{"title":"美学区植骨即刻植入后的面中部软组织萎缩:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xin-Yu Wu, Jun-Yu Shi, Qi Yan","doi":"10.11607/jomi.10014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To systematically analyze the outcomes of immediate implant placement (IIP) with bone grafting in the esthetic area. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched. Prospective studies reporting midfacial soft tissue recession (primary outcome) of single-tooth IIP with bone grafting in the esthetic area were included. Risks of bias were assessed. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were undertaken. <b>Results:</b> A total of 13 studies and 421 patients were included, with a follow-up length of 1 to 10 years in function. The weighted mean (95% CI) of midfacial soft tissue recession was 0.33 (0.21, 0.46) mm and 0.54 (0.16, 0.93) mm after 1 year and 5 years in function. Meta-regression indicated that after 1 year in function, there was 0.33 mm less midfacial soft tissue recession with soft tissue grafting (<i>P</i> = .021), while there was 0.58 mm more soft tissue recession (<i>P</i> = .007) in defect extraction sockets. Implant survival was 97.8%, and all failures were early failures. Peri-implant soft and hard tissue stability, peri-implant health, esthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction were predictable within the follow-up period. <b>Conclusion:</b> Midfacial soft tissue recession showed an ongoing status in IIP with bone grafting in the esthetic area within 5 years in function. For extraction sockets with a thin gingival biotype or deficient buccal bone wall, soft tissue grafting was recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":50298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","volume":"38 2","pages":"239-250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midfacial Soft Tissue Recession Following Immediate Implant Placement with Bone Grafting in the Esthetic Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xin-Yu Wu, Jun-Yu Shi, Qi Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jomi.10014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To systematically analyze the outcomes of immediate implant placement (IIP) with bone grafting in the esthetic area. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched. Prospective studies reporting midfacial soft tissue recession (primary outcome) of single-tooth IIP with bone grafting in the esthetic area were included. Risks of bias were assessed. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were undertaken. <b>Results:</b> A total of 13 studies and 421 patients were included, with a follow-up length of 1 to 10 years in function. The weighted mean (95% CI) of midfacial soft tissue recession was 0.33 (0.21, 0.46) mm and 0.54 (0.16, 0.93) mm after 1 year and 5 years in function. Meta-regression indicated that after 1 year in function, there was 0.33 mm less midfacial soft tissue recession with soft tissue grafting (<i>P</i> = .021), while there was 0.58 mm more soft tissue recession (<i>P</i> = .007) in defect extraction sockets. Implant survival was 97.8%, and all failures were early failures. Peri-implant soft and hard tissue stability, peri-implant health, esthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction were predictable within the follow-up period. <b>Conclusion:</b> Midfacial soft tissue recession showed an ongoing status in IIP with bone grafting in the esthetic area within 5 years in function. For extraction sockets with a thin gingival biotype or deficient buccal bone wall, soft tissue grafting was recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"239-250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:系统分析美学区即刻种植体植入术(IIP)联合植骨的效果。材料与方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane CENTRAL。前瞻性研究报告了在美观区植骨的单牙IIP的面中软组织萎缩(主要结果)。评估偏倚风险。进行了meta分析、敏感性分析和meta回归。结果:共纳入13项研究,421例患者,随访时间为1 ~ 10年。在功能恢复1年和5年后,面中软组织萎缩的加权平均值(95% CI)分别为0.33 (0.21,0.46)mm和0.54 (0.16,0.93)mm。meta回归结果显示,功能恢复1年后,软组织移植术后面中部软组织退缩减少0.33 mm (P = 0.021),缺损拔牙槽术后面中部软组织退缩增加0.58 mm (P = 0.007)。种植体成活率97.8%,均为早期失败。在随访期间,可预测种植体周围软硬组织稳定性、种植体周围健康、美学结果和患者满意度。结论:在美观区植骨的IIP患者,面中软组织萎缩在功能上持续存在5年。对于牙龈生物型较薄或颊骨壁缺损的拔牙槽,建议采用软组织移植。
Midfacial Soft Tissue Recession Following Immediate Implant Placement with Bone Grafting in the Esthetic Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Purpose: To systematically analyze the outcomes of immediate implant placement (IIP) with bone grafting in the esthetic area. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched. Prospective studies reporting midfacial soft tissue recession (primary outcome) of single-tooth IIP with bone grafting in the esthetic area were included. Risks of bias were assessed. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were undertaken. Results: A total of 13 studies and 421 patients were included, with a follow-up length of 1 to 10 years in function. The weighted mean (95% CI) of midfacial soft tissue recession was 0.33 (0.21, 0.46) mm and 0.54 (0.16, 0.93) mm after 1 year and 5 years in function. Meta-regression indicated that after 1 year in function, there was 0.33 mm less midfacial soft tissue recession with soft tissue grafting (P = .021), while there was 0.58 mm more soft tissue recession (P = .007) in defect extraction sockets. Implant survival was 97.8%, and all failures were early failures. Peri-implant soft and hard tissue stability, peri-implant health, esthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction were predictable within the follow-up period. Conclusion: Midfacial soft tissue recession showed an ongoing status in IIP with bone grafting in the esthetic area within 5 years in function. For extraction sockets with a thin gingival biotype or deficient buccal bone wall, soft tissue grafting was recommended.
期刊介绍:
Edited by Steven E. Eckert, DDS, MS ISSN (Print): 0882-2786
ISSN (Online): 1942-4434
This highly regarded, often-cited journal integrates clinical and scientific data to improve methods and results of oral and maxillofacial implant therapy. It presents pioneering research, technology, clinical applications, reviews of the literature, seminal studies, emerging technology, position papers, and consensus studies, as well as the many clinical and therapeutic innovations that ensue as a result of these efforts. The editorial board is composed of recognized opinion leaders in their respective areas of expertise and reflects the international reach of the journal. Under their leadership, JOMI maintains its strong scientific integrity while expanding its influence within the field of implant dentistry. JOMI’s popular regular feature "Thematic Abstract Review" presents a review of abstracts of recently published articles on a specific topical area of interest each issue.