走向语言学意义的统一理论。

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Prakash Mondal
{"title":"走向语言学意义的统一理论。","authors":"Prakash Mondal","doi":"10.1080/19420889.2023.2200666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fundamental tensions exist between formal-logical approaches and cognitive approaches to linguistic meaning. The divergence arises from the fundamental differences in nature and form between formal/mathematical structures of natural language meaning and their cognitive representations. While the former are abstract and logical categories of representations, the latter are ultimately embodied and grounded in sensory-motor systems of the brain. This article aims to motivate a unifying theory/formalism of linguistic meaning from a general biologically integrative perspective in the context of current theorizing in linguistics, neurobiology and cognitive sciences on human language meaning within which two divergent approaches for the mathematical and cognitive aspects of linguistic meaning exist. The tensions can be somewhat neutralized if formal-mathematical structures and cognitive representations of natural language meaning can be shown to have representational duality and unity in brain dynamics. This work shows a broad outline of one, if not the only one, path toward this vision.</p>","PeriodicalId":39647,"journal":{"name":"Communicative and Integrative Biology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2200666"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a unifying theory of linguistic meaning.\",\"authors\":\"Prakash Mondal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19420889.2023.2200666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fundamental tensions exist between formal-logical approaches and cognitive approaches to linguistic meaning. The divergence arises from the fundamental differences in nature and form between formal/mathematical structures of natural language meaning and their cognitive representations. While the former are abstract and logical categories of representations, the latter are ultimately embodied and grounded in sensory-motor systems of the brain. This article aims to motivate a unifying theory/formalism of linguistic meaning from a general biologically integrative perspective in the context of current theorizing in linguistics, neurobiology and cognitive sciences on human language meaning within which two divergent approaches for the mathematical and cognitive aspects of linguistic meaning exist. The tensions can be somewhat neutralized if formal-mathematical structures and cognitive representations of natural language meaning can be shown to have representational duality and unity in brain dynamics. This work shows a broad outline of one, if not the only one, path toward this vision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communicative and Integrative Biology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"2200666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134947/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communicative and Integrative Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2023.2200666\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicative and Integrative Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2023.2200666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语言意义的形式逻辑方法和认知方法之间存在着根本的紧张关系。这种分歧源于自然语言意义的形式/数学结构与其认知表征之间的本质和形式的根本差异。前者是表征的抽象和逻辑范畴,而后者最终体现并扎根于大脑的感觉运动系统。在目前语言学、神经生物学和认知科学对人类语言意义的理论研究中,存在着语言学意义的数学和认知两种不同的研究方法,本文旨在从一般生物学整合的角度激发语言学意义的统一理论/形式主义。如果可以证明形式数学结构和自然语言意义的认知表征在大脑动力学中具有表征的二元性和统一性,那么这种紧张关系可以在一定程度上得到缓解。这项工作展示了实现这一愿景的一条(如果不是唯一的一条)道路的大致轮廓。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Towards a unifying theory of linguistic meaning.

Towards a unifying theory of linguistic meaning.

Towards a unifying theory of linguistic meaning.

Towards a unifying theory of linguistic meaning.

Fundamental tensions exist between formal-logical approaches and cognitive approaches to linguistic meaning. The divergence arises from the fundamental differences in nature and form between formal/mathematical structures of natural language meaning and their cognitive representations. While the former are abstract and logical categories of representations, the latter are ultimately embodied and grounded in sensory-motor systems of the brain. This article aims to motivate a unifying theory/formalism of linguistic meaning from a general biologically integrative perspective in the context of current theorizing in linguistics, neurobiology and cognitive sciences on human language meaning within which two divergent approaches for the mathematical and cognitive aspects of linguistic meaning exist. The tensions can be somewhat neutralized if formal-mathematical structures and cognitive representations of natural language meaning can be shown to have representational duality and unity in brain dynamics. This work shows a broad outline of one, if not the only one, path toward this vision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Communicative and Integrative Biology
Communicative and Integrative Biology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信