间隙预备后根内清洁方案对清洁剂对根本质边缘适应的影响。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Luciana C Boggian, Ana V Silva, Geovana R Santos, Geovanna F Oliveira, Winston L Silva, Ismar Nery Neto, Orlando A Guedes, Carlos Estrela
{"title":"间隙预备后根内清洁方案对清洁剂对根本质边缘适应的影响。","authors":"Luciana C Boggian,&nbsp;Ana V Silva,&nbsp;Geovana R Santos,&nbsp;Geovanna F Oliveira,&nbsp;Winston L Silva,&nbsp;Ismar Nery Neto,&nbsp;Orlando A Guedes,&nbsp;Carlos Estrela","doi":"10.2334/josnusd.22-0344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of intra-radicular cleaning protocols after post-space preparation (PSP) on marginal adaptation of a luting agent to root dentin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty bovine incisors were sectioned transversely to obtain 18-mm-long root sections. The roots were prepared with ProTaper instruments and filled using Tagger's hybrid technique. PSP was performed at a length of 14 mm using #3-5 Largo drills. The roots were distributed into eight groups according to the chelating solution used (17% EDTA or 0.2% Chitosan) and the chelating activation/delivery method employed (conventional needle irrigation [CNI], EndoActivator [EA], XP-Endo Finisher [XPF] or passive ultrasonic irrigation [PUI]). The fiber posts were cemented using self-adhesive resin cement, and the roots were sectioned to obtain three discs from each root third. The dentin discs were observed under an optical microscope at ×40 magnification to assess marginal adaptation. The different protocols were compared considering the frequency of the marginal adaptation scores using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner test (α = 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of 17% EDTA resulted in better marginal adaptation (P < 0.001). PUI yielded results that were similar to those for EA (P = 0.949) and superior to those for XPF (P = 0.020). The combination of 17% EDTA + PUI provided a greater number of interfaces without marginal gaps (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cleaning protocol influenced the marginal adaptation of resin cement to root dentin.</p>","PeriodicalId":16646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of intra-radicular cleaning protocols after post-space preparation on marginal adaptation of a luting agent to root dentin.\",\"authors\":\"Luciana C Boggian,&nbsp;Ana V Silva,&nbsp;Geovana R Santos,&nbsp;Geovanna F Oliveira,&nbsp;Winston L Silva,&nbsp;Ismar Nery Neto,&nbsp;Orlando A Guedes,&nbsp;Carlos Estrela\",\"doi\":\"10.2334/josnusd.22-0344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of intra-radicular cleaning protocols after post-space preparation (PSP) on marginal adaptation of a luting agent to root dentin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty bovine incisors were sectioned transversely to obtain 18-mm-long root sections. The roots were prepared with ProTaper instruments and filled using Tagger's hybrid technique. PSP was performed at a length of 14 mm using #3-5 Largo drills. The roots were distributed into eight groups according to the chelating solution used (17% EDTA or 0.2% Chitosan) and the chelating activation/delivery method employed (conventional needle irrigation [CNI], EndoActivator [EA], XP-Endo Finisher [XPF] or passive ultrasonic irrigation [PUI]). The fiber posts were cemented using self-adhesive resin cement, and the roots were sectioned to obtain three discs from each root third. The dentin discs were observed under an optical microscope at ×40 magnification to assess marginal adaptation. The different protocols were compared considering the frequency of the marginal adaptation scores using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner test (α = 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of 17% EDTA resulted in better marginal adaptation (P < 0.001). PUI yielded results that were similar to those for EA (P = 0.949) and superior to those for XPF (P = 0.020). The combination of 17% EDTA + PUI provided a greater number of interfaces without marginal gaps (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cleaning protocol influenced the marginal adaptation of resin cement to root dentin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.22-0344\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.22-0344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评价牙根间隙预备(PSP)后根内清洁方案对牙根牙本质边缘适应的影响。方法:对80只牛切牙进行横切,获得长18mm的根切面。根用ProTaper器械制备,并用Tagger杂交技术填充。使用#3-5 Largo钻头进行长度为14 mm的PSP。根据使用的螯合溶液(17% EDTA或0.2%壳糖)和螯合激活/递送方法(传统针刺冲洗[CNI]、EndoActivator [EA]、XPF - endo Finisher [XPF]或被动超声冲洗[PUI])将根分为8组。纤维桩采用自粘树脂胶粘剂进行胶结,并对根进行切片,每根三分之一处取三盘。在×40放大光学显微镜下观察牙本质盘,评估边缘适应。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner检验(α = 5%)比较不同方案的边际适应评分频率。结果:使用17% EDTA可获得更好的边际适应(P < 0.001)。PUI的结果与EA相似(P = 0.949),优于XPF (P = 0.020)。17% EDTA + PUI的组合提供了更多的界面,没有边际间隙(P < 0.001)。结论:清洁方式影响树脂粘接体对牙根本质的边缘适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of intra-radicular cleaning protocols after post-space preparation on marginal adaptation of a luting agent to root dentin.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of intra-radicular cleaning protocols after post-space preparation (PSP) on marginal adaptation of a luting agent to root dentin.

Methods: Eighty bovine incisors were sectioned transversely to obtain 18-mm-long root sections. The roots were prepared with ProTaper instruments and filled using Tagger's hybrid technique. PSP was performed at a length of 14 mm using #3-5 Largo drills. The roots were distributed into eight groups according to the chelating solution used (17% EDTA or 0.2% Chitosan) and the chelating activation/delivery method employed (conventional needle irrigation [CNI], EndoActivator [EA], XP-Endo Finisher [XPF] or passive ultrasonic irrigation [PUI]). The fiber posts were cemented using self-adhesive resin cement, and the roots were sectioned to obtain three discs from each root third. The dentin discs were observed under an optical microscope at ×40 magnification to assess marginal adaptation. The different protocols were compared considering the frequency of the marginal adaptation scores using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner test (α = 5%).

Results: The use of 17% EDTA resulted in better marginal adaptation (P < 0.001). PUI yielded results that were similar to those for EA (P = 0.949) and superior to those for XPF (P = 0.020). The combination of 17% EDTA + PUI provided a greater number of interfaces without marginal gaps (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The cleaning protocol influenced the marginal adaptation of resin cement to root dentin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of oral science
Journal of oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信