在埃塞俄比亚提供的客户对选定的豁免保健服务的满意度方面的质量差异:荟萃分析

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Wodaje Gietaneh , Atsede Alle , Muluneh Alene , Moges Agazhe Assemie , Muluye Molla Simieneh , Molla Yigzaw Birhanu
{"title":"在埃塞俄比亚提供的客户对选定的豁免保健服务的满意度方面的质量差异:荟萃分析","authors":"Wodaje Gietaneh ,&nbsp;Atsede Alle ,&nbsp;Muluneh Alene ,&nbsp;Moges Agazhe Assemie ,&nbsp;Muluye Molla Simieneh ,&nbsp;Molla Yigzaw Birhanu","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2022.100068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In Ethiopia; even though utilization of health care services has been improved after the introduction of user fee exemption, little is known about the quality of the services. There are fragmented studies on the output dimension of quality of health care services particularly on clients’ satisfaction. Therefore this study aims to assess overall quality (in terms of clients’ satisfaction) and its disparity among users of selected exempted health care services provided in Ethiopia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was used to undertake this study. Both published and unpublished articles conducted in Ethiopia on the quality of health care services in terms of clients’ satisfaction dimensions were searched. A total of 750 articles were retrieved through international databases (Scopus, MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library) and national digital library repositories (Addis Ababa University’s digital library repository); 703 of which were excluded while only 47 articles were included in the <em>meta</em>-analysis. The search for articles was conducted during the period 03 December 2019 to 28 January 2020. For methodological qualities of the included articles assessment, a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale adapted for cross-sectional studies was used. R version 3.6.1 and stata version 14 soft wares were used for analysis. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates. The I2 tests were used to assess the heterogeneity of the studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The pooled overall prevalence of included 47 studies revealed that clients’ satisfaction among users of selected exempted health care services in Ethiopia was 70% (95% CI: 64, 74%). In subgroup analysis; the lowest prevalence of clients’ satisfaction was observed among users of obstetrics maternal health care services with the prevalence of 65.04% (95% CI: 57.50, 72.58).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study found that more than one-third of respondents; was not satisfied with exempted health care services. There is slight difference in satisfaction of clients across type of exempted health care services and regions. Policy and decision makers in Ethiopia shall design strategies to optimize quality of health care services besides exemption of its <span>costs.it</span><svg><path></path></svg> is also strongly recommend that a special emphasis shall be given to obstetric health care services provision. Moreover, concerned stakeholders’ (ministry of health, etc.) should strengthen compassionate respectful care provision in public health facilities; beside to removing user fees.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259022962200003X/pdfft?md5=f2d45f937d0d3495a14f76df2c1d9e91&pid=1-s2.0-S259022962200003X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality disparity in terms of clients’ satisfaction with selected exempted health care services provided in Ethiopia: Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Wodaje Gietaneh ,&nbsp;Atsede Alle ,&nbsp;Muluneh Alene ,&nbsp;Moges Agazhe Assemie ,&nbsp;Muluye Molla Simieneh ,&nbsp;Molla Yigzaw Birhanu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hpopen.2022.100068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In Ethiopia; even though utilization of health care services has been improved after the introduction of user fee exemption, little is known about the quality of the services. There are fragmented studies on the output dimension of quality of health care services particularly on clients’ satisfaction. Therefore this study aims to assess overall quality (in terms of clients’ satisfaction) and its disparity among users of selected exempted health care services provided in Ethiopia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was used to undertake this study. Both published and unpublished articles conducted in Ethiopia on the quality of health care services in terms of clients’ satisfaction dimensions were searched. A total of 750 articles were retrieved through international databases (Scopus, MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library) and national digital library repositories (Addis Ababa University’s digital library repository); 703 of which were excluded while only 47 articles were included in the <em>meta</em>-analysis. The search for articles was conducted during the period 03 December 2019 to 28 January 2020. For methodological qualities of the included articles assessment, a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale adapted for cross-sectional studies was used. R version 3.6.1 and stata version 14 soft wares were used for analysis. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates. The I2 tests were used to assess the heterogeneity of the studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The pooled overall prevalence of included 47 studies revealed that clients’ satisfaction among users of selected exempted health care services in Ethiopia was 70% (95% CI: 64, 74%). In subgroup analysis; the lowest prevalence of clients’ satisfaction was observed among users of obstetrics maternal health care services with the prevalence of 65.04% (95% CI: 57.50, 72.58).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study found that more than one-third of respondents; was not satisfied with exempted health care services. There is slight difference in satisfaction of clients across type of exempted health care services and regions. Policy and decision makers in Ethiopia shall design strategies to optimize quality of health care services besides exemption of its <span>costs.it</span><svg><path></path></svg> is also strongly recommend that a special emphasis shall be given to obstetric health care services provision. Moreover, concerned stakeholders’ (ministry of health, etc.) should strengthen compassionate respectful care provision in public health facilities; beside to removing user fees.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259022962200003X/pdfft?md5=f2d45f937d0d3495a14f76df2c1d9e91&pid=1-s2.0-S259022962200003X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259022962200003X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259022962200003X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

IntroductionIn埃塞俄比亚;尽管在实行免收用户费用后,保健服务的利用情况有所改善,但人们对服务的质量知之甚少。关于卫生保健服务质量的产出维度,特别是关于客户满意度的产出维度,有零散的研究。因此,本研究旨在评估总体质量(就客户满意度而言)及其在埃塞俄比亚提供的选定豁免医疗保健服务的用户之间的差异。方法采用系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行本研究。从客户满意度的角度搜索了在埃塞俄比亚进行的关于保健服务质量的已发表和未发表的文章。通过国际数据库(Scopus、MEDLINE/PubMed、Science Direct、谷歌Scholar和Cochrane Library)和国家数字图书馆库(亚的斯亚贝巴大学数字图书馆库)共检索到750篇文章;其中703篇被排除,而只有47篇文章被纳入meta分析。文章检索是在2019年12月3日至2020年1月28日期间进行的。为了评估纳入文章的方法学质量,采用了适用于横断面研究的修改版纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表。采用R版本3.6.1和stata版本14软件进行分析。随机效应模型用于计算汇总估计。I2检验用于评估研究的异质性。结果纳入的47项研究的汇总总体患病率显示,埃塞俄比亚选定的豁免医疗保健服务用户的客户满意度为70%(95%置信区间:64,74%)。亚群分析;产科孕产妇保健服务使用者的满意度最低,为65.04% (95% CI: 57.50, 72.58)。本研究发现,超过三分之一的受访者;对免费医疗服务不满意。不同类型的免费医疗服务和不同地区的免费医疗服务客户满意度存在细微差异。埃塞俄比亚的政策和决策者应制定战略,除免除医疗保健费用外,还应优化医疗保健服务的质量。委员会还强烈建议,应特别强调提供产科保健服务。此外,有关利益攸关方(卫生部等)应加强公共卫生设施中提供富有同情心的尊重性护理;除了取消用户费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality disparity in terms of clients’ satisfaction with selected exempted health care services provided in Ethiopia: Meta-analysis

Introduction

In Ethiopia; even though utilization of health care services has been improved after the introduction of user fee exemption, little is known about the quality of the services. There are fragmented studies on the output dimension of quality of health care services particularly on clients’ satisfaction. Therefore this study aims to assess overall quality (in terms of clients’ satisfaction) and its disparity among users of selected exempted health care services provided in Ethiopia.

Methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was used to undertake this study. Both published and unpublished articles conducted in Ethiopia on the quality of health care services in terms of clients’ satisfaction dimensions were searched. A total of 750 articles were retrieved through international databases (Scopus, MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library) and national digital library repositories (Addis Ababa University’s digital library repository); 703 of which were excluded while only 47 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The search for articles was conducted during the period 03 December 2019 to 28 January 2020. For methodological qualities of the included articles assessment, a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale adapted for cross-sectional studies was used. R version 3.6.1 and stata version 14 soft wares were used for analysis. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates. The I2 tests were used to assess the heterogeneity of the studies.

Results

The pooled overall prevalence of included 47 studies revealed that clients’ satisfaction among users of selected exempted health care services in Ethiopia was 70% (95% CI: 64, 74%). In subgroup analysis; the lowest prevalence of clients’ satisfaction was observed among users of obstetrics maternal health care services with the prevalence of 65.04% (95% CI: 57.50, 72.58).

Conclusion

This study found that more than one-third of respondents; was not satisfied with exempted health care services. There is slight difference in satisfaction of clients across type of exempted health care services and regions. Policy and decision makers in Ethiopia shall design strategies to optimize quality of health care services besides exemption of its costs.it is also strongly recommend that a special emphasis shall be given to obstetric health care services provision. Moreover, concerned stakeholders’ (ministry of health, etc.) should strengthen compassionate respectful care provision in public health facilities; beside to removing user fees.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信