在模拟漂移中施用亚剂量 2,4-D 或麦草畏造成的大豆伤害。

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Rodrigo T Nunes, Alfredo Junior P Albrecht, Leandro P Albrecht, Juliano B Lorenzetti, Maikon Tiago Y Danilussi, Roniereson Mateus H da Silva, André Felipe M Silva, Arthur A M Barroso
{"title":"在模拟漂移中施用亚剂量 2,4-D 或麦草畏造成的大豆伤害。","authors":"Rodrigo T Nunes, Alfredo Junior P Albrecht, Leandro P Albrecht, Juliano B Lorenzetti, Maikon Tiago Y Danilussi, Roniereson Mateus H da Silva, André Felipe M Silva, Arthur A M Barroso","doi":"10.1080/03601234.2023.2173927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>2,4-D or dicamba can cause injuries and other deleterious effects on non-tolerant soybeans. Thus, the objective was to evaluate the potential for injury of subdoses of 2,4-D or dicamba, in drift simulation, for application in non-tolerant soybeans. Two experiments were carried out, one with 2,4-D and the other with dicamba. The treatments consisted of the application, in post-emergence of non-tolerant soybean, of subdoses 0; 1.35; 2.68; 5.37; 10.72; 21.45 and 42.9 g acid equivalent (ae) ha<sup>-1</sup> 2,4-D choline salt or dicamba diglycolamine (DGA) salt. Injury symptoms in plants, plant height and yield were evaluated, and the results were subjected to regression analysis. Polynomial fit was possible for the doses of both herbicides, with deleterious effects on soybean, with reductions in height and yield. The application of 2,4-D ≥ 10.72 g ae ha<sup>-1</sup> was enough to cause injuries greater than 10% in plants, in simulated drift. The application of dicamba ≥1.35 g ae ha<sup>-1</sup> was enough to cause injuries greater than 30% in plants, in simulated drift. For both herbicides, greater potential for injury and reductions in soybean yield were observed for the application of the highest doses (21.45 and 42.9 g ae ha<sup>-1</sup>).</p>","PeriodicalId":15720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes","volume":"58 4","pages":"327-333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soybean injury caused by the application of subdoses of 2,4-D or dicamba, in simulated drift.\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo T Nunes, Alfredo Junior P Albrecht, Leandro P Albrecht, Juliano B Lorenzetti, Maikon Tiago Y Danilussi, Roniereson Mateus H da Silva, André Felipe M Silva, Arthur A M Barroso\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03601234.2023.2173927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>2,4-D or dicamba can cause injuries and other deleterious effects on non-tolerant soybeans. Thus, the objective was to evaluate the potential for injury of subdoses of 2,4-D or dicamba, in drift simulation, for application in non-tolerant soybeans. Two experiments were carried out, one with 2,4-D and the other with dicamba. The treatments consisted of the application, in post-emergence of non-tolerant soybean, of subdoses 0; 1.35; 2.68; 5.37; 10.72; 21.45 and 42.9 g acid equivalent (ae) ha<sup>-1</sup> 2,4-D choline salt or dicamba diglycolamine (DGA) salt. Injury symptoms in plants, plant height and yield were evaluated, and the results were subjected to regression analysis. Polynomial fit was possible for the doses of both herbicides, with deleterious effects on soybean, with reductions in height and yield. The application of 2,4-D ≥ 10.72 g ae ha<sup>-1</sup> was enough to cause injuries greater than 10% in plants, in simulated drift. The application of dicamba ≥1.35 g ae ha<sup>-1</sup> was enough to cause injuries greater than 30% in plants, in simulated drift. For both herbicides, greater potential for injury and reductions in soybean yield were observed for the application of the highest doses (21.45 and 42.9 g ae ha<sup>-1</sup>).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes\",\"volume\":\"58 4\",\"pages\":\"327-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2023.2173927\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2023.2173927","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2,4-D 或麦草畏会对非耐受性大豆造成伤害和其他有害影响。因此,我们的目标是通过漂移模拟,评估在非耐受性大豆上施用亚剂量的 2,4-D 或麦草畏可能造成的伤害。共进行了两次实验,一次使用 2,4-D,另一次使用麦草畏。处理包括在非耐受性大豆萌发后施用 0、1.35、2.68、5.37、10.72、21.45 和 42.9 克酸当量(ae)公顷-1 的 2,4-D 胆碱盐或麦草畏二甘醇胺(DGA)盐。对植株的受害症状、株高和产量进行了评估,并对结果进行了回归分析。这两种除草剂的剂量均可进行多项式拟合,对大豆产生有害影响,导致株高和产量下降。在模拟漂移中,2,4-D ≥ 10.72 g ae ha-1 的施用量足以对植物造成超过 10%的伤害。在模拟漂移中,施用麦草畏≥1.35 g ae ha-1足以对植物造成超过30%的伤害。对于这两种除草剂,施用最高剂量(21.45 和 42.9 g ae ha-1)时,大豆可能受到的伤害更大,产量也会减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soybean injury caused by the application of subdoses of 2,4-D or dicamba, in simulated drift.

2,4-D or dicamba can cause injuries and other deleterious effects on non-tolerant soybeans. Thus, the objective was to evaluate the potential for injury of subdoses of 2,4-D or dicamba, in drift simulation, for application in non-tolerant soybeans. Two experiments were carried out, one with 2,4-D and the other with dicamba. The treatments consisted of the application, in post-emergence of non-tolerant soybean, of subdoses 0; 1.35; 2.68; 5.37; 10.72; 21.45 and 42.9 g acid equivalent (ae) ha-1 2,4-D choline salt or dicamba diglycolamine (DGA) salt. Injury symptoms in plants, plant height and yield were evaluated, and the results were subjected to regression analysis. Polynomial fit was possible for the doses of both herbicides, with deleterious effects on soybean, with reductions in height and yield. The application of 2,4-D ≥ 10.72 g ae ha-1 was enough to cause injuries greater than 10% in plants, in simulated drift. The application of dicamba ≥1.35 g ae ha-1 was enough to cause injuries greater than 30% in plants, in simulated drift. For both herbicides, greater potential for injury and reductions in soybean yield were observed for the application of the highest doses (21.45 and 42.9 g ae ha-1).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: 12 issues per year Abstracted/indexed in: Agricola; Analytical Abstracts; ASFA 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality; BioSciences Information Service of Biological Abstracts (BIOSIS); CAB Abstracts; CAB AGBiotech News and Information; CAB Irrigation & Drainage Abstracts; CAB Soils & Fertilizers Abstracts; Chemical Abstracts Service Plus; CSA Aluminum Industry Abstracts; CSA ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology and Engineering; CSA ASFA 3 Aquatic Pollution and Environmental Quality; CSA ASSIA: Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts; CSA Ecology Abstracts; CSA Entomology Abstracts; CSA Environmental Engineering Abstracts; CSA Health & Safety Science Abstracts; CSA Pollution Abstracts; CSA Toxicology Abstracts; CSA Water Resource Abstracts; EBSCOhost Online Research Databases; Elsevier BIOBASE/Current Awareness in Biological Sciences; Elsevier Engineering Information: EMBASE/Excerpta Medica/ Engineering Index/COMPENDEX PLUS; Environment Abstracts; Environmental Knowledge; Food Science and Technology Abstracts; Geo Abstracts; Geobase; Food Science; Index Medicus/ MEDLINE; INIST-Pascal/ CNRS; NIOSHTIC; ISI BIOSIS Previews; Pesticides; Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes: Analytical Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts; PubSCIENCE; Reference Update; Research Alert; Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE); and Water Resources Abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信