腹腔镜手术中I级肥胖对呼吸力学的影响:前瞻性纵向研究

IF 1 Q3 Medicine
Orlandira Costa Araujo , Eloisa Bonetti Espada , Fernanda Magalhães Arantes Costa , Julia Araujo Vigiato , Maria José Carvalho Carmona , José Pinhata Otoch , João Manoel Silva Jr , Milton de Arruda Martins
{"title":"腹腔镜手术中I级肥胖对呼吸力学的影响:前瞻性纵向研究","authors":"Orlandira Costa Araujo ,&nbsp;Eloisa Bonetti Espada ,&nbsp;Fernanda Magalhães Arantes Costa ,&nbsp;Julia Araujo Vigiato ,&nbsp;Maria José Carvalho Carmona ,&nbsp;José Pinhata Otoch ,&nbsp;João Manoel Silva Jr ,&nbsp;Milton de Arruda Martins","doi":"10.1016/j.bjan.2019.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>The association pneumoperitoneum and obesity in video laparoscopy can contribute to pulmonary complications, but has not been well defined in specific groups of obese individuals. We assessed the effects of pneumoperitoneum in respiratory mechanics in Grade I obese compared to non‐obese.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Prospective study including 20 patients submitted to video laparoscopic cholecystectomy, normal spirometry, divided into non‐obese (BMI ≤ 25<!--> <!-->kg.m<sup>–2</sup>) and obese (BMI &gt; 30<!--> <!-->kg.mg<sup>–2</sup>), excluding Grade II and III obese. We measured pulmonary ventilation mechanics data before pneumoperitoneum (baseline), and five, fifteen and thirty minutes after peritoneal insufflation, and fifteen minutes after disinflation (final).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean BMI of non‐obese was 22.72 ± 1.43<!--> <!-->kg.m<sup>–2</sup> and of the obese 31.78 ± 1.09<!--> <!-->kg.m<sup>–2</sup>, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01. Duration of anesthesia and of peritoneal insufflation was similar between groups. Baseline pulmonary compliance (Crs) of the obese (38.3 ± 8.3<!--> <!-->mL.cm H<sub>2</sub>O<sup>–1</sup>) was lower than of the non‐obese (47.4 ± 5.7<!--> <!-->mL.cm H<sub>2</sub>O<sup>–1</sup>), <em>p</em> = 0.01. After insufflation, Crs decreased in both groups and remained even lower in the obese at all moments assessed (GLM <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). Respiratory system peak pressure and plateau pressure were higher in the obese, albeit variations were similar at moments analyzed (GLM <em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). The same occurred with elastic pressure, higher in the obese at all times (GLM <em>p</em> = 0.04), and resistive pressure showed differences in variations between groups during pneumoperitoneum (GLM <em>p</em> = 0,05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Grade I obese presented more changes in pulmonary mechanics than the non‐obese during video laparoscopies and the fact requires mechanical ventilation‐related care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21261,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2019.12.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacto da obesidade Grau I na mecânica respiratória durante cirurgia videolaparoscópica: estudo longitudinal prospectivo\",\"authors\":\"Orlandira Costa Araujo ,&nbsp;Eloisa Bonetti Espada ,&nbsp;Fernanda Magalhães Arantes Costa ,&nbsp;Julia Araujo Vigiato ,&nbsp;Maria José Carvalho Carmona ,&nbsp;José Pinhata Otoch ,&nbsp;João Manoel Silva Jr ,&nbsp;Milton de Arruda Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjan.2019.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>The association pneumoperitoneum and obesity in video laparoscopy can contribute to pulmonary complications, but has not been well defined in specific groups of obese individuals. We assessed the effects of pneumoperitoneum in respiratory mechanics in Grade I obese compared to non‐obese.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Prospective study including 20 patients submitted to video laparoscopic cholecystectomy, normal spirometry, divided into non‐obese (BMI ≤ 25<!--> <!-->kg.m<sup>–2</sup>) and obese (BMI &gt; 30<!--> <!-->kg.mg<sup>–2</sup>), excluding Grade II and III obese. We measured pulmonary ventilation mechanics data before pneumoperitoneum (baseline), and five, fifteen and thirty minutes after peritoneal insufflation, and fifteen minutes after disinflation (final).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean BMI of non‐obese was 22.72 ± 1.43<!--> <!-->kg.m<sup>–2</sup> and of the obese 31.78 ± 1.09<!--> <!-->kg.m<sup>–2</sup>, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01. Duration of anesthesia and of peritoneal insufflation was similar between groups. Baseline pulmonary compliance (Crs) of the obese (38.3 ± 8.3<!--> <!-->mL.cm H<sub>2</sub>O<sup>–1</sup>) was lower than of the non‐obese (47.4 ± 5.7<!--> <!-->mL.cm H<sub>2</sub>O<sup>–1</sup>), <em>p</em> = 0.01. After insufflation, Crs decreased in both groups and remained even lower in the obese at all moments assessed (GLM <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). Respiratory system peak pressure and plateau pressure were higher in the obese, albeit variations were similar at moments analyzed (GLM <em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). The same occurred with elastic pressure, higher in the obese at all times (GLM <em>p</em> = 0.04), and resistive pressure showed differences in variations between groups during pneumoperitoneum (GLM <em>p</em> = 0,05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Grade I obese presented more changes in pulmonary mechanics than the non‐obese during video laparoscopies and the fact requires mechanical ventilation‐related care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjan.2019.12.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709419300765\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de anestesiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034709419300765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

视频腹腔镜下气腹和肥胖的相关性可能导致肺部并发症,但在特定的肥胖人群中尚未得到很好的定义。我们评估了气腹对I级肥胖患者呼吸力学的影响,与非肥胖患者进行了比较。方法前瞻性研究纳入20例行视频腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者,肺活量测定正常,分为非肥胖(BMI≤25 kg.m-2)和肥胖(BMI >30 kg.mg-2),不包括II级和III级肥胖。我们测量了气腹前(基线)、腹膜充气后5分钟、15分钟和30分钟以及反充气后15分钟(最终)的肺通气力学数据。结果非肥胖组平均BMI为22.72±1.43 kg。M-2和肥胖者的31.78±1.09 kg。M-2, p <0.01. 两组麻醉时间和腹膜充气时间相似。肥胖组(38.3±8.3 mL.cm H2O-1)的基线肺顺应性(Crs)低于非肥胖组(47.4±5.7 mL.cm H2O-1), p = 0.01。充气后,两组的Crs均下降,肥胖者的Crs在所有评估时刻都保持更低(GLM p <0.01)。肥胖患者的呼吸系统峰值压和平台压较高,尽管在分析的时刻变化相似(GLM p >0.05)。弹性压力也是如此,肥胖者在任何时候都较高(GLM p = 0.04),气腹期间各组间阻力压力差异较大(GLM p = 0.05)。结论1级肥胖患者在视频腹腔镜下肺力学变化明显大于非肥胖患者,需要机械通气相关护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impacto da obesidade Grau I na mecânica respiratória durante cirurgia videolaparoscópica: estudo longitudinal prospectivo

Introduction and objectives

The association pneumoperitoneum and obesity in video laparoscopy can contribute to pulmonary complications, but has not been well defined in specific groups of obese individuals. We assessed the effects of pneumoperitoneum in respiratory mechanics in Grade I obese compared to non‐obese.

Methods

Prospective study including 20 patients submitted to video laparoscopic cholecystectomy, normal spirometry, divided into non‐obese (BMI ≤ 25 kg.m–2) and obese (BMI > 30 kg.mg–2), excluding Grade II and III obese. We measured pulmonary ventilation mechanics data before pneumoperitoneum (baseline), and five, fifteen and thirty minutes after peritoneal insufflation, and fifteen minutes after disinflation (final).

Results

Mean BMI of non‐obese was 22.72 ± 1.43 kg.m–2 and of the obese 31.78 ± 1.09 kg.m–2, p < 0.01. Duration of anesthesia and of peritoneal insufflation was similar between groups. Baseline pulmonary compliance (Crs) of the obese (38.3 ± 8.3 mL.cm H2O–1) was lower than of the non‐obese (47.4 ± 5.7 mL.cm H2O–1), p = 0.01. After insufflation, Crs decreased in both groups and remained even lower in the obese at all moments assessed (GLM p < 0.01). Respiratory system peak pressure and plateau pressure were higher in the obese, albeit variations were similar at moments analyzed (GLM p > 0.05). The same occurred with elastic pressure, higher in the obese at all times (GLM p = 0.04), and resistive pressure showed differences in variations between groups during pneumoperitoneum (GLM p = 0,05).

Conclusions

Grade I obese presented more changes in pulmonary mechanics than the non‐obese during video laparoscopies and the fact requires mechanical ventilation‐related care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology is the official journal of the Brazilian Anesthesiology Society. It publishes articles classified into the following categories: -Scientific articles (clinical or experimental trials)- Clinical information (case reports)- Reviews- Letters to the Editor- Editorials. The journal focuses primarily on clinical trials, with scope on clinical practice, aiming at providing applied tools to the anesthesiologist and critical care physician. The Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology accepts articles exclusively forwarded to it. Articles already published in other journals are not accepted. All articles proposed for publication are previously submitted to the analysis of two or more members of the Editorial Board or other specialized consultants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信