成人克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎患者的手术治疗:来自巴西克罗恩病和结肠炎组织(gediib)的共识。

Q2 Medicine
Gilmara Pandolfo Zabot, Ornella Sari Cassol, Abel Botelho Quaresma, Francisco de Assis Gonçalves Filho, Júlio Pinheiro Baima, Marcello Imbrizi, Alexandre de Sá Rolim, Alexandre Medeiros do Carmo, Antonio Jose Tiburcio Alves Junior, Carlos Henrique Marques Dos Santos, Carlos Walter Sobrado Junior, Eron Fábio Miranda, Idblan Carvalho de Albuquerque, Mardem Machado de Souza, Roberto Luiz Kaiser Junior, Rogerio Serafim Parra, Paulo Gustavo Kotze, Rogério Saad-Hossne
{"title":"成人克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎患者的手术治疗:来自巴西克罗恩病和结肠炎组织(gediib)的共识。","authors":"Gilmara Pandolfo Zabot,&nbsp;Ornella Sari Cassol,&nbsp;Abel Botelho Quaresma,&nbsp;Francisco de Assis Gonçalves Filho,&nbsp;Júlio Pinheiro Baima,&nbsp;Marcello Imbrizi,&nbsp;Alexandre de Sá Rolim,&nbsp;Alexandre Medeiros do Carmo,&nbsp;Antonio Jose Tiburcio Alves Junior,&nbsp;Carlos Henrique Marques Dos Santos,&nbsp;Carlos Walter Sobrado Junior,&nbsp;Eron Fábio Miranda,&nbsp;Idblan Carvalho de Albuquerque,&nbsp;Mardem Machado de Souza,&nbsp;Roberto Luiz Kaiser Junior,&nbsp;Rogerio Serafim Parra,&nbsp;Paulo Gustavo Kotze,&nbsp;Rogério Saad-Hossne","doi":"10.1590/S0004-2803.2022005S1-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite optimized medical therapy, contemporary risk of surgery in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) after 10 years of diagnosis is 9.2% in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 26.2% in Crohn's disease, (CD) in the biological era.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This consensus aims to detail guidance to the most appropriate surgical procedures in different IBD scenarios. In addition, it details surgical indications and perioperative management of adult patients with CD and UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our consensus was developed by colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists representing the Brazilian Study Group of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (GEDIIB), with the Rapid Review methodology being conducted to support the recommendations/statements. Surgical recommendations were structured and mapped according to the disease phenotypes, surgical indications, and techniques. After structuring the recommendations/statements, the modified Delphi Panel methodology was used to conduct the voting by experts in IBD surgery and gastroenterology. This consisted of three rounds: two using a personalized and anonymous online voting platform and one face-to-face presential meeting. Whenever participants did not agree with specific statements or recommendations, an option to outline possible reasons was offered to enable free-text responses and provide the opportunity for the experts to elaborate or explain disagreement. The consensus of recommendations/statements in each round was considered to have been reached if there was ≥80% agreement.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusion: </strong>This consensus addressed the most relevant information to guide the decision-making process for adequate surgical management of CD and UC. It synthesizes recommendations developed from evidence-based statements and state-of-art knowledge. Surgical recommendations were structured and mapped according to the different disease phenotypes, indications for surgery and perioperative management. Specific focus of our consensus was given to elective and emergency surgical procedures, determining when to indicate surgery and which procedures may be the more appropriate. The consensus is targeted to gastroenterologists and surgeons interested in the treatment and management of adult patients with CD or UC and supports decision-making of healthcare payors, institutional leaders, and/or administrators.</p>","PeriodicalId":35671,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF ADULT CROHN'S DISEASE AND ULCERATIVE COLITIS PATIENTS: A CONSENSUS FROM THE BRAZILIAN ORGANIZATION OF CROHN'S DISEASE AND COLITIS (GEDIIB).\",\"authors\":\"Gilmara Pandolfo Zabot,&nbsp;Ornella Sari Cassol,&nbsp;Abel Botelho Quaresma,&nbsp;Francisco de Assis Gonçalves Filho,&nbsp;Júlio Pinheiro Baima,&nbsp;Marcello Imbrizi,&nbsp;Alexandre de Sá Rolim,&nbsp;Alexandre Medeiros do Carmo,&nbsp;Antonio Jose Tiburcio Alves Junior,&nbsp;Carlos Henrique Marques Dos Santos,&nbsp;Carlos Walter Sobrado Junior,&nbsp;Eron Fábio Miranda,&nbsp;Idblan Carvalho de Albuquerque,&nbsp;Mardem Machado de Souza,&nbsp;Roberto Luiz Kaiser Junior,&nbsp;Rogerio Serafim Parra,&nbsp;Paulo Gustavo Kotze,&nbsp;Rogério Saad-Hossne\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S0004-2803.2022005S1-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite optimized medical therapy, contemporary risk of surgery in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) after 10 years of diagnosis is 9.2% in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 26.2% in Crohn's disease, (CD) in the biological era.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This consensus aims to detail guidance to the most appropriate surgical procedures in different IBD scenarios. In addition, it details surgical indications and perioperative management of adult patients with CD and UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our consensus was developed by colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists representing the Brazilian Study Group of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (GEDIIB), with the Rapid Review methodology being conducted to support the recommendations/statements. Surgical recommendations were structured and mapped according to the disease phenotypes, surgical indications, and techniques. After structuring the recommendations/statements, the modified Delphi Panel methodology was used to conduct the voting by experts in IBD surgery and gastroenterology. This consisted of three rounds: two using a personalized and anonymous online voting platform and one face-to-face presential meeting. Whenever participants did not agree with specific statements or recommendations, an option to outline possible reasons was offered to enable free-text responses and provide the opportunity for the experts to elaborate or explain disagreement. The consensus of recommendations/statements in each round was considered to have been reached if there was ≥80% agreement.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusion: </strong>This consensus addressed the most relevant information to guide the decision-making process for adequate surgical management of CD and UC. It synthesizes recommendations developed from evidence-based statements and state-of-art knowledge. Surgical recommendations were structured and mapped according to the different disease phenotypes, indications for surgery and perioperative management. Specific focus of our consensus was given to elective and emergency surgical procedures, determining when to indicate surgery and which procedures may be the more appropriate. The consensus is targeted to gastroenterologists and surgeons interested in the treatment and management of adult patients with CD or UC and supports decision-making of healthcare payors, institutional leaders, and/or administrators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.2022005S1-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de Gastroenterologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.2022005S1-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:尽管优化了药物治疗,但在生物时代,溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者10年后炎症性肠病(IBD)的当代手术风险为9.2%,克罗恩病(CD)患者为26.2%。目的:本共识旨在详细指导不同IBD情况下最合适的外科手术。此外,还详细介绍了成人CD和UC患者的手术指征和围手术期处理。方法:我们的共识是由代表巴西炎症性肠病研究组(GEDIIB)的结直肠外科医生和胃肠病学家形成的,并采用快速审查方法来支持建议/声明。手术建议是根据疾病表型、手术指征和技术来构建和绘制的。在构建推荐/陈述后,由IBD外科和胃肠病学专家使用改进的德尔菲小组方法进行投票。这包括三轮投票:两轮使用个性化和匿名的在线投票平台,另一轮是面对面的会议。每当与会者不同意具体的陈述或建议时,就提供一个概述可能原因的选项,以便作出自由文本的答复,并为专家提供阐述或解释不同意见的机会。如果每一轮的建议/陈述的一致性≥80%,则认为已达成一致。结果和结论:该共识解决了最相关的信息,以指导CD和UC的适当外科治疗决策过程。它综合了基于证据的陈述和最新知识的建议。根据不同的疾病表型、手术指征和围手术期管理,构建和绘制手术建议。我们共识的具体重点是选择性和紧急外科手术,确定何时指示手术以及哪种手术可能更合适。该共识针对的是对成年乳糜泻或UC患者的治疗和管理感兴趣的胃肠病学家和外科医生,并支持医疗支付者、机构领导和/或管理人员的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF ADULT CROHN'S DISEASE AND ULCERATIVE COLITIS PATIENTS: A CONSENSUS FROM THE BRAZILIAN ORGANIZATION OF CROHN'S DISEASE AND COLITIS (GEDIIB).

Background: Despite optimized medical therapy, contemporary risk of surgery in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) after 10 years of diagnosis is 9.2% in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 26.2% in Crohn's disease, (CD) in the biological era.

Objective: This consensus aims to detail guidance to the most appropriate surgical procedures in different IBD scenarios. In addition, it details surgical indications and perioperative management of adult patients with CD and UC.

Methods: Our consensus was developed by colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists representing the Brazilian Study Group of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (GEDIIB), with the Rapid Review methodology being conducted to support the recommendations/statements. Surgical recommendations were structured and mapped according to the disease phenotypes, surgical indications, and techniques. After structuring the recommendations/statements, the modified Delphi Panel methodology was used to conduct the voting by experts in IBD surgery and gastroenterology. This consisted of three rounds: two using a personalized and anonymous online voting platform and one face-to-face presential meeting. Whenever participants did not agree with specific statements or recommendations, an option to outline possible reasons was offered to enable free-text responses and provide the opportunity for the experts to elaborate or explain disagreement. The consensus of recommendations/statements in each round was considered to have been reached if there was ≥80% agreement.

Results and conclusion: This consensus addressed the most relevant information to guide the decision-making process for adequate surgical management of CD and UC. It synthesizes recommendations developed from evidence-based statements and state-of-art knowledge. Surgical recommendations were structured and mapped according to the different disease phenotypes, indications for surgery and perioperative management. Specific focus of our consensus was given to elective and emergency surgical procedures, determining when to indicate surgery and which procedures may be the more appropriate. The consensus is targeted to gastroenterologists and surgeons interested in the treatment and management of adult patients with CD or UC and supports decision-making of healthcare payors, institutional leaders, and/or administrators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia
Arquivos de Gastroenterologia Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Arquivos de Gastroenterologia (Archives of Gastroenterology), a quarterly journal, is the Official Publication of the Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia IBEPEGE (Brazilian Institute for Studies and Research in Gastroenterology), Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva - CBCD (Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery) and of the Sociedade Brasileira de Motilidade Digestiva - SBMD (Brazilian Digestive Motility Society). It is dedicated to the publishing of scientific papers by national and foreign researchers who are in agreement with the aim of the journal as well as with its editorial policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信