格鲁吉亚的远程医疗人工流产服务:对减少门诊次数战略的评价。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nino Tsereteli, Lia Mamatsashvili, George Tsertsvadze, Tamar Tsereteli, Ingrida Platais
{"title":"格鲁吉亚的远程医疗人工流产服务:对减少门诊次数战略的评价。","authors":"Nino Tsereteli,&nbsp;Lia Mamatsashvili,&nbsp;George Tsertsvadze,&nbsp;Tamar Tsereteli,&nbsp;Ingrida Platais","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2023.2170710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate feasibility and acceptability of a medical abortion service that offers: a telemedicine visit (in place of an in-person visit) during a mandatory waiting period, and at-home follow-up with the use of multi-level pregnancy tests (MLPT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were screened for eligibility in clinic, and during the waiting period, received a telephone call to confirm desire to proceed with the service. Participants were mailed a study package containing mifepristone, misoprostol, two multi-level pregnancy tests, and instructions for their use. Follow-up consultation took place by phone to evaluate abortion completeness. The analysis was descriptive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred twenty-two participants were enrolled in the study, and 120 chose to proceed with the abortion after the waiting period and were sent a study package. One participant was lost to follow up. The majority of participants did not experience problems receiving the study package (94.1%, <i>n</i> = 112), took mifepristone (100%, <i>n</i> = 119), misoprostol (99.2%, <i>n</i> = 118), and MLPTs (99.1%, <i>n</i> = 116) as instructed, and forwent additional clinic visits (91.6%, <i>n</i> = 109). All participants were satisfied with the service. Most participants had a complete abortion without a procedure (95.8%, <i>n</i> = 114).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The adapted telemedicine medical abortion service was feasible and satisfactory to participants and has the potential to make medical abortion more patient-centered where waiting periods are mandated.</p>","PeriodicalId":50491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemedicine medical abortion service in Georgia: an evaluation of a strategy with reduced number of in-Clinic visits.\",\"authors\":\"Nino Tsereteli,&nbsp;Lia Mamatsashvili,&nbsp;George Tsertsvadze,&nbsp;Tamar Tsereteli,&nbsp;Ingrida Platais\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13625187.2023.2170710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate feasibility and acceptability of a medical abortion service that offers: a telemedicine visit (in place of an in-person visit) during a mandatory waiting period, and at-home follow-up with the use of multi-level pregnancy tests (MLPT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were screened for eligibility in clinic, and during the waiting period, received a telephone call to confirm desire to proceed with the service. Participants were mailed a study package containing mifepristone, misoprostol, two multi-level pregnancy tests, and instructions for their use. Follow-up consultation took place by phone to evaluate abortion completeness. The analysis was descriptive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred twenty-two participants were enrolled in the study, and 120 chose to proceed with the abortion after the waiting period and were sent a study package. One participant was lost to follow up. The majority of participants did not experience problems receiving the study package (94.1%, <i>n</i> = 112), took mifepristone (100%, <i>n</i> = 119), misoprostol (99.2%, <i>n</i> = 118), and MLPTs (99.1%, <i>n</i> = 116) as instructed, and forwent additional clinic visits (91.6%, <i>n</i> = 109). All participants were satisfied with the service. Most participants had a complete abortion without a procedure (95.8%, <i>n</i> = 114).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The adapted telemedicine medical abortion service was feasible and satisfactory to participants and has the potential to make medical abortion more patient-centered where waiting periods are mandated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2023.2170710\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2023.2170710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评估一项医疗流产服务的可行性和可接受性,该服务提供:在强制等待期间进行远程医疗就诊(代替亲自就诊),以及使用多级妊娠试验(MLPT)在家中进行随访。方法:在临床筛选参与者的资格,并在等待期间,收到一个电话,以确认希望继续进行服务。参与者邮寄了一个研究包,其中包含米非司酮、米索前列醇、两种多级妊娠试验,以及它们的使用说明。通过电话进行随访咨询以评估流产的完全性。分析是描述性的。结果:共纳入122人,其中120人在等待期后选择继续流产,并发给研究包。1名参与者失去随访机会。大多数参与者在接受研究包时没有遇到问题(94.1%,n = 112),按照指示服用了米非司酮(100%,n = 119)、米索前列醇(99.2%,n = 118)和MLPTs (99.1%, n = 116),并放弃了额外的诊所就诊(91.6%,n = 109)。所有参与者都对服务感到满意。大多数参与者在没有手术的情况下完全流产(95.8%,n = 114)。结论:适应远程医疗的人工流产服务是可行的,参与者满意,并有可能使人工流产更加以患者为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Telemedicine medical abortion service in Georgia: an evaluation of a strategy with reduced number of in-Clinic visits.

Purpose: To evaluate feasibility and acceptability of a medical abortion service that offers: a telemedicine visit (in place of an in-person visit) during a mandatory waiting period, and at-home follow-up with the use of multi-level pregnancy tests (MLPT).

Methods: Participants were screened for eligibility in clinic, and during the waiting period, received a telephone call to confirm desire to proceed with the service. Participants were mailed a study package containing mifepristone, misoprostol, two multi-level pregnancy tests, and instructions for their use. Follow-up consultation took place by phone to evaluate abortion completeness. The analysis was descriptive.

Results: One-hundred twenty-two participants were enrolled in the study, and 120 chose to proceed with the abortion after the waiting period and were sent a study package. One participant was lost to follow up. The majority of participants did not experience problems receiving the study package (94.1%, n = 112), took mifepristone (100%, n = 119), misoprostol (99.2%, n = 118), and MLPTs (99.1%, n = 116) as instructed, and forwent additional clinic visits (91.6%, n = 109). All participants were satisfied with the service. Most participants had a complete abortion without a procedure (95.8%, n = 114).

Conclusions: The adapted telemedicine medical abortion service was feasible and satisfactory to participants and has the potential to make medical abortion more patient-centered where waiting periods are mandated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health, The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信