在什么条件下?欧洲货币联盟财政稳定的叙述是如何重塑凝聚力政策的欧盟团结的。

IF 2.2 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Niccolò Donati
{"title":"在什么条件下?欧洲货币联盟财政稳定的叙述是如何重塑凝聚力政策的欧盟团结的。","authors":"Niccolò Donati","doi":"10.1080/07036337.2022.2119226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research investigates the policy narratives that were deployed by the Commission to justify the reform of Cohesion policy in relation to the long-standing process of EMU reform. Our aim is to find out how narratives about EU solidarity allowed the creation of both redistributive patterns among the Member States, and Cohesion policy's macroeconomic conditionality. We identified two narratives: one of EU solidarity, based on the 'harmonious development' of the territories, and one of EMU stability, consisting in cross-national solidarity in exchange for structural reforms. We argue that, in the context of EMU reform, the narrative of stability found a favourable interest constellation, becoming the ideational driver of the Cohesion policy reform. In order to prove this argument, we conducted an ideational process tracing on the 1988 and 1994 Cohesion policy reforms, as well as a frame analysis on a corpus of 74 speeches from relevant EU Commission policy actors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Integration","volume":"45 2","pages":"293-308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/f6/GEUI_45_2119226.PMC10041974.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Under what conditions? How the narrative of EMU fiscal stability is reshaping Cohesion policy's EU solidarity.\",\"authors\":\"Niccolò Donati\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07036337.2022.2119226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This research investigates the policy narratives that were deployed by the Commission to justify the reform of Cohesion policy in relation to the long-standing process of EMU reform. Our aim is to find out how narratives about EU solidarity allowed the creation of both redistributive patterns among the Member States, and Cohesion policy's macroeconomic conditionality. We identified two narratives: one of EU solidarity, based on the 'harmonious development' of the territories, and one of EMU stability, consisting in cross-national solidarity in exchange for structural reforms. We argue that, in the context of EMU reform, the narrative of stability found a favourable interest constellation, becoming the ideational driver of the Cohesion policy reform. In order to prove this argument, we conducted an ideational process tracing on the 1988 and 1994 Cohesion policy reforms, as well as a frame analysis on a corpus of 74 speeches from relevant EU Commission policy actors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Integration\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"293-308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/f6/GEUI_45_2119226.PMC10041974.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Integration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2119226\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Integration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2119226","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了欧盟委员会部署的政策叙事,以证明与欧洲货币联盟改革的长期进程有关的凝聚力政策改革是合理的。我们的目的是找出关于欧盟团结的叙述是如何允许在成员国之间创造再分配模式和凝聚力政策的宏观经济条件的。我们确定了两种说法:一种是基于领土“和谐发展”的欧盟团结,另一种是欧洲货币联盟的稳定,包括以跨国团结换取结构改革。我们认为,在欧洲货币联盟改革的背景下,稳定叙事找到了有利的利益星座,成为凝聚力政策改革的理念驱动因素。为了证明这一论点,我们对1988年和1994年的凝聚力政策改革进行了构想过程追踪,并对欧盟委员会相关政策参与者的74次演讲进行了框架分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Under what conditions? How the narrative of EMU fiscal stability is reshaping Cohesion policy's EU solidarity.

Under what conditions? How the narrative of EMU fiscal stability is reshaping Cohesion policy's EU solidarity.

Under what conditions? How the narrative of EMU fiscal stability is reshaping Cohesion policy's EU solidarity.

Under what conditions? How the narrative of EMU fiscal stability is reshaping Cohesion policy's EU solidarity.

This research investigates the policy narratives that were deployed by the Commission to justify the reform of Cohesion policy in relation to the long-standing process of EMU reform. Our aim is to find out how narratives about EU solidarity allowed the creation of both redistributive patterns among the Member States, and Cohesion policy's macroeconomic conditionality. We identified two narratives: one of EU solidarity, based on the 'harmonious development' of the territories, and one of EMU stability, consisting in cross-national solidarity in exchange for structural reforms. We argue that, in the context of EMU reform, the narrative of stability found a favourable interest constellation, becoming the ideational driver of the Cohesion policy reform. In order to prove this argument, we conducted an ideational process tracing on the 1988 and 1994 Cohesion policy reforms, as well as a frame analysis on a corpus of 74 speeches from relevant EU Commission policy actors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信