理想伴侣偏好的个体差异在 13 年间的稳定性和变化。

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Julie C Driebe, Julia Stern, Lars Penke, Tanja M Gerlach
{"title":"理想伴侣偏好的个体差异在 13 年间的稳定性和变化。","authors":"Julie C Driebe, Julia Stern, Lars Penke, Tanja M Gerlach","doi":"10.1177/01461672231164757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ideal partner preferences for traits in a partner are said to be stable cognitive constructs. However, longitudinal studies investigating the same participants' ideals repeatedly have so far been limited to relatively short retest intervals of a maximum of 3 years. Here, we investigate the stability and change of ideals across 13 years and participants' insight into how ideals have changed. A total of 204 participants (<i>M</i> = 46.2 years, <i>SD</i> = 7.4, 104 women) reported their ideals at two time points. We found a mean rank-order stability of <i>r</i> = .42 and an overall profile stability of <i>r</i> = .73 (distinctive <i>r</i> = .53). Some ideals changed over time, for example, increased for status-resources in relation to age and parenthood. We found some but varying insight into how ideals had changed (mean <i>r</i> = .20). Results support the idea of ideals being stable cognitive constructs but suggest some variability related to the demands of different life stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"1263-1279"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability and Change of Individual Differences in Ideal Partner Preferences Over 13 Years.\",\"authors\":\"Julie C Driebe, Julia Stern, Lars Penke, Tanja M Gerlach\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01461672231164757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ideal partner preferences for traits in a partner are said to be stable cognitive constructs. However, longitudinal studies investigating the same participants' ideals repeatedly have so far been limited to relatively short retest intervals of a maximum of 3 years. Here, we investigate the stability and change of ideals across 13 years and participants' insight into how ideals have changed. A total of 204 participants (<i>M</i> = 46.2 years, <i>SD</i> = 7.4, 104 women) reported their ideals at two time points. We found a mean rank-order stability of <i>r</i> = .42 and an overall profile stability of <i>r</i> = .73 (distinctive <i>r</i> = .53). Some ideals changed over time, for example, increased for status-resources in relation to age and parenthood. We found some but varying insight into how ideals had changed (mean <i>r</i> = .20). Results support the idea of ideals being stable cognitive constructs but suggest some variability related to the demands of different life stages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1263-1279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193321/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231164757\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231164757","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据说,理想伴侣对伴侣特质的偏好是一种稳定的认知结构。然而,迄今为止,对同一参与者的理想进行反复调查的纵向研究仅限于相对较短的重测间隔,最长不超过 3 年。在此,我们调查了 13 年间理想的稳定性和变化,以及参与者对理想如何变化的洞察力。共有 204 名参与者(男 = 46.2 岁,女 = 7.4,104 名女性)在两个时间点报告了他们的理想。我们发现,平均排序稳定性 r = 0.42,总体特征稳定性 r = 0.73(独特性 r = 0.53)。随着时间的推移,一些理想发生了变化,例如,与年龄和养育子女有关的地位-资源方面的理想有所增加。我们发现了一些关于理想如何变化的洞察力,但各不相同(平均 r = .20)。调查结果表明,理想是一种稳定的认知结构,但也存在一些与不同生活阶段的需求有关的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stability and Change of Individual Differences in Ideal Partner Preferences Over 13 Years.

Ideal partner preferences for traits in a partner are said to be stable cognitive constructs. However, longitudinal studies investigating the same participants' ideals repeatedly have so far been limited to relatively short retest intervals of a maximum of 3 years. Here, we investigate the stability and change of ideals across 13 years and participants' insight into how ideals have changed. A total of 204 participants (M = 46.2 years, SD = 7.4, 104 women) reported their ideals at two time points. We found a mean rank-order stability of r = .42 and an overall profile stability of r = .73 (distinctive r = .53). Some ideals changed over time, for example, increased for status-resources in relation to age and parenthood. We found some but varying insight into how ideals had changed (mean r = .20). Results support the idea of ideals being stable cognitive constructs but suggest some variability related to the demands of different life stages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信