基于传递熵的精确QT校正方法

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Esa Räsänen PhD , Teemu Pukkila , Matias Kanniainen , Minna Miettinen , Rostislav Duda , Jiyeong Kim , Janne Solanpää PhD , Katriina Aalto-Setälä MD , Ilya Potapov PhD
{"title":"基于传递熵的精确QT校正方法","authors":"Esa Räsänen PhD ,&nbsp;Teemu Pukkila ,&nbsp;Matias Kanniainen ,&nbsp;Minna Miettinen ,&nbsp;Rostislav Duda ,&nbsp;Jiyeong Kim ,&nbsp;Janne Solanpää PhD ,&nbsp;Katriina Aalto-Setälä MD ,&nbsp;Ilya Potapov PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The QT interval in the electrocardiogram (ECG) is a fundamental risk measure for arrhythmic adverse cardiac events. However, the QT interval depends on the heart rate and must be corrected accordingly. The present QT correction (QTc) methods are either simple models leading to under- or overcorrection, or impractical in requiring long-term empirical data. In general, there is no consensus on the best QTc method.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We introduce a model-free QTc method—AccuQT—that computes QTc by minimizing the information transfer from R-R to QT intervals. The objective is to establish and validate a QTc method that provides superior stability and reliability without models or empirical data.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We tested AccuQT against the most commonly used QT correction methods by using long-term ECG recordings of more than 200 healthy subjects from PhysioNet and THEW databases.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>AccuQT overperforms the previously reported correction methods: the proportion of false-positives is reduced from 16% (Bazett) to 3% (AccuQT) for the PhysioNet data. In particular, the QTc variance is significantly reduced and thus the RR-QT stability is increased.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>AccuQT has significant potential to become the QTc method of choice in clinical studies and drug development. The method can be implemented in any device recording R-R and QT intervals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accurate QT correction method from transfer entropy\",\"authors\":\"Esa Räsänen PhD ,&nbsp;Teemu Pukkila ,&nbsp;Matias Kanniainen ,&nbsp;Minna Miettinen ,&nbsp;Rostislav Duda ,&nbsp;Jiyeong Kim ,&nbsp;Janne Solanpää PhD ,&nbsp;Katriina Aalto-Setälä MD ,&nbsp;Ilya Potapov PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.10.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The QT interval in the electrocardiogram (ECG) is a fundamental risk measure for arrhythmic adverse cardiac events. However, the QT interval depends on the heart rate and must be corrected accordingly. The present QT correction (QTc) methods are either simple models leading to under- or overcorrection, or impractical in requiring long-term empirical data. In general, there is no consensus on the best QTc method.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We introduce a model-free QTc method—AccuQT—that computes QTc by minimizing the information transfer from R-R to QT intervals. The objective is to establish and validate a QTc method that provides superior stability and reliability without models or empirical data.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We tested AccuQT against the most commonly used QT correction methods by using long-term ECG recordings of more than 200 healthy subjects from PhysioNet and THEW databases.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>AccuQT overperforms the previously reported correction methods: the proportion of false-positives is reduced from 16% (Bazett) to 3% (AccuQT) for the PhysioNet data. In particular, the QTc variance is significantly reduced and thus the RR-QT stability is increased.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>AccuQT has significant potential to become the QTc method of choice in clinical studies and drug development. The method can be implemented in any device recording R-R and QT intervals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9972000/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693622001773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693622001773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景心电图中的QT间期是心律失常不良心脏事件的基本风险指标。然而,QT间期取决于心率,必须进行相应的校正。目前的QT校正(QTc)方法要么是导致校正不足或过度的简单模型,要么在需要长期经验数据时不切实际。一般来说,对于最佳QTc方法没有达成共识。目的介绍一种无模型QTc方法——AccuQT,该方法通过最小化从R-R到QT间期的信息传递来计算QTc。目的是建立和验证一种QTc方法,该方法在没有模型或经验数据的情况下提供卓越的稳定性和可靠性。方法我们使用PhysioNet和THEW数据库中200多名健康受试者的长期心电图记录,将AccuQT与最常用的QT校正方法进行比较。结果AccuQT优于先前报道的校正方法:PhysioNet数据的假阳性比例从16%(Bazett)降低到3%(AccuQT)。特别地,QTc方差显著降低,因此RR-QT稳定性增加。结论AccuQT具有成为临床研究和药物开发中首选的QTc方法的巨大潜力。该方法可以在记录R-R和QT间期的任何设备中实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Accurate QT correction method from transfer entropy

Accurate QT correction method from transfer entropy

Accurate QT correction method from transfer entropy

Accurate QT correction method from transfer entropy

Background

The QT interval in the electrocardiogram (ECG) is a fundamental risk measure for arrhythmic adverse cardiac events. However, the QT interval depends on the heart rate and must be corrected accordingly. The present QT correction (QTc) methods are either simple models leading to under- or overcorrection, or impractical in requiring long-term empirical data. In general, there is no consensus on the best QTc method.

Objective

We introduce a model-free QTc method—AccuQT—that computes QTc by minimizing the information transfer from R-R to QT intervals. The objective is to establish and validate a QTc method that provides superior stability and reliability without models or empirical data.

Methods

We tested AccuQT against the most commonly used QT correction methods by using long-term ECG recordings of more than 200 healthy subjects from PhysioNet and THEW databases.

Results

AccuQT overperforms the previously reported correction methods: the proportion of false-positives is reduced from 16% (Bazett) to 3% (AccuQT) for the PhysioNet data. In particular, the QTc variance is significantly reduced and thus the RR-QT stability is increased.

Conclusion

AccuQT has significant potential to become the QTc method of choice in clinical studies and drug development. The method can be implemented in any device recording R-R and QT intervals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular digital health journal
Cardiovascular digital health journal Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信