[DSM-5与ICD-11对老年人适应不良特征的整合:PID-5-BF+M的构效度]。

Q4 Nursing
Morag F Facon, Eva Dierckx, Sebastiaan P J van Alphen, Gina Rossi
{"title":"[DSM-5与ICD-11对老年人适应不良特征的整合:PID-5-BF+M的构效度]。","authors":"Morag F Facon,&nbsp;Eva Dierckx,&nbsp;Sebastiaan P J van Alphen,&nbsp;Gina Rossi","doi":"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2023.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form + Modified (PID-5-BF+M) is a self-report questionnaire measuring maladaptive personality traits, as defined by the dimensional classifications of personality disorders in DSM-5 Section 3 and ICD-11. The instrument combines both classifications to capture six personality domains and 18 underlying personality facets, operationalized by two items each. This study examined the construct validity of this questionnaire in older adults, by examining the factor structure and the reliability of the domains and facets. Additionally, the study investigated the relationship between maladaptive personality traits and resilience, as measured by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The PID-5-BF+M was administered to 251 older adults from the general population, 104 of the respondents also filled in the CD-RISC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hierarchical factor structure of the PID-5-BF+M was corroborated in in older adults. Additionally, the domain and facet scales were found to be internally consistent. The correlations with the CD-RISC showed logical associations. The domain of Negative Affectivity and the facets Emotional Lability, Anxiety and Irresponsibility were negatively associated with resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these results, this study supports the construct validity of the PID-5-BF+M in older adults. However, future research on the age-neutrality of the instrument is still needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":39945,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Integration of the DSM-5 and ICD-11 Maladaptive Traits in Older Adults: Construct Validity of the PID-5-BF+M].\",\"authors\":\"Morag F Facon,&nbsp;Eva Dierckx,&nbsp;Sebastiaan P J van Alphen,&nbsp;Gina Rossi\",\"doi\":\"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2023.01.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form + Modified (PID-5-BF+M) is a self-report questionnaire measuring maladaptive personality traits, as defined by the dimensional classifications of personality disorders in DSM-5 Section 3 and ICD-11. The instrument combines both classifications to capture six personality domains and 18 underlying personality facets, operationalized by two items each. This study examined the construct validity of this questionnaire in older adults, by examining the factor structure and the reliability of the domains and facets. Additionally, the study investigated the relationship between maladaptive personality traits and resilience, as measured by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The PID-5-BF+M was administered to 251 older adults from the general population, 104 of the respondents also filled in the CD-RISC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hierarchical factor structure of the PID-5-BF+M was corroborated in in older adults. Additionally, the domain and facet scales were found to be internally consistent. The correlations with the CD-RISC showed logical associations. The domain of Negative Affectivity and the facets Emotional Lability, Anxiety and Irresponsibility were negatively associated with resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these results, this study supports the construct validity of the PID-5-BF+M in older adults. However, future research on the age-neutrality of the instrument is still needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2023.01.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2023.01.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:DSM-5简表+修改人格量表(PID-5-BF+M)是根据DSM-5第3节和ICD-11中人格障碍维度分类定义的一种测量适应不良人格特征的自我报告问卷。该工具结合了这两种分类,以捕获六个人格领域和18个潜在的人格方面,每个方面由两个项目操作。本研究通过考察该问卷的因素结构和各领域、各方面的信度,检验了该问卷在老年人中的结构效度。此外,本研究还通过康诺-戴维森弹性量表(CD-RISC)调查了适应不良人格特征与弹性之间的关系。方法:对251名老年人进行PID-5-BF+M测试,其中104人同时填写CD-RISC。结果:证实了老年人PID-5-BF+M的分层因子结构。此外,发现区域和小面尺度内部一致。与CD-RISC的相关性显示出逻辑关联。消极情感领域、情绪不稳定、焦虑和不负责任与心理弹性呈负相关。结论:基于以上结果,本研究支持PID-5-BF+M在老年人中的结构效度。然而,对仪器的年龄中性的未来研究仍然需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Integration of the DSM-5 and ICD-11 Maladaptive Traits in Older Adults: Construct Validity of the PID-5-BF+M].

Background: The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form + Modified (PID-5-BF+M) is a self-report questionnaire measuring maladaptive personality traits, as defined by the dimensional classifications of personality disorders in DSM-5 Section 3 and ICD-11. The instrument combines both classifications to capture six personality domains and 18 underlying personality facets, operationalized by two items each. This study examined the construct validity of this questionnaire in older adults, by examining the factor structure and the reliability of the domains and facets. Additionally, the study investigated the relationship between maladaptive personality traits and resilience, as measured by the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC).

Method: The PID-5-BF+M was administered to 251 older adults from the general population, 104 of the respondents also filled in the CD-RISC.

Results: The hierarchical factor structure of the PID-5-BF+M was corroborated in in older adults. Additionally, the domain and facet scales were found to be internally consistent. The correlations with the CD-RISC showed logical associations. The domain of Negative Affectivity and the facets Emotional Lability, Anxiety and Irresponsibility were negatively associated with resilience.

Conclusion: Based on these results, this study supports the construct validity of the PID-5-BF+M in older adults. However, future research on the age-neutrality of the instrument is still needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信