一项病例对照研究:即刻乳房再造术后植入物丢失对患者5年后预后和生活质量满意度的影响。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Linn Weick, Carolina Lunde, Emma Hansson
{"title":"一项病例对照研究:即刻乳房再造术后植入物丢失对患者5年后预后和生活质量满意度的影响。","authors":"Linn Weick,&nbsp;Carolina Lunde,&nbsp;Emma Hansson","doi":"10.1080/2000656X.2022.2061501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several advantages have been suggested for immediate breast reconstruction (IBR); however, there is little scientific high-quality evidence confirming those advantages. Disadvantages of IBR, compared to delayed breast reconstruction (DBR), include an increased risk for complications, such as implant loss (prevalence 5-10% vs. 1%). Little is known on how women experience implant loss and how it affects patients' long-term satisfaction and quality of life (QoL). The primary aim of our study was to compare patient satisfaction and QoL of women with implant loss after IBR, with that of women with a successful IBR. Breast-Q, Body Esteem Scale for Adults and Adolescents (BESAA) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were sent to women who had experienced implant loss during the last 10 years. Women of a similar age who were reconstructed, without complications, during the same period were controls. The results suggest that there might be a more permanent negative effect on satisfaction and QoL following implant loss. The proportion of possible cases of depression was higher among patients who had experienced implant loss. The findings could indicate that in patients with an elevated risk for implant loss, the possible benefits with IBR should be carefully balanced against the effects of implant loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":16847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","volume":"57 1-6","pages":"263-270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of implant loss after immediate breast reconstruction on patient satisfaction with outcome and quality of life after five years - a case-control study.\",\"authors\":\"Linn Weick,&nbsp;Carolina Lunde,&nbsp;Emma Hansson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2000656X.2022.2061501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Several advantages have been suggested for immediate breast reconstruction (IBR); however, there is little scientific high-quality evidence confirming those advantages. Disadvantages of IBR, compared to delayed breast reconstruction (DBR), include an increased risk for complications, such as implant loss (prevalence 5-10% vs. 1%). Little is known on how women experience implant loss and how it affects patients' long-term satisfaction and quality of life (QoL). The primary aim of our study was to compare patient satisfaction and QoL of women with implant loss after IBR, with that of women with a successful IBR. Breast-Q, Body Esteem Scale for Adults and Adolescents (BESAA) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were sent to women who had experienced implant loss during the last 10 years. Women of a similar age who were reconstructed, without complications, during the same period were controls. The results suggest that there might be a more permanent negative effect on satisfaction and QoL following implant loss. The proportion of possible cases of depression was higher among patients who had experienced implant loss. The findings could indicate that in patients with an elevated risk for implant loss, the possible benefits with IBR should be carefully balanced against the effects of implant loss.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery\",\"volume\":\"57 1-6\",\"pages\":\"263-270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2022.2061501\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2022.2061501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有几个优点被建议立即乳房重建(IBR);然而,很少有高质量的科学证据证实这些优势。与延迟乳房重建(DBR)相比,IBR的缺点包括并发症的风险增加,如植入物丢失(患病率为5-10%对1%)。对于女性如何经历种植体丢失以及它如何影响患者的长期满意度和生活质量(QoL)知之甚少。我们研究的主要目的是比较IBR术后种植体丢失的女性患者的满意度和生活质量,以及成功的IBR患者的满意度和生活质量。研究人员将Breast-Q、成人和青少年身体自尊量表(BESAA)和医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)发给在过去10年内经历过植入物丢失的妇女。对照组是年龄相仿的女性,在同一时期进行了重建,没有并发症。结果表明,种植体丢失可能会对满意度和生活质量产生更持久的负面影响。在经历过种植体丢失的患者中,可能出现抑郁症的比例更高。研究结果表明,对于种植体丢失风险较高的患者,应仔细权衡IBR可能带来的益处与种植体丢失的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of implant loss after immediate breast reconstruction on patient satisfaction with outcome and quality of life after five years - a case-control study.

Several advantages have been suggested for immediate breast reconstruction (IBR); however, there is little scientific high-quality evidence confirming those advantages. Disadvantages of IBR, compared to delayed breast reconstruction (DBR), include an increased risk for complications, such as implant loss (prevalence 5-10% vs. 1%). Little is known on how women experience implant loss and how it affects patients' long-term satisfaction and quality of life (QoL). The primary aim of our study was to compare patient satisfaction and QoL of women with implant loss after IBR, with that of women with a successful IBR. Breast-Q, Body Esteem Scale for Adults and Adolescents (BESAA) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were sent to women who had experienced implant loss during the last 10 years. Women of a similar age who were reconstructed, without complications, during the same period were controls. The results suggest that there might be a more permanent negative effect on satisfaction and QoL following implant loss. The proportion of possible cases of depression was higher among patients who had experienced implant loss. The findings could indicate that in patients with an elevated risk for implant loss, the possible benefits with IBR should be carefully balanced against the effects of implant loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery is to serve as an international forum for plastic surgery, hand surgery and related research. Interest is focused on original articles on basic research and clinical evaluation. The scope of the journal comprises: • Articles concerning operative methods and follow-up studies • Research articles on subjects related to plastic and hand surgery • Articles on cranio-maxillofacial surgery, including cleft lip and palate surgery. Extended issues are published occasionally, dealing with special topics such as microvascular surgery, craniofacial surgery, or burns. Supplements, usually doctoral theses, may also be published. The journal is published for the Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica society and sponsored by the Key Foundation, Sweden. The journal was previously published as Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信