内科住院医师诊所的观点:一项对美国医学主任的全国性调查。

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Robert J Fortuna, Daniel G Tobin, Halle G Sobel, Ernie-Paul Barrette, Craig Noroha, Larry Laufman, Xiaofan Huang, Kristen A Staggers, Mohan Nadkarni, Lee B Lu
{"title":"内科住院医师诊所的观点:一项对美国医学主任的全国性调查。","authors":"Robert J Fortuna,&nbsp;Daniel G Tobin,&nbsp;Halle G Sobel,&nbsp;Ernie-Paul Barrette,&nbsp;Craig Noroha,&nbsp;Larry Laufman,&nbsp;Xiaofan Huang,&nbsp;Kristen A Staggers,&nbsp;Mohan Nadkarni,&nbsp;Lee B Lu","doi":"10.4103/efh.efh_75_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ambulatory training is an integral component of internal medicine residency programs, yet details regarding operational processes in resident continuity clinics remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed a convenience sample of medical directors of residency practices between 2015 and 2019 (n = 222) to describe and share operational and scheduling processes in internal medicine resident continuity clinics in the US.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among residency practices, support for the medical director role ranged substantially, but was most commonly reported at 11%-20% full-time-equivalent support. By the end of the survey period, the majority of programs (65.1%) reported obtaining patient-centered medical home (PCMH) certification (level 1-3). For new patient appointments, 34.9% of programs reported a 1-7 day wait and 25.8% reported an 8-14 day wait. Wait times for new appointments were generally shorter for PCMH certified practices (P = 0.029). No-show rates were most commonly 26%-50% for new patients and 11%-25% for established patients. Most programs reported that interns see 3-4 patients per ½-day and senior residents see 5-6 patients per ½-day. Most interns and residents maintain a panel size of 51-120 patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Creating high-performing residency clinics requires a focus on core building blocks and operational processes. Based on the survey results and consensus opinion, we provide five summary recommendations related to (1) support for the medical director leadership role, (2) patient-centered and coordinated models of care, (3) support for patient scheduling, (4) recommended visit lengths, and (5) ancillary support, such as social work.</p>","PeriodicalId":46742,"journal":{"name":"Education for Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives of internal medicine residency clinics: A national survey of US medical directors.\",\"authors\":\"Robert J Fortuna,&nbsp;Daniel G Tobin,&nbsp;Halle G Sobel,&nbsp;Ernie-Paul Barrette,&nbsp;Craig Noroha,&nbsp;Larry Laufman,&nbsp;Xiaofan Huang,&nbsp;Kristen A Staggers,&nbsp;Mohan Nadkarni,&nbsp;Lee B Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/efh.efh_75_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ambulatory training is an integral component of internal medicine residency programs, yet details regarding operational processes in resident continuity clinics remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed a convenience sample of medical directors of residency practices between 2015 and 2019 (n = 222) to describe and share operational and scheduling processes in internal medicine resident continuity clinics in the US.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among residency practices, support for the medical director role ranged substantially, but was most commonly reported at 11%-20% full-time-equivalent support. By the end of the survey period, the majority of programs (65.1%) reported obtaining patient-centered medical home (PCMH) certification (level 1-3). For new patient appointments, 34.9% of programs reported a 1-7 day wait and 25.8% reported an 8-14 day wait. Wait times for new appointments were generally shorter for PCMH certified practices (P = 0.029). No-show rates were most commonly 26%-50% for new patients and 11%-25% for established patients. Most programs reported that interns see 3-4 patients per ½-day and senior residents see 5-6 patients per ½-day. Most interns and residents maintain a panel size of 51-120 patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Creating high-performing residency clinics requires a focus on core building blocks and operational processes. Based on the survey results and consensus opinion, we provide five summary recommendations related to (1) support for the medical director leadership role, (2) patient-centered and coordinated models of care, (3) support for patient scheduling, (4) recommended visit lengths, and (5) ancillary support, such as social work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education for Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education for Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/efh.efh_75_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/efh.efh_75_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:门诊培训是内科住院医师计划的一个组成部分,然而关于住院医师连续性诊所的操作流程的细节仍然有限。方法:我们调查了2015年至2019年期间住院医师执业医疗主任的便利样本(n = 222),以描述和分享美国内科住院医师连续性诊所的操作和调度流程。结果:在住院医师实践中,对医疗主任角色的支持相差很大,但最常见的是全职支持的11%-20%。在调查期结束时,大多数项目(65.1%)报告获得了以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)认证(1-3级)。对于新患者预约,34.9%的项目报告等待1-7天,25.8%的项目报告等待8-14天。新预约的等待时间通常较短的PCMH认证执业(P = 0.029)。缺勤率在新患者中最为常见,为26%-50%,在老患者中为11%-25%。大多数项目报告说,实习生每½天要看3-4个病人,老年住院医生每½天要看5-6个病人。大多数实习医生和住院医生的诊疗小组规模在51-120人之间。讨论:创建高绩效住院医师诊所需要关注核心构建模块和操作流程。根据调查结果和共识意见,我们提供了五个总结建议,涉及(1)支持医疗主任领导角色,(2)以患者为中心和协调的护理模式,(3)支持患者安排,(4)推荐就诊时间,以及(5)辅助支持,如社会工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectives of internal medicine residency clinics: A national survey of US medical directors.

Background: Ambulatory training is an integral component of internal medicine residency programs, yet details regarding operational processes in resident continuity clinics remain limited.

Methods: We surveyed a convenience sample of medical directors of residency practices between 2015 and 2019 (n = 222) to describe and share operational and scheduling processes in internal medicine resident continuity clinics in the US.

Results: Among residency practices, support for the medical director role ranged substantially, but was most commonly reported at 11%-20% full-time-equivalent support. By the end of the survey period, the majority of programs (65.1%) reported obtaining patient-centered medical home (PCMH) certification (level 1-3). For new patient appointments, 34.9% of programs reported a 1-7 day wait and 25.8% reported an 8-14 day wait. Wait times for new appointments were generally shorter for PCMH certified practices (P = 0.029). No-show rates were most commonly 26%-50% for new patients and 11%-25% for established patients. Most programs reported that interns see 3-4 patients per ½-day and senior residents see 5-6 patients per ½-day. Most interns and residents maintain a panel size of 51-120 patients.

Discussion: Creating high-performing residency clinics requires a focus on core building blocks and operational processes. Based on the survey results and consensus opinion, we provide five summary recommendations related to (1) support for the medical director leadership role, (2) patient-centered and coordinated models of care, (3) support for patient scheduling, (4) recommended visit lengths, and (5) ancillary support, such as social work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education for Health
Education for Health EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice (EfH) is the scholarly, peer-reviewed journal of The Network: Towards Unity for Health. Our readers are health professionals, health professions educators and learners, health care researchers, policymakers, community leaders and administrators from all over the world. We publish original studies, reviews, think pieces, works in progress and commentaries on current trends, issues, and controversies. We especially want to provide our international readers with fresh ideas and innovative models of education and health services that can enable them to be maximally responsive to the healthcare needs of the communities in which they work and learn.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信