环境与长期:不同标准的比较

Andrea Beltratti , Garciela Chichilnisky , Geoffrey Heal
{"title":"环境与长期:不同标准的比较","authors":"Andrea Beltratti ,&nbsp;Garciela Chichilnisky ,&nbsp;Geoffrey Heal","doi":"10.1016/0035-5054(94)90011-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We use growth models with natural resources to study the consequences of a ranking of intertemporal paths, due to Chichilnisky, which places weight on their very long run or limiting characteristics as well as on their characteristics over any finite period. This criterion shows more intertemporal symmetry or egalitarianism than the discounted utilitarian approach, which clearly emphasizes the immediate future at the expense of the long run. In this respect it captures the concenrs of those who argue for sustainability and for a heightened sense of responsibility to the future. In some of the examples that we consider, the long-run characteristics of paths optimal by this criterion are a mixture of those of utilitarian paths and the “green golden rule” (the configuration which maximizes long-run sustainable utility from consumption and environment).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101136,"journal":{"name":"Ricerche Economiche","volume":"48 4","pages":"Pages 319-340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0035-5054(94)90011-6","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The environment and the long run: a comparison of different criteria\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Beltratti ,&nbsp;Garciela Chichilnisky ,&nbsp;Geoffrey Heal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0035-5054(94)90011-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We use growth models with natural resources to study the consequences of a ranking of intertemporal paths, due to Chichilnisky, which places weight on their very long run or limiting characteristics as well as on their characteristics over any finite period. This criterion shows more intertemporal symmetry or egalitarianism than the discounted utilitarian approach, which clearly emphasizes the immediate future at the expense of the long run. In this respect it captures the concenrs of those who argue for sustainability and for a heightened sense of responsibility to the future. In some of the examples that we consider, the long-run characteristics of paths optimal by this criterion are a mixture of those of utilitarian paths and the “green golden rule” (the configuration which maximizes long-run sustainable utility from consumption and environment).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ricerche Economiche\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 319-340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0035-5054(94)90011-6\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ricerche Economiche\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0035505494900116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ricerche Economiche","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0035505494900116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

由于Chichilnisky,我们使用自然资源的增长模型来研究跨期路径排名的结果,该排名既重视它们的长期或限制特征,也重视它们在任何有限时期的特征。这一标准比打折扣的功利主义方法显示出更多的跨期对称性或平均主义,后者显然是以牺牲长期为代价强调眼前的未来。在这方面,它抓住了那些主张可持续性和提高对未来责任感的人的关切。在我们考虑的一些例子中,根据这一标准优化的路径的长期特征是功利主义路径和“绿色黄金法则”(从消费和环境中最大化长期可持续效用的配置)的混合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The environment and the long run: a comparison of different criteria

We use growth models with natural resources to study the consequences of a ranking of intertemporal paths, due to Chichilnisky, which places weight on their very long run or limiting characteristics as well as on their characteristics over any finite period. This criterion shows more intertemporal symmetry or egalitarianism than the discounted utilitarian approach, which clearly emphasizes the immediate future at the expense of the long run. In this respect it captures the concenrs of those who argue for sustainability and for a heightened sense of responsibility to the future. In some of the examples that we consider, the long-run characteristics of paths optimal by this criterion are a mixture of those of utilitarian paths and the “green golden rule” (the configuration which maximizes long-run sustainable utility from consumption and environment).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信