Usage of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (postpartum-IUD) after an increase in the institutional delivery rate in India: time to re-visit the effect of timing of counselling on its acceptance.

Purpose: While increase in institutional deliveries brings an opportunity to counsel women for postpartum family planning (PPFP), its uptake remains low. Reasons for poor acceptance of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (postpartum-IUD), and its relation with the timing of counselling need to be investigated.

Methods: Women attending the antenatal clinic, reporting in labour, and within 48 h of delivery respectively were invited to participate. Eligible women were asked about awareness and choice for PPFP. After counselling, acceptance for PPFP was compared with the baseline. Acceptance and continuation of postpartum-IUD were compared between women counselled in the antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum periods.

Results: Only 23% of 360 women were aware of postpartum-IUD. After counselling, acceptance for PPFP increased from 14% to 97% and for postpartum-IUD, from 0.5% to 33.9%. Acceptance of postpartum-IUD among women counselled in the antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum period was 45%, 35% and 21.7% respectively. Acceptance was higher among the antenatal-counselling group than the postpartum-counselling group (OR 0.45; CI 0.22-0.94; p = 0.03).

Conclusion: Counselling, irrespective of its timing, improves acceptance for PPFP. Acceptance and continuation of postpartum-IUD are higher following counselling in antenatal period. All eligible women should be counselled irrespective of 'when' they approach the facility.