使用技术接受模型的药房文档平台的纵向比较:阿片类药物风险筛查的经验。

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2023-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-03 DOI:10.1177/87551225221128207
Oliver C Frenzel, Mark Strand, Allison Welsh, Heidi Eukel, Elizabeth Skoy, Jayme Steig, Amy Werremeyer
{"title":"使用技术接受模型的药房文档平台的纵向比较:阿片类药物风险筛查的经验。","authors":"Oliver C Frenzel,&nbsp;Mark Strand,&nbsp;Allison Welsh,&nbsp;Heidi Eukel,&nbsp;Elizabeth Skoy,&nbsp;Jayme Steig,&nbsp;Amy Werremeyer","doi":"10.1177/87551225221128207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Pharmacy practice continues to expand in scope, and technology platforms to assist with meeting the standards for documentation of billable services are needed. The ONE Program (Opioid and Naloxone Education) is an initiative centered on the community pharmacy focused on opioid risk screening for patients receiving opioid prescriptions. <b>Objective:</b> Opioid risk screening results and pharmacist interventions were documented using first REDCap and later the DocStation platforms. This study compared pharmacy staff experience with these 2 platforms. <b>Methods:</b> A survey using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was designed to compare usability, ease of use, social influence, and facilitating conditions. <b>Results:</b> Analyses using descriptive statistics and open-ended responses showed similar results for each platform; however, pharmacy staff indicated that REDCap required less time when entering information, whereas the DocStation platform offered elevated pharmacy practice service opportunities, management support, and available informational technology support services. <b>Conclusion:</b> Health care technology continues to advance in meeting the needs of expanded service provision through pharmacy. This longitudinal study shows the value of the TAM framework in identifying efficiencies and deficiencies of health care technology systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899959/pdf/10.1177_87551225221128207.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Longitudinal Comparison of Pharmacy Documentation Platforms Using the Technology Acceptance Model: Experiences With Opioid Risk Screening.\",\"authors\":\"Oliver C Frenzel,&nbsp;Mark Strand,&nbsp;Allison Welsh,&nbsp;Heidi Eukel,&nbsp;Elizabeth Skoy,&nbsp;Jayme Steig,&nbsp;Amy Werremeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87551225221128207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Pharmacy practice continues to expand in scope, and technology platforms to assist with meeting the standards for documentation of billable services are needed. The ONE Program (Opioid and Naloxone Education) is an initiative centered on the community pharmacy focused on opioid risk screening for patients receiving opioid prescriptions. <b>Objective:</b> Opioid risk screening results and pharmacist interventions were documented using first REDCap and later the DocStation platforms. This study compared pharmacy staff experience with these 2 platforms. <b>Methods:</b> A survey using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was designed to compare usability, ease of use, social influence, and facilitating conditions. <b>Results:</b> Analyses using descriptive statistics and open-ended responses showed similar results for each platform; however, pharmacy staff indicated that REDCap required less time when entering information, whereas the DocStation platform offered elevated pharmacy practice service opportunities, management support, and available informational technology support services. <b>Conclusion:</b> Health care technology continues to advance in meeting the needs of expanded service provision through pharmacy. This longitudinal study shows the value of the TAM framework in identifying efficiencies and deficiencies of health care technology systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899959/pdf/10.1177_87551225221128207.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225221128207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225221128207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药房业务的范围不断扩大,需要技术平台来帮助满足计费服务的文档标准。ONE计划(阿片类药物和纳洛酮教育)是一项以社区药房为中心的倡议,重点是对接受阿片类处方的患者进行阿片类风险筛查。目的:使用第一个REDCap和后来的DocStation平台记录阿片类药物风险筛查结果和药剂师干预措施。本研究将药房工作人员的经验与这两个平台进行了比较。方法:使用技术接受模型(TAM)进行调查,比较可用性、易用性、社会影响和便利条件。结果:使用描述性统计和开放式回答的分析显示,每个平台的结果相似;然而,药房工作人员表示,REDCap在输入信息时所需的时间较少,而DocStation平台提供了更多的药房实践服务机会、管理支持和可用的信息技术支持服务。结论:医疗保健技术在满足通过药房扩大服务提供的需求方面不断进步。这项纵向研究显示了TAM框架在识别医疗保健技术系统的效率和不足方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Longitudinal Comparison of Pharmacy Documentation Platforms Using the Technology Acceptance Model: Experiences With Opioid Risk Screening.

Background: Pharmacy practice continues to expand in scope, and technology platforms to assist with meeting the standards for documentation of billable services are needed. The ONE Program (Opioid and Naloxone Education) is an initiative centered on the community pharmacy focused on opioid risk screening for patients receiving opioid prescriptions. Objective: Opioid risk screening results and pharmacist interventions were documented using first REDCap and later the DocStation platforms. This study compared pharmacy staff experience with these 2 platforms. Methods: A survey using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was designed to compare usability, ease of use, social influence, and facilitating conditions. Results: Analyses using descriptive statistics and open-ended responses showed similar results for each platform; however, pharmacy staff indicated that REDCap required less time when entering information, whereas the DocStation platform offered elevated pharmacy practice service opportunities, management support, and available informational technology support services. Conclusion: Health care technology continues to advance in meeting the needs of expanded service provision through pharmacy. This longitudinal study shows the value of the TAM framework in identifying efficiencies and deficiencies of health care technology systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信