建立一个支持非正式照护者的框架:来自瑞典、爱尔兰和美国的经验。

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Suzanne Cahill, Therése Bielsten, Steven H Zarit
{"title":"建立一个支持非正式照护者的框架:来自瑞典、爱尔兰和美国的经验。","authors":"Suzanne Cahill,&nbsp;Therése Bielsten,&nbsp;Steven H Zarit","doi":"10.1177/01640275221113356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policies and services to support informal caregivers vary considerably across countries. This paper examines the role of caregivers and how perspectives on that role may influence the availability of benefits and services in three countries that differ considerably in their care systems - Sweden, Ireland and the United States. We developed a nine-dimensional framework for examining differences, including policies and how the role of caregiver is conceptualized. We found differences in the three countries in how services are organized, which reflected assumptions about the caregiver role. There were also similarities in the three countries. Caregivers held an ambiguous position within each social system and there was little concern for equity in the delivery of support services. Increased clarity about the role of caregivers may facilitate development of policies that more effectively meet their varied needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47983,"journal":{"name":"Research on Aging","volume":"45 3-4","pages":"385-395"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Framework for the Support of Informal Caregivers: Experiences from Sweden, Ireland, and the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne Cahill,&nbsp;Therése Bielsten,&nbsp;Steven H Zarit\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01640275221113356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Policies and services to support informal caregivers vary considerably across countries. This paper examines the role of caregivers and how perspectives on that role may influence the availability of benefits and services in three countries that differ considerably in their care systems - Sweden, Ireland and the United States. We developed a nine-dimensional framework for examining differences, including policies and how the role of caregiver is conceptualized. We found differences in the three countries in how services are organized, which reflected assumptions about the caregiver role. There were also similarities in the three countries. Caregivers held an ambiguous position within each social system and there was little concern for equity in the delivery of support services. Increased clarity about the role of caregivers may facilitate development of policies that more effectively meet their varied needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research on Aging\",\"volume\":\"45 3-4\",\"pages\":\"385-395\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research on Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275221113356\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Aging","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275221113356","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

各国支持非正规照护者的政策和服务差别很大。本文考察了照顾者的角色,以及对这一角色的看法如何影响三个国家(瑞典、爱尔兰和美国)的福利和服务的可获得性,这三个国家的护理系统差异很大。我们开发了一个九维框架来检查差异,包括政策和如何概念化照顾者的角色。我们发现三个国家在服务组织方式上存在差异,这反映了对护理人员角色的假设。这三个国家也有相似之处。照顾者在每个社会制度中都有一个模棱两可的地位,在提供支助服务方面很少关心公平问题。更加明确照顾者的作用可能有助于制定更有效地满足其各种需求的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a Framework for the Support of Informal Caregivers: Experiences from Sweden, Ireland, and the United States.

Policies and services to support informal caregivers vary considerably across countries. This paper examines the role of caregivers and how perspectives on that role may influence the availability of benefits and services in three countries that differ considerably in their care systems - Sweden, Ireland and the United States. We developed a nine-dimensional framework for examining differences, including policies and how the role of caregiver is conceptualized. We found differences in the three countries in how services are organized, which reflected assumptions about the caregiver role. There were also similarities in the three countries. Caregivers held an ambiguous position within each social system and there was little concern for equity in the delivery of support services. Increased clarity about the role of caregivers may facilitate development of policies that more effectively meet their varied needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research on Aging
Research on Aging GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Research on Aging is an interdisciplinary journal designed to reflect the expanding role of research in the field of social gerontology. Research on Aging exists to provide for publication of research in the broad range of disciplines concerned with aging. Scholars from the disciplines of sociology, geriatrics, history, psychology, anthropology, public health, economics, political science, criminal justice, and social work are encouraged to contribute articles to the journal. Emphasis will be on materials of broad scope and cross-disciplinary interest. Assessment of the current state of knowledge is as important as provision of an outlet for new knowledge, so critical and review articles are welcomed. Systematic attention to particular topics will also be featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信