钙通道的蛋白水解调节-避免争议。

Bruce Alberts, Roger J Colbran, Annette C Dolphin, Geoffrey S Pitt, Thomas C Südhof
{"title":"钙通道的蛋白水解调节-避免争议。","authors":"Bruce Alberts,&nbsp;Roger J Colbran,&nbsp;Annette C Dolphin,&nbsp;Geoffrey S Pitt,&nbsp;Thomas C Südhof","doi":"10.12703/r-01-000006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The publication of papers containing data obtained with suboptimal rigor in the experimental design and choice of key reagents, such as antibodies, can result in a lack of reproducibility and generate controversy that can both needlessly divert resources and, in some cases, damage public perception of the scientific enterprise. This exemplary paper by Buonarati <i>et al.</i> (2018)<sup>1</sup> shows how a previously published, potentially important paper on calcium channel regulation falls short of the necessary mark, and aims to resolve the resulting controversy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73016,"journal":{"name":"Faculty reviews","volume":"11 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958896/pdf/facrev-11-05.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proteolytic regulation of calcium channels - avoiding controversy.\",\"authors\":\"Bruce Alberts,&nbsp;Roger J Colbran,&nbsp;Annette C Dolphin,&nbsp;Geoffrey S Pitt,&nbsp;Thomas C Südhof\",\"doi\":\"10.12703/r-01-000006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The publication of papers containing data obtained with suboptimal rigor in the experimental design and choice of key reagents, such as antibodies, can result in a lack of reproducibility and generate controversy that can both needlessly divert resources and, in some cases, damage public perception of the scientific enterprise. This exemplary paper by Buonarati <i>et al.</i> (2018)<sup>1</sup> shows how a previously published, potentially important paper on calcium channel regulation falls short of the necessary mark, and aims to resolve the resulting controversy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Faculty reviews\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958896/pdf/facrev-11-05.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Faculty reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12703/r-01-000006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Faculty reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12703/r-01-000006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发表包含在实验设计和关键试剂(如抗体)选择上不理想的严格性获得的数据的论文,可能导致缺乏可重复性,并产生争议,这既可能不必要地转移资源,在某些情况下,还会损害公众对科学事业的看法。这篇由Buonarati等人(2018)撰写的示范性论文1展示了之前发表的一篇关于钙通道调节的潜在重要论文如何达不到必要的标准,并旨在解决由此产生的争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proteolytic regulation of calcium channels - avoiding controversy.

The publication of papers containing data obtained with suboptimal rigor in the experimental design and choice of key reagents, such as antibodies, can result in a lack of reproducibility and generate controversy that can both needlessly divert resources and, in some cases, damage public perception of the scientific enterprise. This exemplary paper by Buonarati et al. (2018)1 shows how a previously published, potentially important paper on calcium channel regulation falls short of the necessary mark, and aims to resolve the resulting controversy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信