阴道纱布充填技术加或不加气囊在宫颈癌近距离高剂量治疗中的比较:一项交叉随机对照试验。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Rishanthini Dhanapalan, Jagadesan Pandjatcharam, K Saravanan, Ninad Harish Patil
{"title":"阴道纱布充填技术加或不加气囊在宫颈癌近距离高剂量治疗中的比较:一项交叉随机对照试验。","authors":"Rishanthini Dhanapalan,&nbsp;Jagadesan Pandjatcharam,&nbsp;K Saravanan,&nbsp;Ninad Harish Patil","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2022.123975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the rectal and bladder doses using two different vaginal packing techniques among uterine cervical cancer patients receiving high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-five patients with cervical cancer were randomized to receive two sessions of ICBT using tandem and ring applicator (Varian<sup>©</sup>), following completion of pelvic external beam radiotherapy treatment. The procedure was performed with vaginal balloon plus gauze packing or vaginal gauze packing alone, each of which was used in one of two sessions. Sequence of the type of vaginal packing was chosen with computer-generated block randomization. A HDR dose of 8.5 Gy was prescribed to point A in all patients. Volumetric dose parameters, such as D<sub>0.1cc</sub>, D<sub>0.5cc</sub>, D<sub>1cc</sub>, and D<sub>2cc</sub> of the rectum and bladder were compared between the two techniques of vaginal packing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 51 years. Majority (88%) of patients had locally advanced stages of cancer at baseline (stage IIB or more). Rectal doses were significantly less in combined packing technique (D<sub>0.1cc</sub>: 7.52 Gy vs. 9.02 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.01; D<sub>0.5cc</sub>: 6.46 Gy vs. 7.42 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.01; D<sub>1cc</sub>: 5.91 Gy vs. 6.7 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.01; D<sub>2cc</sub>: 5.29 Gy vs. 5.97 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Bladder doses were higher in the combined packing technique (D<sub>0.1cc</sub>: 11.20 Gy vs. 10.76 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.18; D<sub>0.5cc</sub>: 9.64 Gy vs. 9.32 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.56; D<sub>1cc</sub>: 8.64 Gy vs. 8.36 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.55; D<sub>2cc</sub>: 7.56 vs. 7.33 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.55).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined vaginal packing resulted in statistically significant reduction in rectal radiation dose compared with standard vaginal gauze packing in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervix cancer using tandem and ring applicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"14 6","pages":"551-559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bb/1f/JCB-14-49845.PMC9924150.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of vaginal gauze packing technique with or without balloon in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of uterine cervical cancer: A crossover randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rishanthini Dhanapalan,&nbsp;Jagadesan Pandjatcharam,&nbsp;K Saravanan,&nbsp;Ninad Harish Patil\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/jcb.2022.123975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the rectal and bladder doses using two different vaginal packing techniques among uterine cervical cancer patients receiving high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-five patients with cervical cancer were randomized to receive two sessions of ICBT using tandem and ring applicator (Varian<sup>©</sup>), following completion of pelvic external beam radiotherapy treatment. The procedure was performed with vaginal balloon plus gauze packing or vaginal gauze packing alone, each of which was used in one of two sessions. Sequence of the type of vaginal packing was chosen with computer-generated block randomization. A HDR dose of 8.5 Gy was prescribed to point A in all patients. Volumetric dose parameters, such as D<sub>0.1cc</sub>, D<sub>0.5cc</sub>, D<sub>1cc</sub>, and D<sub>2cc</sub> of the rectum and bladder were compared between the two techniques of vaginal packing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 51 years. Majority (88%) of patients had locally advanced stages of cancer at baseline (stage IIB or more). Rectal doses were significantly less in combined packing technique (D<sub>0.1cc</sub>: 7.52 Gy vs. 9.02 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.01; D<sub>0.5cc</sub>: 6.46 Gy vs. 7.42 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.01; D<sub>1cc</sub>: 5.91 Gy vs. 6.7 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.01; D<sub>2cc</sub>: 5.29 Gy vs. 5.97 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Bladder doses were higher in the combined packing technique (D<sub>0.1cc</sub>: 11.20 Gy vs. 10.76 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.18; D<sub>0.5cc</sub>: 9.64 Gy vs. 9.32 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.56; D<sub>1cc</sub>: 8.64 Gy vs. 8.36 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.55; D<sub>2cc</sub>: 7.56 vs. 7.33 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.55).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined vaginal packing resulted in statistically significant reduction in rectal radiation dose compared with standard vaginal gauze packing in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervix cancer using tandem and ring applicators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"551-559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bb/1f/JCB-14-49845.PMC9924150.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2022.123975\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2022.123975","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较两种不同阴道填塞技术在接受高剂量率腔内近距离放射治疗(ICBT)的宫颈癌患者中直肠和膀胱的剂量。材料与方法:45例宫颈癌患者在完成盆腔外束放射治疗后,随机分为两组,分别采用串联和环形涂抹器(Varian©)进行ICBT治疗。该手术采用阴道气囊加纱布填充或单独阴道纱布填充,每种方法在两个疗程中使用一次。阴道填塞类型的顺序通过计算机生成的块随机化来选择。所有患者均给予A点8.5 Gy的HDR剂量。比较两种阴道填塞方式直肠和膀胱D0.1cc、D0.5cc、D1cc、D2cc等体积剂量参数。结果:患者平均年龄51岁。大多数(88%)患者在基线时为局部晚期癌症(IIB期或以上)。直肠剂量明显低于联合包装技术(D0.1cc: 7.52 Gy vs. 9.02 Gy, p = 0.01;D0.5cc: 6.46 Gy vs. 7.42 Gy, p < 0.01;D1cc: 5.91 Gy vs. 6.7 Gy, p < 0.01;D2cc: 5.29 Gy vs. 5.97 Gy, p < 0.01)。联合包装技术的膀胱剂量更高(D0.1cc: 11.20 Gy vs. 10.76 Gy, p = 0.18;D0.5cc: 9.64 Gy vs. 9.32 Gy, p = 0.56;D1cc: 8.64 Gy vs. 8.36 Gy, p = 0.55;D2cc: 7.56 Gy对7.33 Gy, p = 0.55)。结论:与标准阴道纱布包装相比,复合阴道纱布包装在高剂量率宫颈癌近距离放射治疗中的直肠辐射剂量有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of vaginal gauze packing technique with or without balloon in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of uterine cervical cancer: A crossover randomized controlled trial.

Comparison of vaginal gauze packing technique with or without balloon in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of uterine cervical cancer: A crossover randomized controlled trial.

Comparison of vaginal gauze packing technique with or without balloon in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of uterine cervical cancer: A crossover randomized controlled trial.

Comparison of vaginal gauze packing technique with or without balloon in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of uterine cervical cancer: A crossover randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: To compare the rectal and bladder doses using two different vaginal packing techniques among uterine cervical cancer patients receiving high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT).

Material and methods: Forty-five patients with cervical cancer were randomized to receive two sessions of ICBT using tandem and ring applicator (Varian©), following completion of pelvic external beam radiotherapy treatment. The procedure was performed with vaginal balloon plus gauze packing or vaginal gauze packing alone, each of which was used in one of two sessions. Sequence of the type of vaginal packing was chosen with computer-generated block randomization. A HDR dose of 8.5 Gy was prescribed to point A in all patients. Volumetric dose parameters, such as D0.1cc, D0.5cc, D1cc, and D2cc of the rectum and bladder were compared between the two techniques of vaginal packing.

Results: The mean age of patients was 51 years. Majority (88%) of patients had locally advanced stages of cancer at baseline (stage IIB or more). Rectal doses were significantly less in combined packing technique (D0.1cc: 7.52 Gy vs. 9.02 Gy, p = 0.01; D0.5cc: 6.46 Gy vs. 7.42 Gy, p < 0.01; D1cc: 5.91 Gy vs. 6.7 Gy, p < 0.01; D2cc: 5.29 Gy vs. 5.97 Gy, p < 0.01). Bladder doses were higher in the combined packing technique (D0.1cc: 11.20 Gy vs. 10.76 Gy, p = 0.18; D0.5cc: 9.64 Gy vs. 9.32 Gy, p = 0.56; D1cc: 8.64 Gy vs. 8.36 Gy, p = 0.55; D2cc: 7.56 vs. 7.33 Gy, p = 0.55).

Conclusions: Combined vaginal packing resulted in statistically significant reduction in rectal radiation dose compared with standard vaginal gauze packing in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervix cancer using tandem and ring applicators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The “Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy” is an international and multidisciplinary journal that will publish papers of original research as well as reviews of articles. Main subjects of the journal include: clinical brachytherapy, combined modality treatment, advances in radiobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as physical aspects relevant to brachytherapy, particularly in the field of imaging, dosimetry and radiation therapy planning. Original contributions will include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization and normal tissue protection, molecular radiation biology, and clinical investigations of cancer treatment in brachytherapy. Another field of interest will be the educational part of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信