无流行病学调查经验牙医龋齿校正的纵向研究。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Mariana Nabarrette, Patrícia Rafaela Dos Santos, Andréa Videira Assaf, Glaucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano, Marcelo de Castro Meneghim, Silvia Amélia Scudeler Vedovello, Karine Laura Cortellazzi
{"title":"无流行病学调查经验牙医龋齿校正的纵向研究。","authors":"Mariana Nabarrette,&nbsp;Patrícia Rafaela Dos Santos,&nbsp;Andréa Videira Assaf,&nbsp;Glaucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano,&nbsp;Marcelo de Castro Meneghim,&nbsp;Silvia Amélia Scudeler Vedovello,&nbsp;Karine Laura Cortellazzi","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to make a longitudinal analysis of interexaminer calibration reproducibility in diagnosing dental caries in posterior teeth, by examiners without previous experience in epidemiological studies. A group of 11 inexperienced examiners underwent theoretical-practical training and calibration assessments, assisted by a standard examiner. An examiner who did not participate directly in the research selected 5-year-old children with and without caries. The D3 diagnostic threshold was used to evaluate dental caries, based on the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. The initial calibration (baseline) was performed after the theoretical-practical training session, and consisted of examining 20 children; the second calibration occurred three months later, and involved evaluating another 18 children. The interexaminer agreement was obtained by kappa statistics, and by overall percentage agreement. The paired t-test was applied to compare the values for kappa means and overall percentage agreement between the time points studied. At baseline, the values for kappa (> 0.81) and overall percentage agreement (> 95.63%) were considered high. At the 3-month calibration assessment, all the examiners showed some decrease in both kappa (p < 0.0001) and overall percentage agreement (p = 0.0102). The calibration process currently proposed by the WHO is effective. However, reproducibility was not maintained over time for inexperienced examiners evaluating the posterior teeth of 5-year-old children, under epidemiological conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48942,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Oral Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal study for dental caries calibration of dentists unexperienced in epidemiological surveys.\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Nabarrette,&nbsp;Patrícia Rafaela Dos Santos,&nbsp;Andréa Videira Assaf,&nbsp;Glaucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano,&nbsp;Marcelo de Castro Meneghim,&nbsp;Silvia Amélia Scudeler Vedovello,&nbsp;Karine Laura Cortellazzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to make a longitudinal analysis of interexaminer calibration reproducibility in diagnosing dental caries in posterior teeth, by examiners without previous experience in epidemiological studies. A group of 11 inexperienced examiners underwent theoretical-practical training and calibration assessments, assisted by a standard examiner. An examiner who did not participate directly in the research selected 5-year-old children with and without caries. The D3 diagnostic threshold was used to evaluate dental caries, based on the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. The initial calibration (baseline) was performed after the theoretical-practical training session, and consisted of examining 20 children; the second calibration occurred three months later, and involved evaluating another 18 children. The interexaminer agreement was obtained by kappa statistics, and by overall percentage agreement. The paired t-test was applied to compare the values for kappa means and overall percentage agreement between the time points studied. At baseline, the values for kappa (> 0.81) and overall percentage agreement (> 95.63%) were considered high. At the 3-month calibration assessment, all the examiners showed some decrease in both kappa (p < 0.0001) and overall percentage agreement (p = 0.0102). The calibration process currently proposed by the WHO is effective. However, reproducibility was not maintained over time for inexperienced examiners evaluating the posterior teeth of 5-year-old children, under epidemiological conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Oral Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Oral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在对没有流行病学研究经验的检验员在诊断后牙龋齿时的校准可重复性进行纵向分析。由11名没有经验的审查员组成的小组在一名标准审查员的协助下接受了理论实践培训和校准评估。一位没有直接参与研究的考官选择了有和没有龋齿的5岁儿童。根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的标准,使用D3诊断阈值来评估龋齿。初始校准(基线)在理论-实践培训课程结束后进行,包括检查20名儿童;第二次校准发生在三个月后,涉及评估另外18名儿童。通过kappa统计和总体百分比一致获得审查员之间的一致。配对t检验用于比较kappa平均值和研究时间点之间总体百分比一致性的值。在基线时,kappa值(> 0.81)和总体百分比一致性(> 95.63%)被认为是高的。在3个月的校准评估中,所有的审查员都显示kappa (p < 0.0001)和总体百分比一致性(p = 0.0102)有所下降。世卫组织目前提出的校准过程是有效的。然而,随着时间的推移,在流行病学条件下,没有经验的检查员评估5岁儿童的后牙时,不能保持再现性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Longitudinal study for dental caries calibration of dentists unexperienced in epidemiological surveys.

This study aimed to make a longitudinal analysis of interexaminer calibration reproducibility in diagnosing dental caries in posterior teeth, by examiners without previous experience in epidemiological studies. A group of 11 inexperienced examiners underwent theoretical-practical training and calibration assessments, assisted by a standard examiner. An examiner who did not participate directly in the research selected 5-year-old children with and without caries. The D3 diagnostic threshold was used to evaluate dental caries, based on the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. The initial calibration (baseline) was performed after the theoretical-practical training session, and consisted of examining 20 children; the second calibration occurred three months later, and involved evaluating another 18 children. The interexaminer agreement was obtained by kappa statistics, and by overall percentage agreement. The paired t-test was applied to compare the values for kappa means and overall percentage agreement between the time points studied. At baseline, the values for kappa (> 0.81) and overall percentage agreement (> 95.63%) were considered high. At the 3-month calibration assessment, all the examiners showed some decrease in both kappa (p < 0.0001) and overall percentage agreement (p = 0.0102). The calibration process currently proposed by the WHO is effective. However, reproducibility was not maintained over time for inexperienced examiners evaluating the posterior teeth of 5-year-old children, under epidemiological conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Oral Research
Brazilian Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信