非药物干预预防和治疗化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN):来自系统范围评价和专家共识过程的临床建议。

Q1 Medicine
Nadja Klafke, Jasmin Bossert, Birgit Kröger, Petra Neuberger, Ute Heyder, Monika Layer, Marcela Winkler, Christel Idler, Elke Kaschdailewitsch, Rolf Heine, Heike John, Tatjana Zielke, Beeke Schmeling, Sosamma Joy, Isabel Mertens, Burcu Babadag-Savas, Sara Kohler, Cornelia Mahler, Claudia M Witt, Diana Steinmann, Petra Voiss, Regina Stolz
{"title":"非药物干预预防和治疗化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN):来自系统范围评价和专家共识过程的临床建议。","authors":"Nadja Klafke,&nbsp;Jasmin Bossert,&nbsp;Birgit Kröger,&nbsp;Petra Neuberger,&nbsp;Ute Heyder,&nbsp;Monika Layer,&nbsp;Marcela Winkler,&nbsp;Christel Idler,&nbsp;Elke Kaschdailewitsch,&nbsp;Rolf Heine,&nbsp;Heike John,&nbsp;Tatjana Zielke,&nbsp;Beeke Schmeling,&nbsp;Sosamma Joy,&nbsp;Isabel Mertens,&nbsp;Burcu Babadag-Savas,&nbsp;Sara Kohler,&nbsp;Cornelia Mahler,&nbsp;Claudia M Witt,&nbsp;Diana Steinmann,&nbsp;Petra Voiss,&nbsp;Regina Stolz","doi":"10.3390/medsci11010015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Most individuals affected by cancer who are treated with certain chemotherapies suffer of CIPN. Therefore, there is a high patient and provider interest in complementary non-pharmacological therapies, but its evidence base has not yet been clearly pointed out in the context of CIPN. <b>Methods:</b> The results of a scoping review overviewing the published clinical evidence on the application of complementary therapies for improving the complex CIPN symptomatology are synthesized with the recommendations of an expert consensus process aiming to draw attention to supportive strategies for CIPN. The scoping review, registered at PROSPERO 2020 (CRD 42020165851), followed the PRISMA-ScR and JBI guidelines. Relevant studies published in Pubmed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PEDro, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL between 2000 and 2021 were included. CASP was used to evaluate the methodologic quality of the studies. <b>Results:</b> Seventy-five studies with mixed study quality met the inclusion criteria. Manipulative therapies (including massage, reflexology, therapeutic touch), rhythmical embrocations, movement and mind-body therapies, acupuncture/acupressure, and TENS/Scrambler therapy were the most frequently analyzed in research and may be effective treatment options for CIPN. The expert panel approved 17 supportive interventions, most of them were phytotherapeutic interventions including external applications and cryotherapy, hydrotherapy, and tactile stimulation. More than two-thirds of the consented interventions were rated with moderate to high perceived clinical effectiveness in therapeutic use. <b>Conclusions:</b> The evidence of both the review and the expert panel supports a variety of complementary procedures regarding the supportive treatment of CIPN; however, the application on patients should be individually weighed in each case. Based on this meta-synthesis, interprofessional healthcare teams may open up a dialogue with patients interested in non-pharmacological treatment options to tailor complementary counselling and treatments to their needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9944490/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) with Non-Pharmacological Interventions: Clinical Recommendations from a Systematic Scoping Review and an Expert Consensus Process.\",\"authors\":\"Nadja Klafke,&nbsp;Jasmin Bossert,&nbsp;Birgit Kröger,&nbsp;Petra Neuberger,&nbsp;Ute Heyder,&nbsp;Monika Layer,&nbsp;Marcela Winkler,&nbsp;Christel Idler,&nbsp;Elke Kaschdailewitsch,&nbsp;Rolf Heine,&nbsp;Heike John,&nbsp;Tatjana Zielke,&nbsp;Beeke Schmeling,&nbsp;Sosamma Joy,&nbsp;Isabel Mertens,&nbsp;Burcu Babadag-Savas,&nbsp;Sara Kohler,&nbsp;Cornelia Mahler,&nbsp;Claudia M Witt,&nbsp;Diana Steinmann,&nbsp;Petra Voiss,&nbsp;Regina Stolz\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medsci11010015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Most individuals affected by cancer who are treated with certain chemotherapies suffer of CIPN. Therefore, there is a high patient and provider interest in complementary non-pharmacological therapies, but its evidence base has not yet been clearly pointed out in the context of CIPN. <b>Methods:</b> The results of a scoping review overviewing the published clinical evidence on the application of complementary therapies for improving the complex CIPN symptomatology are synthesized with the recommendations of an expert consensus process aiming to draw attention to supportive strategies for CIPN. The scoping review, registered at PROSPERO 2020 (CRD 42020165851), followed the PRISMA-ScR and JBI guidelines. Relevant studies published in Pubmed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PEDro, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL between 2000 and 2021 were included. CASP was used to evaluate the methodologic quality of the studies. <b>Results:</b> Seventy-five studies with mixed study quality met the inclusion criteria. Manipulative therapies (including massage, reflexology, therapeutic touch), rhythmical embrocations, movement and mind-body therapies, acupuncture/acupressure, and TENS/Scrambler therapy were the most frequently analyzed in research and may be effective treatment options for CIPN. The expert panel approved 17 supportive interventions, most of them were phytotherapeutic interventions including external applications and cryotherapy, hydrotherapy, and tactile stimulation. More than two-thirds of the consented interventions were rated with moderate to high perceived clinical effectiveness in therapeutic use. <b>Conclusions:</b> The evidence of both the review and the expert panel supports a variety of complementary procedures regarding the supportive treatment of CIPN; however, the application on patients should be individually weighed in each case. Based on this meta-synthesis, interprofessional healthcare teams may open up a dialogue with patients interested in non-pharmacological treatment options to tailor complementary counselling and treatments to their needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9944490/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci11010015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci11010015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:大多数接受特定化疗的癌症患者都患有CIPN。因此,患者和提供者对补充非药物治疗有很高的兴趣,但在CIPN的背景下,其证据基础尚未明确指出。方法:对已发表的辅助疗法用于改善复杂CIPN症状的临床证据进行范围审查的结果与专家共识过程的建议相结合,旨在引起对CIPN支持策略的关注。在PROSPERO 2020 (CRD 42020165851)注册的范围审查遵循PRISMA-ScR和JBI指南。纳入2000 - 2021年间在Pubmed/MEDLINE、PsycINFO、PEDro、Cochrane CENTRAL和CINAHL上发表的相关研究。CASP用于评价研究的方法学质量。结果:75项混合质量的研究符合纳入标准。手法疗法(包括按摩、反射疗法、治疗性触摸)、有节奏的按摩、运动和身心疗法、针灸/指压和TENS/扰频疗法是研究中最常分析的,可能是CIPN的有效治疗选择。专家小组批准了17项支持干预措施,其中大多数是植物治疗干预措施,包括外敷和冷冻疗法、水疗和触觉刺激。超过三分之二的同意干预措施在治疗使用中被评为中度到高度的临床疗效。结论:综述和专家小组的证据都支持关于CIPN支持性治疗的各种补充程序;然而,对患者的应用应在每个情况下单独权衡。基于这一综合,跨专业医疗团队可以与对非药物治疗方案感兴趣的患者展开对话,根据他们的需求量身定制补充咨询和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) with Non-Pharmacological Interventions: Clinical Recommendations from a Systematic Scoping Review and an Expert Consensus Process.

Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) with Non-Pharmacological Interventions: Clinical Recommendations from a Systematic Scoping Review and an Expert Consensus Process.

Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) with Non-Pharmacological Interventions: Clinical Recommendations from a Systematic Scoping Review and an Expert Consensus Process.

Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) with Non-Pharmacological Interventions: Clinical Recommendations from a Systematic Scoping Review and an Expert Consensus Process.

Background: Most individuals affected by cancer who are treated with certain chemotherapies suffer of CIPN. Therefore, there is a high patient and provider interest in complementary non-pharmacological therapies, but its evidence base has not yet been clearly pointed out in the context of CIPN. Methods: The results of a scoping review overviewing the published clinical evidence on the application of complementary therapies for improving the complex CIPN symptomatology are synthesized with the recommendations of an expert consensus process aiming to draw attention to supportive strategies for CIPN. The scoping review, registered at PROSPERO 2020 (CRD 42020165851), followed the PRISMA-ScR and JBI guidelines. Relevant studies published in Pubmed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PEDro, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL between 2000 and 2021 were included. CASP was used to evaluate the methodologic quality of the studies. Results: Seventy-five studies with mixed study quality met the inclusion criteria. Manipulative therapies (including massage, reflexology, therapeutic touch), rhythmical embrocations, movement and mind-body therapies, acupuncture/acupressure, and TENS/Scrambler therapy were the most frequently analyzed in research and may be effective treatment options for CIPN. The expert panel approved 17 supportive interventions, most of them were phytotherapeutic interventions including external applications and cryotherapy, hydrotherapy, and tactile stimulation. More than two-thirds of the consented interventions were rated with moderate to high perceived clinical effectiveness in therapeutic use. Conclusions: The evidence of both the review and the expert panel supports a variety of complementary procedures regarding the supportive treatment of CIPN; however, the application on patients should be individually weighed in each case. Based on this meta-synthesis, interprofessional healthcare teams may open up a dialogue with patients interested in non-pharmacological treatment options to tailor complementary counselling and treatments to their needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信