关键利益相关者对标准与总拥有成本的看法:骨科动力器械的采购分析。

Q3 Medicine
Aazad Abbas, Olumide Olotu, Sejla Abdic, Albert Yee, Jeremie Larouche, Cari Whyne, Dante Morra, Jay Toor
{"title":"关键利益相关者对标准与总拥有成本的看法:骨科动力器械的采购分析。","authors":"Aazad Abbas,&nbsp;Olumide Olotu,&nbsp;Sejla Abdic,&nbsp;Albert Yee,&nbsp;Jeremie Larouche,&nbsp;Cari Whyne,&nbsp;Dante Morra,&nbsp;Jay Toor","doi":"10.12927/hcq.2023.27050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compares standard procurement methodology (SPM) with total cost of ownership (TCO) methodology for the procurement of orthopaedic-powered instruments. The authors conducted semi-structured standardized interviews with key hospital procurement stakeholders following consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. Of the 33 hospital procurement stakeholders interviewed, all (100%) reported that SPM would be easier to use than TCO. However, only six (18%) preferred SPM over TCO. Barriers to the adoption of TCO emerged as a theme. Creating TCO frameworks can help to simplify the process for procurement agents and facilitate its adoption in the healthcare sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":39763,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.)","volume":"26 1","pages":"59-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key Stakeholder Perceptions of Standard vs. Total Cost of Ownership: A Procurement Analysis for Orthopaedic-Powered Instruments.\",\"authors\":\"Aazad Abbas,&nbsp;Olumide Olotu,&nbsp;Sejla Abdic,&nbsp;Albert Yee,&nbsp;Jeremie Larouche,&nbsp;Cari Whyne,&nbsp;Dante Morra,&nbsp;Jay Toor\",\"doi\":\"10.12927/hcq.2023.27050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study compares standard procurement methodology (SPM) with total cost of ownership (TCO) methodology for the procurement of orthopaedic-powered instruments. The authors conducted semi-structured standardized interviews with key hospital procurement stakeholders following consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. Of the 33 hospital procurement stakeholders interviewed, all (100%) reported that SPM would be easier to use than TCO. However, only six (18%) preferred SPM over TCO. Barriers to the adoption of TCO emerged as a theme. Creating TCO frameworks can help to simplify the process for procurement agents and facilitate its adoption in the healthcare sector.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"59-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2023.27050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2023.27050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究比较了标准采购方法(SPM)与总拥有成本(TCO)的骨科动力器械采购方法。作者按照定性研究报告的统一标准,对主要医院采购利益相关者进行了半结构化的标准化访谈。在接受采访的33个医院采购利益相关者中,所有(100%)都报告说SPM比TCO更容易使用。然而,只有6人(18%)更喜欢SPM而不是TCO。采用TCO的障碍成为一个主题。创建TCO框架有助于简化采购代理的流程,并促进其在医疗保健部门的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key Stakeholder Perceptions of Standard vs. Total Cost of Ownership: A Procurement Analysis for Orthopaedic-Powered Instruments.

This study compares standard procurement methodology (SPM) with total cost of ownership (TCO) methodology for the procurement of orthopaedic-powered instruments. The authors conducted semi-structured standardized interviews with key hospital procurement stakeholders following consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. Of the 33 hospital procurement stakeholders interviewed, all (100%) reported that SPM would be easier to use than TCO. However, only six (18%) preferred SPM over TCO. Barriers to the adoption of TCO emerged as a theme. Creating TCO frameworks can help to simplify the process for procurement agents and facilitate its adoption in the healthcare sector.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.)
Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Governing boards of healthcare organizations in Canada are accountable for the performance of their organization and provide oversight on their decisions. Traditionally, many healthcare boards have focused on finances and community relations and have deferred responsibility for quality of care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信