但是他们会用它吗?遗忘性轻度认知障碍患者采用电子记忆辅助的预测因素。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-20 DOI:10.1037/neu0000898
Catherine Luna, Diane J Cook, Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe
{"title":"但是他们会用它吗?遗忘性轻度认知障碍患者采用电子记忆辅助的预测因素。","authors":"Catherine Luna, Diane J Cook, Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe","doi":"10.1037/neu0000898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Electronic memory aids are being researched and developed widely to assist the everyday functioning of individuals experiencing cognitive decline. Although development studies show promise in the initial use of electronic memory aids, little is known about the factors that influence adoption of these aids after training ends.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analyzed the baseline characteristics (e.g., demographics, cognitive performance) and training usage (e.g., frequency and pattern of use) of 32 older adults experiencing amnestic mild cognitive impairment who participated in a pilot clinical trial with an electronic memory and management aid (EMMA) tablet application. Sixteen participants who were still using EMMA at 3-months posttraining were defined as \"adopters,\" whereas the 16 participants who were not using EMMA at 3-months posttraining were defined as \"nonadopters.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adopters scored higher on baseline delayed memory (Cohen's <i>d</i> = .87) and language (Cohen's <i>d</i> = .82) index scores than nonadopters. Adopters also interacted with EMMA more frequently (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.34) and in greater quantities (Cohen's <i>d</i> > .87) than nonadopters by Week 2 of training. Stepwise logistic regression revealed that higher baseline language score and increased frequency of use during training significantly predicted classification of adopters at 3-months posttraining.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adoption of this electronic memory aid was enhanced by teaching the aid to individuals who demonstrated average-level language abilities and who used the aid on average eight times per day during training. Encouraging individuals to use the aid early and often during training can increase adoption of electronic memory aids. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"955-965"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"But will they use it? Predictors of adoption of an electronic memory aid in individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Luna, Diane J Cook, Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/neu0000898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Electronic memory aids are being researched and developed widely to assist the everyday functioning of individuals experiencing cognitive decline. Although development studies show promise in the initial use of electronic memory aids, little is known about the factors that influence adoption of these aids after training ends.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analyzed the baseline characteristics (e.g., demographics, cognitive performance) and training usage (e.g., frequency and pattern of use) of 32 older adults experiencing amnestic mild cognitive impairment who participated in a pilot clinical trial with an electronic memory and management aid (EMMA) tablet application. Sixteen participants who were still using EMMA at 3-months posttraining were defined as \\\"adopters,\\\" whereas the 16 participants who were not using EMMA at 3-months posttraining were defined as \\\"nonadopters.\\\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adopters scored higher on baseline delayed memory (Cohen's <i>d</i> = .87) and language (Cohen's <i>d</i> = .82) index scores than nonadopters. Adopters also interacted with EMMA more frequently (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.34) and in greater quantities (Cohen's <i>d</i> > .87) than nonadopters by Week 2 of training. Stepwise logistic regression revealed that higher baseline language score and increased frequency of use during training significantly predicted classification of adopters at 3-months posttraining.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adoption of this electronic memory aid was enhanced by teaching the aid to individuals who demonstrated average-level language abilities and who used the aid on average eight times per day during training. Encouraging individuals to use the aid early and often during training can increase adoption of electronic memory aids. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"955-965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000898\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000898","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:电子记忆辅助器正在被广泛研究和开发,以帮助经历认知能力下降的个体的日常功能。尽管发展研究表明,电子记忆辅助器材的初步使用是有希望的,但对训练结束后影响这些辅助器材使用的因素知之甚少。方法:我们分析了32名患有失忆性轻度认知障碍的老年人的基线特征(如人口统计学、认知表现)和训练使用情况(如使用频率和模式),这些老年人参加了一项使用电子记忆和管理辅助(EMMA)平板电脑的试点临床试验。16名在训练后3个月仍在使用EMMA的参与者被定义为“采用者”,而在训练后三个月未使用EMMA时的16名参与者被定义为由“未使用者”。结果:采用者在基线延迟记忆(Cohen’s d=.87)和语言(Cohen‘s d=.82)指数得分方面高于未使用者。在第2周的训练中,领养者与EMMA的互动次数也比未领养者更频繁(Cohen的d=1.34),数量也更多(Cohen’s d>.87)。逐步逻辑回归显示,较高的基线语言得分和训练中使用频率的增加显著预测了训练后3个月采用者的分类。结论:通过向表现出平均水平语言能力的人教授这种电子记忆辅助工具,以及在训练期间平均每天使用八次这种辅助工具的人,这种电子记忆工具的使用得到了加强。鼓励个人尽早并经常在训练期间使用电子记忆辅助工具可以增加电子记忆辅助设备的使用。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
But will they use it? Predictors of adoption of an electronic memory aid in individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Objective: Electronic memory aids are being researched and developed widely to assist the everyday functioning of individuals experiencing cognitive decline. Although development studies show promise in the initial use of electronic memory aids, little is known about the factors that influence adoption of these aids after training ends.

Method: We analyzed the baseline characteristics (e.g., demographics, cognitive performance) and training usage (e.g., frequency and pattern of use) of 32 older adults experiencing amnestic mild cognitive impairment who participated in a pilot clinical trial with an electronic memory and management aid (EMMA) tablet application. Sixteen participants who were still using EMMA at 3-months posttraining were defined as "adopters," whereas the 16 participants who were not using EMMA at 3-months posttraining were defined as "nonadopters."

Results: Adopters scored higher on baseline delayed memory (Cohen's d = .87) and language (Cohen's d = .82) index scores than nonadopters. Adopters also interacted with EMMA more frequently (Cohen's d = 1.34) and in greater quantities (Cohen's d > .87) than nonadopters by Week 2 of training. Stepwise logistic regression revealed that higher baseline language score and increased frequency of use during training significantly predicted classification of adopters at 3-months posttraining.

Conclusions: Adoption of this electronic memory aid was enhanced by teaching the aid to individuals who demonstrated average-level language abilities and who used the aid on average eight times per day during training. Encouraging individuals to use the aid early and often during training can increase adoption of electronic memory aids. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信