下载PDF
{"title":"阴道纱布充填技术加或不加气囊在宫颈癌近距离高剂量治疗中的比较:一项交叉随机对照试验。","authors":"Rishanthini Dhanapalan, Jagadesan Pandjatcharam, K Saravanan, Ninad Harish Patil","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2022.123975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the rectal and bladder doses using two different vaginal packing techniques among uterine cervical cancer patients receiving high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-five patients with cervical cancer were randomized to receive two sessions of ICBT using tandem and ring applicator (Varian<sup>©</sup>), following completion of pelvic external beam radiotherapy treatment. The procedure was performed with vaginal balloon plus gauze packing or vaginal gauze packing alone, each of which was used in one of two sessions. Sequence of the type of vaginal packing was chosen with computer-generated block randomization. A HDR dose of 8.5 Gy was prescribed to point A in all patients. Volumetric dose parameters, such as D<sub>0.1cc</sub>, D<sub>0.5cc</sub>, D<sub>1cc</sub>, and D<sub>2cc</sub> of the rectum and bladder were compared between the two techniques of vaginal packing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 51 years. Majority (88%) of patients had locally advanced stages of cancer at baseline (stage IIB or more). Rectal doses were significantly less in combined packing technique (D<sub>0.1cc</sub>: 7.52 Gy vs. 9.02 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.01; D<sub>0.5cc</sub>: 6.46 Gy vs. 7.42 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.01; D<sub>1cc</sub>: 5.91 Gy vs. 6.7 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.01; D<sub>2cc</sub>: 5.29 Gy vs. 5.97 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Bladder doses were higher in the combined packing technique (D<sub>0.1cc</sub>: 11.20 Gy vs. 10.76 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.18; D<sub>0.5cc</sub>: 9.64 Gy vs. 9.32 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.56; D<sub>1cc</sub>: 8.64 Gy vs. 8.36 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.55; D<sub>2cc</sub>: 7.56 vs. 7.33 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.55).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined vaginal packing resulted in statistically significant reduction in rectal radiation dose compared with standard vaginal gauze packing in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervix cancer using tandem and ring applicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"14 6","pages":"551-559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bb/1f/JCB-14-49845.PMC9924150.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of vaginal gauze packing technique with or without balloon in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of uterine cervical cancer: A crossover randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rishanthini Dhanapalan, Jagadesan Pandjatcharam, K Saravanan, Ninad Harish Patil\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/jcb.2022.123975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the rectal and bladder doses using two different vaginal packing techniques among uterine cervical cancer patients receiving high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-five patients with cervical cancer were randomized to receive two sessions of ICBT using tandem and ring applicator (Varian<sup>©</sup>), following completion of pelvic external beam radiotherapy treatment. The procedure was performed with vaginal balloon plus gauze packing or vaginal gauze packing alone, each of which was used in one of two sessions. Sequence of the type of vaginal packing was chosen with computer-generated block randomization. A HDR dose of 8.5 Gy was prescribed to point A in all patients. Volumetric dose parameters, such as D<sub>0.1cc</sub>, D<sub>0.5cc</sub>, D<sub>1cc</sub>, and D<sub>2cc</sub> of the rectum and bladder were compared between the two techniques of vaginal packing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 51 years. Majority (88%) of patients had locally advanced stages of cancer at baseline (stage IIB or more). Rectal doses were significantly less in combined packing technique (D<sub>0.1cc</sub>: 7.52 Gy vs. 9.02 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.01; D<sub>0.5cc</sub>: 6.46 Gy vs. 7.42 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.01; D<sub>1cc</sub>: 5.91 Gy vs. 6.7 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.01; D<sub>2cc</sub>: 5.29 Gy vs. 5.97 Gy, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Bladder doses were higher in the combined packing technique (D<sub>0.1cc</sub>: 11.20 Gy vs. 10.76 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.18; D<sub>0.5cc</sub>: 9.64 Gy vs. 9.32 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.56; D<sub>1cc</sub>: 8.64 Gy vs. 8.36 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.55; D<sub>2cc</sub>: 7.56 vs. 7.33 Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.55).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined vaginal packing resulted in statistically significant reduction in rectal radiation dose compared with standard vaginal gauze packing in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervix cancer using tandem and ring applicators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"551-559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bb/1f/JCB-14-49845.PMC9924150.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2022.123975\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2022.123975","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Comparison of vaginal gauze packing technique with or without balloon in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of uterine cervical cancer: A crossover randomized controlled trial.
Purpose: To compare the rectal and bladder doses using two different vaginal packing techniques among uterine cervical cancer patients receiving high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT).
Material and methods: Forty-five patients with cervical cancer were randomized to receive two sessions of ICBT using tandem and ring applicator (Varian© ), following completion of pelvic external beam radiotherapy treatment. The procedure was performed with vaginal balloon plus gauze packing or vaginal gauze packing alone, each of which was used in one of two sessions. Sequence of the type of vaginal packing was chosen with computer-generated block randomization. A HDR dose of 8.5 Gy was prescribed to point A in all patients. Volumetric dose parameters, such as D0.1cc , D0.5cc , D1cc , and D2cc of the rectum and bladder were compared between the two techniques of vaginal packing.
Results: The mean age of patients was 51 years. Majority (88%) of patients had locally advanced stages of cancer at baseline (stage IIB or more). Rectal doses were significantly less in combined packing technique (D0.1cc : 7.52 Gy vs. 9.02 Gy, p = 0.01; D0.5cc : 6.46 Gy vs. 7.42 Gy, p < 0.01; D1cc : 5.91 Gy vs. 6.7 Gy, p < 0.01; D2cc : 5.29 Gy vs. 5.97 Gy, p < 0.01). Bladder doses were higher in the combined packing technique (D0.1cc : 11.20 Gy vs. 10.76 Gy, p = 0.18; D0.5cc : 9.64 Gy vs. 9.32 Gy, p = 0.56; D1cc : 8.64 Gy vs. 8.36 Gy, p = 0.55; D2cc : 7.56 vs. 7.33 Gy, p = 0.55).
Conclusions: Combined vaginal packing resulted in statistically significant reduction in rectal radiation dose compared with standard vaginal gauze packing in high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervix cancer using tandem and ring applicators.