海绵体旋转加白膜应用治疗阴茎弯曲的疗效。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ANDROLOGY
Vladimir Vorobev, Vladimir Beloborodov, Andrey Sherbatykh, Alexey Kalyagin, Olga Baklanova, Sergei Popov, Stepan Sidorov
{"title":"海绵体旋转加白膜应用治疗阴茎弯曲的疗效。","authors":"Vladimir Vorobev,&nbsp;Vladimir Beloborodov,&nbsp;Andrey Sherbatykh,&nbsp;Alexey Kalyagin,&nbsp;Olga Baklanova,&nbsp;Sergei Popov,&nbsp;Stepan Sidorov","doi":"10.1186/s12610-023-00186-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are several approaches to the surgical treatment of the penile curvature conditionally divided into three large groups: tunica albuginea plication (TAP), corpus cavernosum rotation (CR), and transplantation of various materials. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of TAP and CR techniques in the treatment of penile curvature. There was a prospective randomized study of the effectiveness of surgical treatment of patients with an established diagnosis of the penile curvature from 2017 to 2020 in Irkutsk, Russian Federation. The final analysis of the results included 22 cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of the comparative intergroup effectiveness of the treatment performed based on the criteria established in the study showed good treatment results in 8 (88.8%) patients in the CR group and 9 (69.2%) patients in the TAP group (p = 0.577). The other patients obtained satisfactory results. There were no negative outcomes. Simple logistic regression analysis showed that the preoperative flexion angle > 60 degrees (OR 2.7; 95% CI 0.12; 5.28; p = 0.040) was significant in predicting the complaints of penile shortening during TAP. Both methods are safe, effective, and bring minimal risk of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thus, the effectiveness of both treatment methods is comparable. However, TAP surgery is not recommended for patients with an initial curvature of more than 60 degrees.</p>","PeriodicalId":8730,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Clinical Andrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061953/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of penile curvature treatment by cavernous body rotation and plication of the tunica albuginea.\",\"authors\":\"Vladimir Vorobev,&nbsp;Vladimir Beloborodov,&nbsp;Andrey Sherbatykh,&nbsp;Alexey Kalyagin,&nbsp;Olga Baklanova,&nbsp;Sergei Popov,&nbsp;Stepan Sidorov\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12610-023-00186-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are several approaches to the surgical treatment of the penile curvature conditionally divided into three large groups: tunica albuginea plication (TAP), corpus cavernosum rotation (CR), and transplantation of various materials. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of TAP and CR techniques in the treatment of penile curvature. There was a prospective randomized study of the effectiveness of surgical treatment of patients with an established diagnosis of the penile curvature from 2017 to 2020 in Irkutsk, Russian Federation. The final analysis of the results included 22 cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis of the comparative intergroup effectiveness of the treatment performed based on the criteria established in the study showed good treatment results in 8 (88.8%) patients in the CR group and 9 (69.2%) patients in the TAP group (p = 0.577). The other patients obtained satisfactory results. There were no negative outcomes. Simple logistic regression analysis showed that the preoperative flexion angle > 60 degrees (OR 2.7; 95% CI 0.12; 5.28; p = 0.040) was significant in predicting the complaints of penile shortening during TAP. Both methods are safe, effective, and bring minimal risk of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thus, the effectiveness of both treatment methods is comparable. However, TAP surgery is not recommended for patients with an initial curvature of more than 60 degrees.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic and Clinical Andrology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061953/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic and Clinical Andrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-023-00186-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Clinical Andrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-023-00186-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:有几种手术治疗阴茎弯曲的方法,有条件地分为三大类:白膜应用(TAP)、海绵体旋转(CR)和各种材料移植。本研究的目的是比较TAP和CR技术治疗阴茎弯曲的有效性。2017年至2020年,在俄罗斯伊尔库茨克进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,研究了阴茎弯曲确诊患者手术治疗的有效性。最终分析结果包括22例。结果:根据本研究建立的治疗标准进行组间疗效比较分析,CR组8例(88.8%)患者治疗效果良好,TAP组9例(69.2%)患者治疗效果良好(p = 0.577)。其余患者均获得满意效果。没有负面结果。简单logistic回归分析显示术前屈曲角度> 60度(OR 2.7;95% ci 0.12;5.28;p = 0.040)在预测TAP期间阴茎缩短的抱怨方面具有显著意义。这两种方法都是安全、有效的,并发症的风险最小。结论:两种治疗方法的疗效具有可比性。然而,对于初始曲率超过60度的患者,不建议进行TAP手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effectiveness of penile curvature treatment by cavernous body rotation and plication of the tunica albuginea.

The effectiveness of penile curvature treatment by cavernous body rotation and plication of the tunica albuginea.

Background: There are several approaches to the surgical treatment of the penile curvature conditionally divided into three large groups: tunica albuginea plication (TAP), corpus cavernosum rotation (CR), and transplantation of various materials. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of TAP and CR techniques in the treatment of penile curvature. There was a prospective randomized study of the effectiveness of surgical treatment of patients with an established diagnosis of the penile curvature from 2017 to 2020 in Irkutsk, Russian Federation. The final analysis of the results included 22 cases.

Results: The analysis of the comparative intergroup effectiveness of the treatment performed based on the criteria established in the study showed good treatment results in 8 (88.8%) patients in the CR group and 9 (69.2%) patients in the TAP group (p = 0.577). The other patients obtained satisfactory results. There were no negative outcomes. Simple logistic regression analysis showed that the preoperative flexion angle > 60 degrees (OR 2.7; 95% CI 0.12; 5.28; p = 0.040) was significant in predicting the complaints of penile shortening during TAP. Both methods are safe, effective, and bring minimal risk of complications.

Conclusion: Thus, the effectiveness of both treatment methods is comparable. However, TAP surgery is not recommended for patients with an initial curvature of more than 60 degrees.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Basic and Clinical Andrology
Basic and Clinical Andrology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Basic and Clinical Andrology is an open access journal in the domain of andrology covering all aspects of male reproductive and sexual health in both human and animal models. The journal aims to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments in andrology from the international community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信