Christopher de Saxe , Daniel Ainalis , John Miles , Philip Greening , Adam Gripton , Christopher Thorne , David Cebon
{"title":"电动道路系统或大电池:对英国公路货运的影响","authors":"Christopher de Saxe , Daniel Ainalis , John Miles , Philip Greening , Adam Gripton , Christopher Thorne , David Cebon","doi":"10.1016/j.treng.2023.100210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An Electric Road System (ERS)—comprising a network of overhead cables to charge Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGVs) via a pantograph pick-up—is a cost-competitive solution to rapidly decarbonise the UK road freight sector. A major benefit over conventional battery electric HGVs is the reduction in battery capacities needed to fulfil logistics needs. In this study, we develop a detailed vehicle simulation model and use it to calculate the battery capacity requirements of real UK logistics journeys against a range of ERS network sizes and on-route static charging options. The results show that, averaged over all static charging scenarios, ERS reduces battery sizes by 41 %, 62 %, and 75 % for the ‘Light’ (2,750 km), ‘Medium’ (5,500 km) and ‘Heavy’ (8,500 km) ERS scenarios. Of the static charging scenarios, drop-off charging is shown to be more effective than rest stop charging at reducing battery sizes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34480,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Engineering","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X23000507/pdfft?md5=b2529ad72b46121ebe5a4c4d923a3024&pid=1-s2.0-S2666691X23000507-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An electric road system or big batteries: Implications for UK road freight\",\"authors\":\"Christopher de Saxe , Daniel Ainalis , John Miles , Philip Greening , Adam Gripton , Christopher Thorne , David Cebon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.treng.2023.100210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An Electric Road System (ERS)—comprising a network of overhead cables to charge Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGVs) via a pantograph pick-up—is a cost-competitive solution to rapidly decarbonise the UK road freight sector. A major benefit over conventional battery electric HGVs is the reduction in battery capacities needed to fulfil logistics needs. In this study, we develop a detailed vehicle simulation model and use it to calculate the battery capacity requirements of real UK logistics journeys against a range of ERS network sizes and on-route static charging options. The results show that, averaged over all static charging scenarios, ERS reduces battery sizes by 41 %, 62 %, and 75 % for the ‘Light’ (2,750 km), ‘Medium’ (5,500 km) and ‘Heavy’ (8,500 km) ERS scenarios. Of the static charging scenarios, drop-off charging is shown to be more effective than rest stop charging at reducing battery sizes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Engineering\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X23000507/pdfft?md5=b2529ad72b46121ebe5a4c4d923a3024&pid=1-s2.0-S2666691X23000507-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X23000507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X23000507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
An electric road system or big batteries: Implications for UK road freight
An Electric Road System (ERS)—comprising a network of overhead cables to charge Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGVs) via a pantograph pick-up—is a cost-competitive solution to rapidly decarbonise the UK road freight sector. A major benefit over conventional battery electric HGVs is the reduction in battery capacities needed to fulfil logistics needs. In this study, we develop a detailed vehicle simulation model and use it to calculate the battery capacity requirements of real UK logistics journeys against a range of ERS network sizes and on-route static charging options. The results show that, averaged over all static charging scenarios, ERS reduces battery sizes by 41 %, 62 %, and 75 % for the ‘Light’ (2,750 km), ‘Medium’ (5,500 km) and ‘Heavy’ (8,500 km) ERS scenarios. Of the static charging scenarios, drop-off charging is shown to be more effective than rest stop charging at reducing battery sizes.