实施机制:在第5届两年一次的实施研究合作学会(SIRC)会议上提出的对因果途径的评估。

Sarah F Vejnoska, Kayne Mettert, Cara C Lewis
{"title":"实施机制:在第5届两年一次的实施研究合作学会(SIRC)会议上提出的对因果途径的评估。","authors":"Sarah F Vejnoska,&nbsp;Kayne Mettert,&nbsp;Cara C Lewis","doi":"10.1177/26334895221086271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Implementation mechanisms are defined as processes or events through which implementation strategies operate to affect one or more implementation outcomes. Understanding the mechanisms through which implementation strategies work is critical to understanding how and why implementation efforts are successful, and to matching, tailoring, and optimizing implementation strategies. This study examined the content of abstracts included in the program for the 2019 Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) conference to characterize the presence of data related to implementation strategy mechanisms and their larger causal pathways. <b>Methods</b> Trained coders reviewed all 205 accepted abstracts and extracted information regarding discrete implementation strategies, determinants of implementation, implementation mechanisms, service outcomes, and implementation outcomes. Theoretical articles were omitted from further analyses due to their inability to offer data related to implementation mechanisms. <b>Results</b> Of the 151 empirical studies included, only 11 (7.28%) reported studying mechanisms. Mechanisms were examined in projects utilizing 14 different implementation strategies. We were able to construct implementation causal pathways for just two implementation strategies, \"assess for readiness and identify determinants,\" representing information pulled from four different abstracts, and \"create a learning collaborative,\" with data pulled from just one abstract. <b>Conclusions</b> These findings indicate that, at least based on SIRC conference abstracts, the empirical investigation of implementation mechanisms remains understudied, highlighting the need for focused research on the study of mechanisms. <b>Plain Language Summary</b> Understanding the mechanisms through which implementation strategies work is critical to understanding how and why implementation efforts are successful. The study of implementation mechanisms may be used to optimize implementation strategy decisions. Investigations to date have not established causal pathways linking implementation strategies, mechanisms, barriers, and outcomes. This study examined abstracts included in the program for the 2019 Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) conference. Trained coders reviewed all 205 accepted abstracts and extracted information to characterize the presence of data related to implementation strategy causal pathways. A minority of abstracts reported studying mechanisms. We were able to construct implementation causal pathways for just two implementation strategies, representing information pulled from five different abstracts all together. This highlights the need for focused research on the study of mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/07/b3/10.1177_26334895221086271.PMC9924245.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanisms of implementation: An appraisal of causal pathways presented at the 5th biennial Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) conference.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah F Vejnoska,&nbsp;Kayne Mettert,&nbsp;Cara C Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26334895221086271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b> Implementation mechanisms are defined as processes or events through which implementation strategies operate to affect one or more implementation outcomes. Understanding the mechanisms through which implementation strategies work is critical to understanding how and why implementation efforts are successful, and to matching, tailoring, and optimizing implementation strategies. This study examined the content of abstracts included in the program for the 2019 Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) conference to characterize the presence of data related to implementation strategy mechanisms and their larger causal pathways. <b>Methods</b> Trained coders reviewed all 205 accepted abstracts and extracted information regarding discrete implementation strategies, determinants of implementation, implementation mechanisms, service outcomes, and implementation outcomes. Theoretical articles were omitted from further analyses due to their inability to offer data related to implementation mechanisms. <b>Results</b> Of the 151 empirical studies included, only 11 (7.28%) reported studying mechanisms. Mechanisms were examined in projects utilizing 14 different implementation strategies. We were able to construct implementation causal pathways for just two implementation strategies, \\\"assess for readiness and identify determinants,\\\" representing information pulled from four different abstracts, and \\\"create a learning collaborative,\\\" with data pulled from just one abstract. <b>Conclusions</b> These findings indicate that, at least based on SIRC conference abstracts, the empirical investigation of implementation mechanisms remains understudied, highlighting the need for focused research on the study of mechanisms. <b>Plain Language Summary</b> Understanding the mechanisms through which implementation strategies work is critical to understanding how and why implementation efforts are successful. The study of implementation mechanisms may be used to optimize implementation strategy decisions. Investigations to date have not established causal pathways linking implementation strategies, mechanisms, barriers, and outcomes. This study examined abstracts included in the program for the 2019 Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) conference. Trained coders reviewed all 205 accepted abstracts and extracted information to characterize the presence of data related to implementation strategy causal pathways. A minority of abstracts reported studying mechanisms. We were able to construct implementation causal pathways for just two implementation strategies, representing information pulled from five different abstracts all together. This highlights the need for focused research on the study of mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation research and practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/07/b3/10.1177_26334895221086271.PMC9924245.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895221086271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895221086271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

实现机制被定义为过程或事件,实现策略通过这些过程或事件来影响一个或多个实现结果。理解实现策略工作的机制对于理解实现工作如何以及为什么成功,以及匹配、裁剪和优化实现策略至关重要。本研究检查了2019年实施研究合作学会(SIRC)会议计划中包含的摘要内容,以表征与实施战略机制及其更大因果途径相关的数据的存在。方法训练有素的编码人员回顾了所有205个接受的摘要,并提取了有关离散实现策略、实现决定因素、实现机制、服务结果和实现结果的信息。由于无法提供与实施机制有关的数据,理论文章在进一步分析中被省略。结果纳入的151篇实证研究中,仅有11篇(7.28%)报道了机制研究。在采用14种不同实施策略的项目中审查了机制。我们能够仅为两种实现策略构建实现因果路径,“评估准备情况并确定决定因素”,表示从四个不同摘要中提取的信息,以及“创建学习协作”,仅从一个摘要中提取数据。以上研究结果表明,至少从SIRC会议摘要来看,对实施机制的实证研究仍然不足,需要对机制研究进行重点研究。理解实现策略工作的机制对于理解实现工作如何以及为什么成功是至关重要的。对实施机制的研究可用于优化实施策略决策。迄今为止的调查尚未确定将实施战略、机制、障碍和结果联系起来的因果途径。本研究审查了2019年实施研究合作学会(SIRC)会议项目中的摘要。训练有素的编码器审查了所有接受的205个摘要,并提取了信息,以描述与实施战略因果路径相关的数据的存在。少数摘要报告了研究机制。我们能够为两个实现策略构建实现因果路径,表示从五个不同的抽象中提取的信息。这突出了对机制研究进行集中研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mechanisms of implementation: An appraisal of causal pathways presented at the 5th biennial Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) conference.

Mechanisms of implementation: An appraisal of causal pathways presented at the 5th biennial Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) conference.

Mechanisms of implementation: An appraisal of causal pathways presented at the 5th biennial Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) conference.

Mechanisms of implementation: An appraisal of causal pathways presented at the 5th biennial Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) conference.

Background Implementation mechanisms are defined as processes or events through which implementation strategies operate to affect one or more implementation outcomes. Understanding the mechanisms through which implementation strategies work is critical to understanding how and why implementation efforts are successful, and to matching, tailoring, and optimizing implementation strategies. This study examined the content of abstracts included in the program for the 2019 Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) conference to characterize the presence of data related to implementation strategy mechanisms and their larger causal pathways. Methods Trained coders reviewed all 205 accepted abstracts and extracted information regarding discrete implementation strategies, determinants of implementation, implementation mechanisms, service outcomes, and implementation outcomes. Theoretical articles were omitted from further analyses due to their inability to offer data related to implementation mechanisms. Results Of the 151 empirical studies included, only 11 (7.28%) reported studying mechanisms. Mechanisms were examined in projects utilizing 14 different implementation strategies. We were able to construct implementation causal pathways for just two implementation strategies, "assess for readiness and identify determinants," representing information pulled from four different abstracts, and "create a learning collaborative," with data pulled from just one abstract. Conclusions These findings indicate that, at least based on SIRC conference abstracts, the empirical investigation of implementation mechanisms remains understudied, highlighting the need for focused research on the study of mechanisms. Plain Language Summary Understanding the mechanisms through which implementation strategies work is critical to understanding how and why implementation efforts are successful. The study of implementation mechanisms may be used to optimize implementation strategy decisions. Investigations to date have not established causal pathways linking implementation strategies, mechanisms, barriers, and outcomes. This study examined abstracts included in the program for the 2019 Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) conference. Trained coders reviewed all 205 accepted abstracts and extracted information to characterize the presence of data related to implementation strategy causal pathways. A minority of abstracts reported studying mechanisms. We were able to construct implementation causal pathways for just two implementation strategies, representing information pulled from five different abstracts all together. This highlights the need for focused research on the study of mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信