PCR, TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i had a positive concordance rate of 94.3% and a negative concordance rate of 97.1%. TRC Ready® SARS-CoV-2 i can be utilized in a wide range of medical sites such as clinics and community hospitals due to its ease of operability, and is expected to be useful in infection control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics
Drug Discoveries and Therapeutics PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信