针对不同文化和语言群体的健康教育资源的开发和评估:系统综述。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Corie Gray, Georgia Porter, Roanna Lobo, Gemma Crawford
{"title":"针对不同文化和语言群体的健康教育资源的开发和评估:系统综述。","authors":"Corie Gray, Georgia Porter, Roanna Lobo, Gemma Crawford","doi":"10.1093/her/cyad015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People from culturally and linguistically diverse (CaLD) backgrounds in Australia generally experience poorer health outcomes, explained in part by low levels of health literacy. We conducted a systematic review to examine the development and evaluation of health education resources designed for CaLD populations. Five electronic databases were searched for English language, peer-reviewed studies published between 1980 and 2020. Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-four different health education resources were described and broadly categorized into four types: media campaigns (n = 10), text-based materials (n = 5), films (n = 8) and radio (n = 1). Studies were assessed against domains adapted from a health literacy guideline incorporating: need, collaboration, audience, health literacy, theory, test and process and impact evaluation. All but one study met the majority of the domains. All studies reported positive evaluation outcomes; this may be due to studies involving community early in resource design and including health literacy considerations in their design. Reporting resource design and evaluation against standard practice controls is recommended to build a more robust evidence base for developing effective health education resources for use by audiences from CaLD backgrounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":48236,"journal":{"name":"Health Education Research","volume":" ","pages":"102-118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and evaluation of health education resources for culturally and linguistically diverse populations: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Corie Gray, Georgia Porter, Roanna Lobo, Gemma Crawford\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/her/cyad015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>People from culturally and linguistically diverse (CaLD) backgrounds in Australia generally experience poorer health outcomes, explained in part by low levels of health literacy. We conducted a systematic review to examine the development and evaluation of health education resources designed for CaLD populations. Five electronic databases were searched for English language, peer-reviewed studies published between 1980 and 2020. Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-four different health education resources were described and broadly categorized into four types: media campaigns (n = 10), text-based materials (n = 5), films (n = 8) and radio (n = 1). Studies were assessed against domains adapted from a health literacy guideline incorporating: need, collaboration, audience, health literacy, theory, test and process and impact evaluation. All but one study met the majority of the domains. All studies reported positive evaluation outcomes; this may be due to studies involving community early in resource design and including health literacy considerations in their design. Reporting resource design and evaluation against standard practice controls is recommended to build a more robust evidence base for developing effective health education resources for use by audiences from CaLD backgrounds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Education Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Education Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyad015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyad015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在澳大利亚,来自不同文化和语言背景(CaLD)的人通常健康状况较差,部分原因是他们的健康素养水平较低。我们开展了一项系统性综述,研究针对CaLD人群设计的健康教育资源的开发与评估。我们在五个电子数据库中搜索了 1980 年至 2020 年间发表的英语同行评审研究。有 34 项研究符合纳入标准。研究描述了 24 种不同的健康教育资源,并将其大致分为四种类型:媒体宣传(n = 10)、基于文本的材料(n = 5)、电影(n = 8)和广播(n = 1)。研究根据健康素养指南改编的领域进行评估,这些领域包括:需求、合作、受众、健康素养、理论、测试和过程以及影响评估。除一项研究外,其他所有研究都符合大多数领域的要求。所有研究都报告了积极的评估结果;这可能是由于研究让社区尽早参与到资源设计中,并在设计中考虑了健康素养因素。建议根据标准实践控制来报告资源的设计和评估情况,以便为开发有效的健康教育资源,供具有 CaLD 背景的受众使用,建立更坚实的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and evaluation of health education resources for culturally and linguistically diverse populations: a systematic review.

People from culturally and linguistically diverse (CaLD) backgrounds in Australia generally experience poorer health outcomes, explained in part by low levels of health literacy. We conducted a systematic review to examine the development and evaluation of health education resources designed for CaLD populations. Five electronic databases were searched for English language, peer-reviewed studies published between 1980 and 2020. Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-four different health education resources were described and broadly categorized into four types: media campaigns (n = 10), text-based materials (n = 5), films (n = 8) and radio (n = 1). Studies were assessed against domains adapted from a health literacy guideline incorporating: need, collaboration, audience, health literacy, theory, test and process and impact evaluation. All but one study met the majority of the domains. All studies reported positive evaluation outcomes; this may be due to studies involving community early in resource design and including health literacy considerations in their design. Reporting resource design and evaluation against standard practice controls is recommended to build a more robust evidence base for developing effective health education resources for use by audiences from CaLD backgrounds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Publishing original, refereed papers, Health Education Research deals with all the vital issues involved in health education and promotion worldwide - providing a valuable link between the health education research and practice communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信